神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100B作为手术中缺血性脑损伤的生物标志物。

IF 1.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Matej Makovec, Milan Skitek, Leja Šimnovec, Aleš Jerin
{"title":"神经元特异性烯醇化酶和S100B作为手术中缺血性脑损伤的生物标志物。","authors":"Matej Makovec, Milan Skitek, Leja Šimnovec, Aleš Jerin","doi":"10.3390/clinpract15040074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Biochemical markers can be used in addition to neuroimaging techniques to evaluate the extent of ischemic brain injuries and to enable earlier diagnosis and faster intervention following the ischemic event. Among the potential biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries during surgery, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B are the most frequently studied and were shown to be the most promising. The aim of this review was to summarize the role of NSE and S100B as biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries that occur during selected surgical procedures, predominantly carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Some other invasive interventions that cause ischemic brain injuries, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, were also included. We can conclude that these biomarkers can be useful for the evaluation of ischemic brain injuries that occur during various surgical procedures. They can help to determine the most optimal conditions for performing the surgery and therefore improve the procedures to consequently minimize brain damage caused during surgery. Because of a significant delay between sample collection and obtaining the results, they are not suitable for real-time assessment of brain injuries. Some improvement can be expected with the future development of laboratory methods. The association of the changes in NSE and S100B levels during surgery with potential consequences of ischemic brain injury have been described in numerous studies. However, even in a very homogenous group of surgical procedures like CEA, these findings cannot be summarized into a common final conclusion; therefore, the prognostic value of the two markers is not clearly supported at the present time.</p>","PeriodicalId":45306,"journal":{"name":"Clinics and Practice","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026299/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100B as Biomarkers of Ischemic Brain Injury During Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Matej Makovec, Milan Skitek, Leja Šimnovec, Aleš Jerin\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/clinpract15040074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Biochemical markers can be used in addition to neuroimaging techniques to evaluate the extent of ischemic brain injuries and to enable earlier diagnosis and faster intervention following the ischemic event. Among the potential biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries during surgery, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B are the most frequently studied and were shown to be the most promising. The aim of this review was to summarize the role of NSE and S100B as biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries that occur during selected surgical procedures, predominantly carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Some other invasive interventions that cause ischemic brain injuries, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, were also included. We can conclude that these biomarkers can be useful for the evaluation of ischemic brain injuries that occur during various surgical procedures. They can help to determine the most optimal conditions for performing the surgery and therefore improve the procedures to consequently minimize brain damage caused during surgery. Because of a significant delay between sample collection and obtaining the results, they are not suitable for real-time assessment of brain injuries. Some improvement can be expected with the future development of laboratory methods. The association of the changes in NSE and S100B levels during surgery with potential consequences of ischemic brain injury have been described in numerous studies. However, even in a very homogenous group of surgical procedures like CEA, these findings cannot be summarized into a common final conclusion; therefore, the prognostic value of the two markers is not clearly supported at the present time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12026299/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinics and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15040074\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15040074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

除神经影像学技术外,生物化学标志物可用于评估缺血性脑损伤的程度,并可在缺血性事件发生后进行早期诊断和快速干预。在手术中缺血性脑损伤的潜在生物标志物中,神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和S100B是研究最多且最有前途的。本综述的目的是总结NSE和S100B作为缺血性脑损伤生物标志物的作用,这些缺血性脑损伤发生在选定的外科手术中,主要是颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)。其他一些引起缺血性脑损伤的侵入性干预,如体外膜氧合,也包括在内。我们可以得出结论,这些生物标志物可用于评估在各种外科手术过程中发生的缺血性脑损伤。它们可以帮助确定进行手术的最佳条件,从而改进手术程序,从而最大限度地减少手术中造成的脑损伤。由于样本收集和获得结果之间存在明显的延迟,因此它们不适合实时评估脑损伤。随着实验室方法的未来发展,可以预期会有一些改进。手术过程中NSE和S100B水平的变化与缺血性脑损伤的潜在后果之间的关系已在许多研究中得到描述。然而,即使在一组非常相同的外科手术中,如CEA,这些发现也不能总结为一个共同的最终结论;因此,这两种标志物的预后价值目前尚不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Neuron-Specific Enolase and S100B as Biomarkers of Ischemic Brain Injury During Surgery.

Biochemical markers can be used in addition to neuroimaging techniques to evaluate the extent of ischemic brain injuries and to enable earlier diagnosis and faster intervention following the ischemic event. Among the potential biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries during surgery, neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and S100B are the most frequently studied and were shown to be the most promising. The aim of this review was to summarize the role of NSE and S100B as biomarkers of ischemic brain injuries that occur during selected surgical procedures, predominantly carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Some other invasive interventions that cause ischemic brain injuries, like extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, were also included. We can conclude that these biomarkers can be useful for the evaluation of ischemic brain injuries that occur during various surgical procedures. They can help to determine the most optimal conditions for performing the surgery and therefore improve the procedures to consequently minimize brain damage caused during surgery. Because of a significant delay between sample collection and obtaining the results, they are not suitable for real-time assessment of brain injuries. Some improvement can be expected with the future development of laboratory methods. The association of the changes in NSE and S100B levels during surgery with potential consequences of ischemic brain injury have been described in numerous studies. However, even in a very homogenous group of surgical procedures like CEA, these findings cannot be summarized into a common final conclusion; therefore, the prognostic value of the two markers is not clearly supported at the present time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinics and Practice
Clinics and Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信