环境、技术还是健康?信息干预对农户生活垃圾分类意愿的影响。

IF 3.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Hao Meng, Limin Zhang, Yong Xia, Xianjin Huang, Xiaofeng Zhao, Honggen Zhu
{"title":"环境、技术还是健康?信息干预对农户生活垃圾分类意愿的影响。","authors":"Hao Meng, Limin Zhang, Yong Xia, Xianjin Huang, Xiaofeng Zhao, Honggen Zhu","doi":"10.1177/0734242X251329014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Source separation is a pivotal strategy for addressing rural domestic waste pollution, significantly influencing the efficacy of the Reduce, Reuse and Recycle principles in waste management. Information interventions should be valued to address the deficiencies in economic policies that encourage waste separation. What kind of information intervention can best improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention? Eight random intervention experimental groups were designed, including three single information intervention groups on topics such as environmental, technical and health issues, four interactive information intervention groups and one control group. Based on 904 valid samples of farmers were collected in Taihu Lake Basin of China, ordered probit and difference-in-differences models were constructed to achieve the goals of this study. The main conclusions are as follows. The experimental effect of health information intervention was the best, which impacted positively on the intention of farmers to separate domestic waste by 17.94%. The effect of the environmental information intervention was 14.59%. However, the test failed in the technical information intervention. The interactive information interventions' effect was only 60.18% of the single information intervention, arguably due to information overload. The findings of this study help find out how to choose the appropriate information intervention content and way to improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention.</p>","PeriodicalId":23671,"journal":{"name":"Waste Management & Research","volume":" ","pages":"734242X251329014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Environmental, technical or health? The influence of information intervention on farmers' domestic waste separation intention.\",\"authors\":\"Hao Meng, Limin Zhang, Yong Xia, Xianjin Huang, Xiaofeng Zhao, Honggen Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0734242X251329014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Source separation is a pivotal strategy for addressing rural domestic waste pollution, significantly influencing the efficacy of the Reduce, Reuse and Recycle principles in waste management. Information interventions should be valued to address the deficiencies in economic policies that encourage waste separation. What kind of information intervention can best improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention? Eight random intervention experimental groups were designed, including three single information intervention groups on topics such as environmental, technical and health issues, four interactive information intervention groups and one control group. Based on 904 valid samples of farmers were collected in Taihu Lake Basin of China, ordered probit and difference-in-differences models were constructed to achieve the goals of this study. The main conclusions are as follows. The experimental effect of health information intervention was the best, which impacted positively on the intention of farmers to separate domestic waste by 17.94%. The effect of the environmental information intervention was 14.59%. However, the test failed in the technical information intervention. The interactive information interventions' effect was only 60.18% of the single information intervention, arguably due to information overload. The findings of this study help find out how to choose the appropriate information intervention content and way to improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23671,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Waste Management & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"734242X251329014\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Waste Management & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X251329014\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Waste Management & Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X251329014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

源头分离是解决农村生活垃圾污染的关键战略,对废物管理中减量、再利用和再循环原则的效果有重大影响。应当重视信息干预措施,以解决鼓励废物分类的经济政策的不足之处。什么样的信息干预最能提高农户的生活垃圾分类意愿?设计了8个随机干预实验组,包括3个关于环境、技术和健康问题的单一信息干预组,4个交互式信息干预组和1个对照组。基于太湖流域904个有效农户样本,构建了有序probit模型和差中差模型。主要结论如下:健康信息干预的实验效果最好,对农户生活垃圾分类意愿的正向影响为17.94%。环境信息干预的效果为14.59%。但是,技术信息干预测试失败。交互式信息干预的效果仅为单一信息干预的60.18%,可能是由于信息超载。本研究的结果有助于找出如何选择合适的信息干预内容和方式来提高农民的生活垃圾分类意愿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Environmental, technical or health? The influence of information intervention on farmers' domestic waste separation intention.

Source separation is a pivotal strategy for addressing rural domestic waste pollution, significantly influencing the efficacy of the Reduce, Reuse and Recycle principles in waste management. Information interventions should be valued to address the deficiencies in economic policies that encourage waste separation. What kind of information intervention can best improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention? Eight random intervention experimental groups were designed, including three single information intervention groups on topics such as environmental, technical and health issues, four interactive information intervention groups and one control group. Based on 904 valid samples of farmers were collected in Taihu Lake Basin of China, ordered probit and difference-in-differences models were constructed to achieve the goals of this study. The main conclusions are as follows. The experimental effect of health information intervention was the best, which impacted positively on the intention of farmers to separate domestic waste by 17.94%. The effect of the environmental information intervention was 14.59%. However, the test failed in the technical information intervention. The interactive information interventions' effect was only 60.18% of the single information intervention, arguably due to information overload. The findings of this study help find out how to choose the appropriate information intervention content and way to improve farmers' domestic waste separation intention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Waste Management & Research
Waste Management & Research 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
232
审稿时长
4.1 months
期刊介绍: Waste Management & Research (WM&R) publishes peer-reviewed articles relating to both the theory and practice of waste management and research. Published on behalf of the International Solid Waste Association (ISWA) topics include: wastes (focus on solids), processes and technologies, management systems and tools, and policy and regulatory frameworks, sustainable waste management designs, operations, policies or practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信