{"title":"写睡眠日记会改变人们对睡眠质量的看法吗?健康成人的测试测量反应性。","authors":"L Tollånes, S H D Nielsen, C E Parsons","doi":"10.1080/15402002.2025.2476689","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Measurement reactivity, where the act of measuring a behavior changes that behavior, has been documented across various health outcomes. However, its effects on sleep remain understudied, despite the widespread use of sleep diaries in clinical and research settings. In this randomized experiment, 190 healthy young adults (aged 18-40 years; 63% female) were assigned to complete either a sleep diary (Consensus Sleep Diary) or a physical activity diary (Physical Activity Scale) for seven days. All participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) before and after the diary period. Daily diary completion rates were high (97.3%). Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant main effects of time (pre vs. post) or condition (sleep vs. physical activity diary), and no significant interaction between time and condition for either PSQI or IPAQ scores. These results suggest stability in sleep quality and physical activity measures, with no evidence of measurement reactivity. An exploratory analysis comparing \"good\" and \"poor\" sleepers (based on baseline PSQI scores) found a significant effect of sleep quality group and a time × group interaction on PSQI scores. In this adequately powered short-term study of young adults, we found no evidence of measurement reactivity to daily sleep diaries. These findings suggest that in healthy individuals, completing a week of sleep diaries is unlikely to impact PSQI scores substantially. We discuss our results in terms of the direct controllability of sleep quality, which might make it less susceptible to measurement reactivity relative to other health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55393,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","volume":"23 3","pages":"385-399"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Keeping a Sleep Diary Alter the Perception of Sleep Quality? Testing Measurement Reactivity in Healthy Adults.\",\"authors\":\"L Tollånes, S H D Nielsen, C E Parsons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15402002.2025.2476689\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Measurement reactivity, where the act of measuring a behavior changes that behavior, has been documented across various health outcomes. However, its effects on sleep remain understudied, despite the widespread use of sleep diaries in clinical and research settings. In this randomized experiment, 190 healthy young adults (aged 18-40 years; 63% female) were assigned to complete either a sleep diary (Consensus Sleep Diary) or a physical activity diary (Physical Activity Scale) for seven days. All participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) before and after the diary period. Daily diary completion rates were high (97.3%). Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant main effects of time (pre vs. post) or condition (sleep vs. physical activity diary), and no significant interaction between time and condition for either PSQI or IPAQ scores. These results suggest stability in sleep quality and physical activity measures, with no evidence of measurement reactivity. An exploratory analysis comparing \\\"good\\\" and \\\"poor\\\" sleepers (based on baseline PSQI scores) found a significant effect of sleep quality group and a time × group interaction on PSQI scores. In this adequately powered short-term study of young adults, we found no evidence of measurement reactivity to daily sleep diaries. These findings suggest that in healthy individuals, completing a week of sleep diaries is unlikely to impact PSQI scores substantially. We discuss our results in terms of the direct controllability of sleep quality, which might make it less susceptible to measurement reactivity relative to other health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 3\",\"pages\":\"385-399\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Sleep Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2025.2476689\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Sleep Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15402002.2025.2476689","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does Keeping a Sleep Diary Alter the Perception of Sleep Quality? Testing Measurement Reactivity in Healthy Adults.
Measurement reactivity, where the act of measuring a behavior changes that behavior, has been documented across various health outcomes. However, its effects on sleep remain understudied, despite the widespread use of sleep diaries in clinical and research settings. In this randomized experiment, 190 healthy young adults (aged 18-40 years; 63% female) were assigned to complete either a sleep diary (Consensus Sleep Diary) or a physical activity diary (Physical Activity Scale) for seven days. All participants completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) before and after the diary period. Daily diary completion rates were high (97.3%). Linear mixed-effects models revealed no significant main effects of time (pre vs. post) or condition (sleep vs. physical activity diary), and no significant interaction between time and condition for either PSQI or IPAQ scores. These results suggest stability in sleep quality and physical activity measures, with no evidence of measurement reactivity. An exploratory analysis comparing "good" and "poor" sleepers (based on baseline PSQI scores) found a significant effect of sleep quality group and a time × group interaction on PSQI scores. In this adequately powered short-term study of young adults, we found no evidence of measurement reactivity to daily sleep diaries. These findings suggest that in healthy individuals, completing a week of sleep diaries is unlikely to impact PSQI scores substantially. We discuss our results in terms of the direct controllability of sleep quality, which might make it less susceptible to measurement reactivity relative to other health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Sleep Medicine addresses behavioral dimensions of normal and abnormal sleep mechanisms and the prevention, assessment, and treatment of sleep disorders and associated behavioral and emotional problems. Standards for interventions acceptable to this journal are guided by established principles of behavior change. Intending to serve as the intellectual home for the application of behavioral/cognitive science to the study of normal and disordered sleep, the journal paints a broad stroke across the behavioral sleep medicine landscape. Its content includes scholarly investigation of such areas as normal sleep experience, insomnia, the relation of daytime functioning to sleep, parasomnias, circadian rhythm disorders, treatment adherence, pediatrics, and geriatrics. Multidisciplinary approaches are particularly welcome. The journal’ domain encompasses human basic, applied, and clinical outcome research. Behavioral Sleep Medicine also embraces methodological diversity, spanning innovative case studies, quasi-experimentation, randomized trials, epidemiology, and critical reviews.