关节镜下踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节骨关节炎。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, William J Ribbans, José M Olmo-Jiménez, Alberto D Delgado-Martínez
{"title":"关节镜下踝关节融合术治疗终末期踝关节骨关节炎。","authors":"E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, William J Ribbans, José M Olmo-Jiménez, Alberto D Delgado-Martínez","doi":"10.1530/EOR-2023-0100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has been performed for 40 years for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Along with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and total ankle replacement (TAR), it forms one arm of the triumvirate of commonly performed procedures for this condition. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art for AAA and compare outcomes with OAA and TAR. This narrative review of the literature traces the development of this technique through case series and systematic reviews. Traditional OAA techniques carry a nonunion rate of 11%, necessitating revision surgery in most cases. As individual and communal experience of AAA has grown, the range of pathology and deformity successfully corrected by this technique has developed. There is evidence that AAA offers greater and more rapid union rates, with reduced hospital stay and better long-term outcomes. However, the technique requires mature surgical skills and still carries a significant complication rate. No single procedure is suitable for all patients. AAA can be seen as the new gold standard for patients with isolated ankle osteoarthritis and no/minimal deformity, either within the talocrural joint or hindfoot or patients with systemic and/or local comorbidities that would benefit from minimal disturbance to the soft-tissue envelope. However, in older patients, the presence of concomitant hindfoot osteoarthritis or significant deformity, TAR and OAA remain valuable procedures in the foot and ankle surgeon's armamentarium.</p>","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":"10 5","pages":"213-223"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061018/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"E Carlos Rodríguez-Merchán, William J Ribbans, José M Olmo-Jiménez, Alberto D Delgado-Martínez\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/EOR-2023-0100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has been performed for 40 years for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Along with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and total ankle replacement (TAR), it forms one arm of the triumvirate of commonly performed procedures for this condition. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art for AAA and compare outcomes with OAA and TAR. This narrative review of the literature traces the development of this technique through case series and systematic reviews. Traditional OAA techniques carry a nonunion rate of 11%, necessitating revision surgery in most cases. As individual and communal experience of AAA has grown, the range of pathology and deformity successfully corrected by this technique has developed. There is evidence that AAA offers greater and more rapid union rates, with reduced hospital stay and better long-term outcomes. However, the technique requires mature surgical skills and still carries a significant complication rate. No single procedure is suitable for all patients. AAA can be seen as the new gold standard for patients with isolated ankle osteoarthritis and no/minimal deformity, either within the talocrural joint or hindfoot or patients with systemic and/or local comorbidities that would benefit from minimal disturbance to the soft-tissue envelope. However, in older patients, the presence of concomitant hindfoot osteoarthritis or significant deformity, TAR and OAA remain valuable procedures in the foot and ankle surgeon's armamentarium.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"213-223\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12061018/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Efort Open Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2023-0100\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/EOR-2023-0100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关节镜下踝关节融合术(AAA)治疗终末期踝关节骨关节炎已有40年的历史。与开放式踝关节融合术(OAA)和全踝关节置换术(TAR)一起,它构成了治疗这种疾病的三种常用手术之一。本文的目的是回顾AAA的最新进展,并将其与OAA和TAR的结果进行比较。这篇文献的叙事性回顾通过案例系列和系统回顾追溯了这一技术的发展。传统的OAA技术有11%的不愈合率,在大多数情况下需要翻修手术。随着AAA的个人和集体经验的增长,该技术成功纠正的病理和畸形范围也在扩大。有证据表明,AAA的合并率更高、更快,住院时间更短,长期预后更好。然而,这项技术需要成熟的手术技巧,并且仍然有很大的并发症发生率。没有一种手术方法适合所有患者。AAA可被视为孤立性踝关节骨关节炎患者的新金标准,无论是距胫腓关节或后足,还是有全身和/或局部合并症的患者,都将受益于对软组织包膜的最小干扰。然而,对于伴有后脚骨关节炎或明显畸形的老年患者,TAR和OAA仍然是足部和踝关节外科医生的宝贵手术手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis.

Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis (AAA) has been performed for 40 years for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Along with open ankle arthrodesis (OAA) and total ankle replacement (TAR), it forms one arm of the triumvirate of commonly performed procedures for this condition. The aim of this article is to review the state of the art for AAA and compare outcomes with OAA and TAR. This narrative review of the literature traces the development of this technique through case series and systematic reviews. Traditional OAA techniques carry a nonunion rate of 11%, necessitating revision surgery in most cases. As individual and communal experience of AAA has grown, the range of pathology and deformity successfully corrected by this technique has developed. There is evidence that AAA offers greater and more rapid union rates, with reduced hospital stay and better long-term outcomes. However, the technique requires mature surgical skills and still carries a significant complication rate. No single procedure is suitable for all patients. AAA can be seen as the new gold standard for patients with isolated ankle osteoarthritis and no/minimal deformity, either within the talocrural joint or hindfoot or patients with systemic and/or local comorbidities that would benefit from minimal disturbance to the soft-tissue envelope. However, in older patients, the presence of concomitant hindfoot osteoarthritis or significant deformity, TAR and OAA remain valuable procedures in the foot and ankle surgeon's armamentarium.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信