基于网络的单次成长心态干预对减少青少年焦虑的影响:四臂随机对照试验。

IF 2.1 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Shimin Zhu, Yuxi Hu, Di Qi, Samson Tse, Ko Ling Chan, Jessica Sun, Paul Lee
{"title":"基于网络的单次成长心态干预对减少青少年焦虑的影响:四臂随机对照试验。","authors":"Shimin Zhu, Yuxi Hu, Di Qi, Samson Tse, Ko Ling Chan, Jessica Sun, Paul Lee","doi":"10.2196/63500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health conditions worldwide, yet 65% of those affected do not access services. The high prevalence of anxiety and the low rate of intervention uptake highlight the urgent need to develop timely, scalable, and effective interventions suitable for adolescents. This study adapted existing single-session interventions (SSIs) to further develop an SSI focused on a growth mindset regarding negative emotions for adolescent mental health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare the effectiveness of 4 SSIs, SSI of a growth mindset for anxiety (SIGMA), SIGMA with boosters (SIGMA-Booster), SSI of a growth mindset of personality (SSIGP), and an active control group (support therapy [ST]), in reducing adolescent anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Classes from each secondary school were randomized to 1 of 4 intervention conditions: SIGMA, SIGMA-Booster, SSIGP, or ST. Each intervention took approximately 45 minutes online. Participants reported on anxiety symptoms (primary outcome), depressive symptoms, suicidal/self-harming thoughts, perceived control, hopelessness, attitude toward help-seeking, and psychological well-being (secondary outcomes) at preintervention, 2-week follow-up, and 8-week follow-up. Participants also completed a feedback scale postintervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effectiveness of the SSIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 731 adolescents from 7 secondary schools were randomized. The intent-to-treat analysis found a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms. The mean and 95% CI at baseline were 6.8 (6.0-7.6) for SIGMA-Booster, 6.5 (5.8-7.3) for SIGMA, 7.0 (6.2-7.7) for SSIGP, and 6.9 (6.1-7.7) for ST. At the 2-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.7 (4.9-6.5) for SIGMA, 5.4 (4.6-6.2) for SSIGP, and 5.7 (4.9-6.4) for ST. At the 8-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.3 (4.5-6.0) for SIGMA, 5.6 (4.8-6.4) for SSIGP, and 5.8 (5.1-6.6) for ST. These reductions were observed across all 4 groups. Moderation analysis found that participants with higher motivation for change, higher baseline anxiety scores, and fixed mindsets showed greater improvements in anxiety symptoms. Most participants (459/731, 62.8%) viewed the feasibility and acceptability of the SSIs positively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSI for all 4 groups was effective in reducing anxiety and depression among adolescents over 8 weeks. Our data suggest the potential benefits of brief web-based interventions for adolescents, which could serve as scalable, destigmatized, and cost-effective alternatives to school-based programs. The intervention effects may have been underestimated, as this study did not exclude adolescents with minimal or no anxiety symptoms. Future studies should focus on the specific effects of interventions for adolescents with varying levels of anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05027880; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05027880.</p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":"8 ","pages":"e63500"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Web-Based Single-Session Growth Mindset Interventions for Reducing Adolescent Anxiety: Four-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Shimin Zhu, Yuxi Hu, Di Qi, Samson Tse, Ko Ling Chan, Jessica Sun, Paul Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/63500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health conditions worldwide, yet 65% of those affected do not access services. The high prevalence of anxiety and the low rate of intervention uptake highlight the urgent need to develop timely, scalable, and effective interventions suitable for adolescents. This study adapted existing single-session interventions (SSIs) to further develop an SSI focused on a growth mindset regarding negative emotions for adolescent mental health.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to compare the effectiveness of 4 SSIs, SSI of a growth mindset for anxiety (SIGMA), SIGMA with boosters (SIGMA-Booster), SSI of a growth mindset of personality (SSIGP), and an active control group (support therapy [ST]), in reducing adolescent anxiety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Classes from each secondary school were randomized to 1 of 4 intervention conditions: SIGMA, SIGMA-Booster, SSIGP, or ST. Each intervention took approximately 45 minutes online. Participants reported on anxiety symptoms (primary outcome), depressive symptoms, suicidal/self-harming thoughts, perceived control, hopelessness, attitude toward help-seeking, and psychological well-being (secondary outcomes) at preintervention, 2-week follow-up, and 8-week follow-up. Participants also completed a feedback scale postintervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effectiveness of the SSIs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 731 adolescents from 7 secondary schools were randomized. The intent-to-treat analysis found a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms. The mean and 95% CI at baseline were 6.8 (6.0-7.6) for SIGMA-Booster, 6.5 (5.8-7.3) for SIGMA, 7.0 (6.2-7.7) for SSIGP, and 6.9 (6.1-7.7) for ST. At the 2-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.7 (4.9-6.5) for SIGMA, 5.4 (4.6-6.2) for SSIGP, and 5.7 (4.9-6.4) for ST. At the 8-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.3 (4.5-6.0) for SIGMA, 5.6 (4.8-6.4) for SSIGP, and 5.8 (5.1-6.6) for ST. These reductions were observed across all 4 groups. Moderation analysis found that participants with higher motivation for change, higher baseline anxiety scores, and fixed mindsets showed greater improvements in anxiety symptoms. Most participants (459/731, 62.8%) viewed the feasibility and acceptability of the SSIs positively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The SSI for all 4 groups was effective in reducing anxiety and depression among adolescents over 8 weeks. Our data suggest the potential benefits of brief web-based interventions for adolescents, which could serve as scalable, destigmatized, and cost-effective alternatives to school-based programs. The intervention effects may have been underestimated, as this study did not exclude adolescents with minimal or no anxiety symptoms. Future studies should focus on the specific effects of interventions for adolescents with varying levels of anxiety symptoms.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05027880; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05027880.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"e63500\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12048788/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/63500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/63500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:焦虑症是全世界最常见的精神健康状况,但65%的受影响者无法获得服务。焦虑的高患病率和干预措施的低接受率突出表明迫切需要制定适合青少年的及时、可扩展和有效的干预措施。本研究对现有的单次干预(SSI)进行了调整,进一步开发了一种关注青少年负面情绪成长心态的SSI。目的:本研究旨在比较4种SSI,焦虑成长心态SSI (SIGMA), SIGMA- booster (SIGMA- booster),人格成长心态SSI (SSIGP)和积极对照组(支持治疗[ST])在减少青少年焦虑方面的效果。方法:每所中学的班级被随机分配到4种干预条件中的1种:SIGMA, SIGMA- booster, SSIGP或ST.每次干预在线约45分钟。在干预前、2周随访和8周随访中,参与者报告了焦虑症状(主要结局)、抑郁症状、自杀/自残想法、感知控制、绝望、寻求帮助的态度和心理健康(次要结局)。参与者还完成了干预后的反馈量表。使用广义估计方程来检验ssi的有效性。结果:随机抽取7所中学731名青少年。意向治疗分析发现焦虑症状显著减少。基线时,SIGMA- booster的平均值和95% CI为6.8 (6.0-7.6),SIGMA为6.5 (5.8-7.3),SSIGP为7.0 (6.2-7.7),st为6.9(6.1-7.7)。2周随访时,SIGMA- booster的平均值和95% CI为5.9 (5.1-6.7),SIGMA为5.7 (4.9-6.5),SSIGP为5.4 (4.6-6.2),st为5.7(4.9-6.4)。8周随访时,SIGMA- booster的平均值和95% CI为5.9 (5.1-6.7),SIGMA为5.3 (4.5-6.0),SSIGP为5.6(4.8-6.4)。st为5.8(5.1-6.6)。在所有4组中均观察到这些降低。适度分析发现,具有更高改变动机、更高基线焦虑得分和固定心态的参与者在焦虑症状方面表现出更大的改善。大多数参与者(459/731,62.8%)积极地看待ssi的可行性和可接受性。结论:在8周以上的时间里,所有4组的SSI都能有效地减少青少年的焦虑和抑郁。我们的数据表明,对青少年进行简短的基于网络的干预有潜在的好处,它可以作为一种可扩展的、去污名化的、具有成本效益的替代方案,以学校为基础的项目。干预效果可能被低估了,因为这项研究没有排除有轻微或没有焦虑症状的青少年。未来的研究应侧重于干预措施对具有不同程度焦虑症状的青少年的具体影响。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05027880;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05027880。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Web-Based Single-Session Growth Mindset Interventions for Reducing Adolescent Anxiety: Four-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health conditions worldwide, yet 65% of those affected do not access services. The high prevalence of anxiety and the low rate of intervention uptake highlight the urgent need to develop timely, scalable, and effective interventions suitable for adolescents. This study adapted existing single-session interventions (SSIs) to further develop an SSI focused on a growth mindset regarding negative emotions for adolescent mental health.

Objective: The study aims to compare the effectiveness of 4 SSIs, SSI of a growth mindset for anxiety (SIGMA), SIGMA with boosters (SIGMA-Booster), SSI of a growth mindset of personality (SSIGP), and an active control group (support therapy [ST]), in reducing adolescent anxiety.

Methods: Classes from each secondary school were randomized to 1 of 4 intervention conditions: SIGMA, SIGMA-Booster, SSIGP, or ST. Each intervention took approximately 45 minutes online. Participants reported on anxiety symptoms (primary outcome), depressive symptoms, suicidal/self-harming thoughts, perceived control, hopelessness, attitude toward help-seeking, and psychological well-being (secondary outcomes) at preintervention, 2-week follow-up, and 8-week follow-up. Participants also completed a feedback scale postintervention. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the effectiveness of the SSIs.

Results: A total of 731 adolescents from 7 secondary schools were randomized. The intent-to-treat analysis found a significant decrease in anxiety symptoms. The mean and 95% CI at baseline were 6.8 (6.0-7.6) for SIGMA-Booster, 6.5 (5.8-7.3) for SIGMA, 7.0 (6.2-7.7) for SSIGP, and 6.9 (6.1-7.7) for ST. At the 2-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.7 (4.9-6.5) for SIGMA, 5.4 (4.6-6.2) for SSIGP, and 5.7 (4.9-6.4) for ST. At the 8-week follow-up, the mean and 95% CI were 5.9 (5.1-6.7) for SIGMA-Booster, 5.3 (4.5-6.0) for SIGMA, 5.6 (4.8-6.4) for SSIGP, and 5.8 (5.1-6.6) for ST. These reductions were observed across all 4 groups. Moderation analysis found that participants with higher motivation for change, higher baseline anxiety scores, and fixed mindsets showed greater improvements in anxiety symptoms. Most participants (459/731, 62.8%) viewed the feasibility and acceptability of the SSIs positively.

Conclusions: The SSI for all 4 groups was effective in reducing anxiety and depression among adolescents over 8 weeks. Our data suggest the potential benefits of brief web-based interventions for adolescents, which could serve as scalable, destigmatized, and cost-effective alternatives to school-based programs. The intervention effects may have been underestimated, as this study did not exclude adolescents with minimal or no anxiety symptoms. Future studies should focus on the specific effects of interventions for adolescents with varying levels of anxiety symptoms.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05027880; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05027880.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信