物理治疗教育博士课程学生对人工智能的认知。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-03 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2025.2496978
Rachel Reoli, Victoria Marchese, Aryaan Duggal, Kelby Kaplan
{"title":"物理治疗教育博士课程学生对人工智能的认知。","authors":"Rachel Reoli, Victoria Marchese, Aryaan Duggal, Kelby Kaplan","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2025.2496978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health profession education is impacted by developments in artificial intelligence (AI). While AI provides useful supplemental material, it is unknown how it will affect learning complex clinical topics. Artificial intelligence has the potential to be a powerful tool when used in tandem with traditional human studying methods. This study aims to understand Doctor of Physical Therapy students' perceptions of AI as a study tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students participated in an online pre/post survey evaluating their perceptions of AI's ability to diagnose and treat clinical cases, and two corresponding research activities where students were asked to complete a neurologic case study using classroom notes and a separate case using AI. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect sizes were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three first year Doctor of Physical Therapy students volunteered to participate. In the post-survey, students' perceptions of AI included increased trust to provide a clinical diagnosis (<i>p</i> = .001; <i>r</i> = 0.66) and a treatment plan (<i>p</i> = .005; <i>r</i> = 0.58), and to consider patient-centered plans of care (<i>p</i> = .036; <i>r</i> = 0.44). There was no significant difference following the research activities about concern handling sensitive information (<i>p</i> = .499), replacing a human clinician (<i>p</i> = .255), or the need for human oversight (<i>p</i> = .833).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of AI as a study tool is rapidly developing. This study showed that students' perceptions of AI were significantly more positive after an exposure of clinical course application. These results are beneficial to educators to ensure that students are shown the practical applications of AI throughout learning strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2112-2117"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student perceptions of artificial intelligence in Doctor of Physical Therapy Education.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel Reoli, Victoria Marchese, Aryaan Duggal, Kelby Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593985.2025.2496978\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health profession education is impacted by developments in artificial intelligence (AI). While AI provides useful supplemental material, it is unknown how it will affect learning complex clinical topics. Artificial intelligence has the potential to be a powerful tool when used in tandem with traditional human studying methods. This study aims to understand Doctor of Physical Therapy students' perceptions of AI as a study tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Students participated in an online pre/post survey evaluating their perceptions of AI's ability to diagnose and treat clinical cases, and two corresponding research activities where students were asked to complete a neurologic case study using classroom notes and a separate case using AI. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect sizes were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three first year Doctor of Physical Therapy students volunteered to participate. In the post-survey, students' perceptions of AI included increased trust to provide a clinical diagnosis (<i>p</i> = .001; <i>r</i> = 0.66) and a treatment plan (<i>p</i> = .005; <i>r</i> = 0.58), and to consider patient-centered plans of care (<i>p</i> = .036; <i>r</i> = 0.44). There was no significant difference following the research activities about concern handling sensitive information (<i>p</i> = .499), replacing a human clinician (<i>p</i> = .255), or the need for human oversight (<i>p</i> = .833).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of AI as a study tool is rapidly developing. This study showed that students' perceptions of AI were significantly more positive after an exposure of clinical course application. These results are beneficial to educators to ensure that students are shown the practical applications of AI throughout learning strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48699,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2112-2117\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2496978\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2025.2496978","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卫生专业教育受到人工智能(AI)发展的影响。虽然人工智能提供了有用的补充材料,但尚不清楚它将如何影响学习复杂的临床主题。当与传统的人类学习方法结合使用时,人工智能有可能成为一种强大的工具。本研究旨在了解物理治疗博士学生对人工智能作为学习工具的看法。方法:学生参加了一项在线前/后调查,评估他们对人工智能诊断和治疗临床病例能力的看法,以及两项相应的研究活动,其中学生被要求使用课堂笔记完成一个神经学案例研究,并使用人工智能完成一个单独的案例。计算描述性统计、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和效应量。结果:23名物理治疗博士一年级学生自愿参与。在之后的调查中,学生对人工智能的看法包括增加了对提供临床诊断的信任(p = .001;R = 0.66)和治疗方案(p = 0.005;R = 0.58),并考虑以患者为中心的护理计划(p = 0.036;r = 0.44)。在关注处理敏感信息(p = .499)、替代人类临床医生(p = .255)或需要人类监督(p = .833)的研究活动之后,没有显著差异。结论:人工智能作为学习工具的使用正在迅速发展。本研究表明,接触临床课程应用后,学生对人工智能的认知明显更加积极。这些结果有利于教育工作者确保学生在学习策略中看到人工智能的实际应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student perceptions of artificial intelligence in Doctor of Physical Therapy Education.

Purpose: Health profession education is impacted by developments in artificial intelligence (AI). While AI provides useful supplemental material, it is unknown how it will affect learning complex clinical topics. Artificial intelligence has the potential to be a powerful tool when used in tandem with traditional human studying methods. This study aims to understand Doctor of Physical Therapy students' perceptions of AI as a study tool.

Methods: Students participated in an online pre/post survey evaluating their perceptions of AI's ability to diagnose and treat clinical cases, and two corresponding research activities where students were asked to complete a neurologic case study using classroom notes and a separate case using AI. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and effect sizes were calculated.

Results: Twenty-three first year Doctor of Physical Therapy students volunteered to participate. In the post-survey, students' perceptions of AI included increased trust to provide a clinical diagnosis (p = .001; r = 0.66) and a treatment plan (p = .005; r = 0.58), and to consider patient-centered plans of care (p = .036; r = 0.44). There was no significant difference following the research activities about concern handling sensitive information (p = .499), replacing a human clinician (p = .255), or the need for human oversight (p = .833).

Conclusion: The use of AI as a study tool is rapidly developing. This study showed that students' perceptions of AI were significantly more positive after an exposure of clinical course application. These results are beneficial to educators to ensure that students are shown the practical applications of AI throughout learning strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信