多闪烁体组成的正电子发射层析成像探测器能量估计方法。

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Biomedical Engineering Letters Pub Date : 2025-03-04 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1007/s13534-025-00464-w
Hyeong Seok Shim, Min Jeong Cho, Jae Sung Lee
{"title":"多闪烁体组成的正电子发射层析成像探测器能量估计方法。","authors":"Hyeong Seok Shim, Min Jeong Cho, Jae Sung Lee","doi":"10.1007/s13534-025-00464-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The performance and image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) systems can be enhanced by strategically employing multiple different scintillators, particularly those with different decay times. Two cutting-edge PET detector technologies employing different scintillators with different decay times are the phoswich detector and the emerging metascintillator. In PET imaging, accurate and precise energy measurement is important for effectively rejecting scattered gamma-rays and estimating scatter distribution. However, traditional measures of light output, such as amplitude or integration values of photosensor output pulses, cannot accurately indicate the deposit energy of gamma-rays across multiple scintillators. To address these issues, this study explores two methods for energy estimation in PET detectors that employ multiple scintillators. The first method uses pseudo-inverse matrix generated from the unique pulse profile of each crystal, while the second employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to estimate the energy deposited in each crystal. The effectiveness of the proposed methods was experimentally evaluated using three heavy and dense inorganic scintillation crystals (BGO, LGSO, and GAGG) and three fast plastic scintillators (EJ200, EJ224, and EJ232). The energy estimation method employing ANNs consistently demonstrated superior accuracy across all crystal combinations when compared to the approach utilizing the pseudo-inverse matrix. In the pseudo-inverse matrix approach, there is a negligible difference in accuracy when applying integral-based energy labels as opposed to amplitude-based energy labels. On the other hand, in ANN approach, employing integral-based energy labels consistently outperforms the use of amplitude-based energy labels. This study contributes to the advancement of PET detector technology by proposing and evaluating two methods for estimating the energy in the detector using multiple scintillators. The ANN approach appears to be a promising solution for improving the accuracy of energy estimation, addressing challenges posed by mixed scintillation pulses.</p>","PeriodicalId":46898,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","volume":"15 3","pages":"489-496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011668/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy estimation methods for positron emission tomography detectors composed of multiple scintillators.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeong Seok Shim, Min Jeong Cho, Jae Sung Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13534-025-00464-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The performance and image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) systems can be enhanced by strategically employing multiple different scintillators, particularly those with different decay times. Two cutting-edge PET detector technologies employing different scintillators with different decay times are the phoswich detector and the emerging metascintillator. In PET imaging, accurate and precise energy measurement is important for effectively rejecting scattered gamma-rays and estimating scatter distribution. However, traditional measures of light output, such as amplitude or integration values of photosensor output pulses, cannot accurately indicate the deposit energy of gamma-rays across multiple scintillators. To address these issues, this study explores two methods for energy estimation in PET detectors that employ multiple scintillators. The first method uses pseudo-inverse matrix generated from the unique pulse profile of each crystal, while the second employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to estimate the energy deposited in each crystal. The effectiveness of the proposed methods was experimentally evaluated using three heavy and dense inorganic scintillation crystals (BGO, LGSO, and GAGG) and three fast plastic scintillators (EJ200, EJ224, and EJ232). The energy estimation method employing ANNs consistently demonstrated superior accuracy across all crystal combinations when compared to the approach utilizing the pseudo-inverse matrix. In the pseudo-inverse matrix approach, there is a negligible difference in accuracy when applying integral-based energy labels as opposed to amplitude-based energy labels. On the other hand, in ANN approach, employing integral-based energy labels consistently outperforms the use of amplitude-based energy labels. This study contributes to the advancement of PET detector technology by proposing and evaluating two methods for estimating the energy in the detector using multiple scintillators. The ANN approach appears to be a promising solution for improving the accuracy of energy estimation, addressing challenges posed by mixed scintillation pulses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"489-496\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12011668/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical Engineering Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00464-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Engineering Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-025-00464-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正电子发射断层扫描(PET)系统的性能和图像质量可以通过策略性地使用多个不同的闪烁体,特别是具有不同衰减时间的闪烁体来提高。采用不同衰变时间的不同闪烁体的两种前沿PET探测器技术是光电探测器和新兴的超闪烁体。在PET成像中,精确的能量测量对于有效抑制散射伽马射线和估计散射分布至关重要。然而,传统的光输出测量,如光敏传感器输出脉冲的振幅或积分值,不能准确地指示伽马射线在多个闪烁体上的沉积能量。为了解决这些问题,本研究探索了使用多个闪烁体的PET探测器的两种能量估计方法。第一种方法利用每个晶体独特的脉冲轮廓产生的伪逆矩阵,第二种方法利用人工神经网络(ANN)来估计每个晶体中沉积的能量。采用三种重密度无机闪烁晶体(BGO、LGSO和GAGG)和三种快速塑料闪烁体(EJ200、EJ224和EJ232)对所提出方法的有效性进行了实验评估。与利用伪逆矩阵的方法相比,采用人工神经网络的能量估计方法在所有晶体组合中始终表现出优越的准确性。在伪逆矩阵方法中,与基于振幅的能量标签相比,应用基于积分的能量标签在精度上的差异可以忽略不计。另一方面,在人工神经网络方法中,使用基于积分的能量标签始终优于使用基于振幅的能量标签。本研究提出并评估了两种利用多闪烁体估算探测器能量的方法,为PET探测器技术的进步做出了贡献。人工神经网络方法似乎是一种很有前途的解决方案,可以提高能量估计的准确性,解决混合闪烁脉冲带来的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy estimation methods for positron emission tomography detectors composed of multiple scintillators.

The performance and image quality of positron emission tomography (PET) systems can be enhanced by strategically employing multiple different scintillators, particularly those with different decay times. Two cutting-edge PET detector technologies employing different scintillators with different decay times are the phoswich detector and the emerging metascintillator. In PET imaging, accurate and precise energy measurement is important for effectively rejecting scattered gamma-rays and estimating scatter distribution. However, traditional measures of light output, such as amplitude or integration values of photosensor output pulses, cannot accurately indicate the deposit energy of gamma-rays across multiple scintillators. To address these issues, this study explores two methods for energy estimation in PET detectors that employ multiple scintillators. The first method uses pseudo-inverse matrix generated from the unique pulse profile of each crystal, while the second employs an artificial neural network (ANN) to estimate the energy deposited in each crystal. The effectiveness of the proposed methods was experimentally evaluated using three heavy and dense inorganic scintillation crystals (BGO, LGSO, and GAGG) and three fast plastic scintillators (EJ200, EJ224, and EJ232). The energy estimation method employing ANNs consistently demonstrated superior accuracy across all crystal combinations when compared to the approach utilizing the pseudo-inverse matrix. In the pseudo-inverse matrix approach, there is a negligible difference in accuracy when applying integral-based energy labels as opposed to amplitude-based energy labels. On the other hand, in ANN approach, employing integral-based energy labels consistently outperforms the use of amplitude-based energy labels. This study contributes to the advancement of PET detector technology by proposing and evaluating two methods for estimating the energy in the detector using multiple scintillators. The ANN approach appears to be a promising solution for improving the accuracy of energy estimation, addressing challenges posed by mixed scintillation pulses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Engineering Letters
Biomedical Engineering Letters ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Biomedical Engineering Letters (BMEL) aims to present the innovative experimental science and technological development in the biomedical field as well as clinical application of new development. The article must contain original biomedical engineering content, defined as development, theoretical analysis, and evaluation/validation of a new technique. BMEL publishes the following types of papers: original articles, review articles, editorials, and letters to the editor. All the papers are reviewed in single-blind fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信