经胫骨假体悬浮系统的健康经济评估:使用观察性研究和合成队列的试点方案。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Leigh Clarke, Alan Shiell, Michael P Dillon
{"title":"经胫骨假体悬浮系统的健康经济评估:使用观察性研究和合成队列的试点方案。","authors":"Leigh Clarke, Alan Shiell, Michael P Dillon","doi":"10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) provide the necessary evidence of cost-benefit to inform policy and investment decisions. No HEEs have quantified the cost-benefit of passive suction (PS) vs vacuum assisted suction (VAS) suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users. There are methodological challenges to conducting HEE in prosthetics given the benefit measures are not focused on the things most important to prosthesis users and funders, and the required time horizons are lengthy. To address these challenges, we propose a pilot study using two PROMIS instruments to measure benefits and trial the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method, to quantify the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of PS and VAS suspension for people living with trans-tibial amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study will measure the costs and benefits of PS and VAS suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users using a Synthetic Cohort Method, a technique used in epidemiological modelling of life-time risks. Each intervention will include 3 sub-groups, representing prosthesis users in the first, second, or third year of the intervention since fitting. A prosthetic payor perspective will be taken, with data collected over a 1-year period and synthesised to reflect the costs and benefits over a 3-year time horizon. Benefits will be measured using two PROMIS instruments reported to best measure the benefits most important to prosthesis users and funders. Costs will be calculated from actual billable costs to the funder. Costs and benefits will be discounted at 4%. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility will be calculated using the incremental costs and incremental benefits, with results presented as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility ratios. Bootstrapping will be undertaken to assess uncertainty, and discounting will be analysed through a one-way sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pilot will make a novel contribution by trailing the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method to reduce the lengthy time horizons required in prosthetic HEE. The HEE will use a two-pronged approach whereby cost-utility and cost-effectiveness are simultaneously evaluated using the PROMIS instruments to inform a wide range of policy and investment decisions. Additionally, this pilot will be the first HEE of suction suspension systems for people with transtibial amputation and will therefore make an important contribution to the prosthetic evidence base.</p>","PeriodicalId":47054,"journal":{"name":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","volume":"23 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993941/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health economic evaluation of trans-tibial prosthetic suspension systems: a protocol for a pilot using an observational study and synthetic cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Leigh Clarke, Alan Shiell, Michael P Dillon\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) provide the necessary evidence of cost-benefit to inform policy and investment decisions. No HEEs have quantified the cost-benefit of passive suction (PS) vs vacuum assisted suction (VAS) suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users. There are methodological challenges to conducting HEE in prosthetics given the benefit measures are not focused on the things most important to prosthesis users and funders, and the required time horizons are lengthy. To address these challenges, we propose a pilot study using two PROMIS instruments to measure benefits and trial the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method, to quantify the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of PS and VAS suspension for people living with trans-tibial amputation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational study will measure the costs and benefits of PS and VAS suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users using a Synthetic Cohort Method, a technique used in epidemiological modelling of life-time risks. Each intervention will include 3 sub-groups, representing prosthesis users in the first, second, or third year of the intervention since fitting. A prosthetic payor perspective will be taken, with data collected over a 1-year period and synthesised to reflect the costs and benefits over a 3-year time horizon. Benefits will be measured using two PROMIS instruments reported to best measure the benefits most important to prosthesis users and funders. Costs will be calculated from actual billable costs to the funder. Costs and benefits will be discounted at 4%. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility will be calculated using the incremental costs and incremental benefits, with results presented as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility ratios. Bootstrapping will be undertaken to assess uncertainty, and discounting will be analysed through a one-way sensitivity analysis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This pilot will make a novel contribution by trailing the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method to reduce the lengthy time horizons required in prosthetic HEE. The HEE will use a two-pronged approach whereby cost-utility and cost-effectiveness are simultaneously evaluated using the PROMIS instruments to inform a wide range of policy and investment decisions. Additionally, this pilot will be the first HEE of suction suspension systems for people with transtibial amputation and will therefore make an important contribution to the prosthetic evidence base.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993941/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-025-00611-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:卫生经济评价(HEEs)为政策和投资决策提供必要的成本效益证据。没有HEEs量化被动吸吸(PS)与真空辅助吸吸(VAS)悬浮对经胫骨假体使用者的成本效益。在义肢中实施HEE存在方法论上的挑战,因为效益措施没有集中在对义肢使用者和资助者最重要的事情上,而且所需的时间跨度很长。为了解决这些挑战,我们提出了一项试点研究,使用两种PROMIS仪器来衡量效益,并尝试使用合成队列方法,量化PS和VAS暂停对胫骨截肢患者的成本效益和成本效用。方法:一项观察性研究将使用合成队列方法(一种用于终身风险流行病学建模的技术)衡量PS和VAS悬吊对经胫骨假体使用者的成本和收益。每个干预将包括3个亚组,代表自拟合以来干预的第一年、第二年或第三年的义肢使用者。将采取假体付款人的观点,收集1年期间的数据,并综合反映3年时间范围内的成本和收益。将使用两种PROMIS仪器来衡量对义肢使用者和资助者最重要的益处。费用将按实际支付给出资人的费用计算。成本和收益按4%折现。成本效益和成本效用将使用增量成本和增量收益来计算,结果以增量成本效益和增量成本效用比表示。将采用自举法来评估不确定性,并通过单向敏感性分析来分析贴现。讨论:该试点将通过跟踪使用合成队列方法来减少义肢HEE所需的长时间范围,从而做出新的贡献。HEE将采用双管齐下的方法,利用PROMIS工具同时评估成本效用和成本效益,为广泛的政策和投资决策提供信息。此外,该试点将是第一个用于胫骨截肢患者的吸痰悬浮系统的HEE,因此将为假肢证据基础做出重要贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health economic evaluation of trans-tibial prosthetic suspension systems: a protocol for a pilot using an observational study and synthetic cohort.

Background: Health Economic Evaluations (HEEs) provide the necessary evidence of cost-benefit to inform policy and investment decisions. No HEEs have quantified the cost-benefit of passive suction (PS) vs vacuum assisted suction (VAS) suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users. There are methodological challenges to conducting HEE in prosthetics given the benefit measures are not focused on the things most important to prosthesis users and funders, and the required time horizons are lengthy. To address these challenges, we propose a pilot study using two PROMIS instruments to measure benefits and trial the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method, to quantify the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of PS and VAS suspension for people living with trans-tibial amputation.

Methods: An observational study will measure the costs and benefits of PS and VAS suspension for trans-tibial prosthesis users using a Synthetic Cohort Method, a technique used in epidemiological modelling of life-time risks. Each intervention will include 3 sub-groups, representing prosthesis users in the first, second, or third year of the intervention since fitting. A prosthetic payor perspective will be taken, with data collected over a 1-year period and synthesised to reflect the costs and benefits over a 3-year time horizon. Benefits will be measured using two PROMIS instruments reported to best measure the benefits most important to prosthesis users and funders. Costs will be calculated from actual billable costs to the funder. Costs and benefits will be discounted at 4%. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility will be calculated using the incremental costs and incremental benefits, with results presented as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-utility ratios. Bootstrapping will be undertaken to assess uncertainty, and discounting will be analysed through a one-way sensitivity analysis.

Discussion: This pilot will make a novel contribution by trailing the use of a Synthetic Cohort Method to reduce the lengthy time horizons required in prosthetic HEE. The HEE will use a two-pronged approach whereby cost-utility and cost-effectiveness are simultaneously evaluated using the PROMIS instruments to inform a wide range of policy and investment decisions. Additionally, this pilot will be the first HEE of suction suspension systems for people with transtibial amputation and will therefore make an important contribution to the prosthetic evidence base.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
59
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊介绍: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of cost-effectiveness analysis, including conceptual or methodological work, economic evaluations, and policy analysis related to resource allocation at a national or international level. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation is aimed at health economists, health services researchers, and policy-makers with an interest in enhancing the flow and transfer of knowledge relating to efficiency in the health sector. Manuscripts are encouraged from researchers based in low- and middle-income countries, with a view to increasing the international economic evidence base for health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信