中国古典园林真实与虚拟现实观景效果比较研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Yanning Cai, Minkai Sun, Yudie Lu, Yuqin Wang, Jian Zhang, Seiko Goto
{"title":"中国古典园林真实与虚拟现实观景效果比较研究。","authors":"Yanning Cai, Minkai Sun, Yudie Lu, Yuqin Wang, Jian Zhang, Seiko Goto","doi":"10.1177/19375867251330834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study evaluates the relaxation effects of viewing a Chinese classical garden and a Chinese-style public park in reality and virtual reality (VR) environments by focusing on their psychological and physiological impacts. <b>Background:</b> The experiment examined two landscapes: the culturally rich and elaborately designed Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-eight participants participated in four sessions, each consisting of a 5-minute viewing session of the Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion under Conditions A (real) and B (VR). Each session was evaluated using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire, the Semantic Differences Scale, the Supplemental Questionnaire, and eye tracking technology. <b>Results:</b> In Condition A, POMS scores, Semantic Differential Scale ratings, the Supplemental Questionnaire results, and eye movement patterns indicated that viewing the Humble Administrator's Garden resulted in greater relaxation compared to the Hefeng Pavilion. Similar findings were observed in Condition B, reinforcing the Humble Administrator's Garden's relaxing effect. However, there was a noticeable disparity in the relaxation effects between Conditions B and A, with real settings offering more pronounced benefits. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrated that the culturally rich Humble Administrator's Garden significantly improves mood more effectively than the Hefeng Pavilion, whether viewed in real or VR environments. This study suggests that although VR can offer an immersive experience, it may not fully capture the sensory richness and therapeutic benefits of actual garden environments. Real settings delivered more substantial relaxation effects compared to VR settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47306,"journal":{"name":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","volume":" ","pages":"19375867251330834"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on the Effects of Viewing Real and Virtual Reality Classical Chinese Gardens.\",\"authors\":\"Yanning Cai, Minkai Sun, Yudie Lu, Yuqin Wang, Jian Zhang, Seiko Goto\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19375867251330834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study evaluates the relaxation effects of viewing a Chinese classical garden and a Chinese-style public park in reality and virtual reality (VR) environments by focusing on their psychological and physiological impacts. <b>Background:</b> The experiment examined two landscapes: the culturally rich and elaborately designed Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion. <b>Methods:</b> Twenty-eight participants participated in four sessions, each consisting of a 5-minute viewing session of the Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion under Conditions A (real) and B (VR). Each session was evaluated using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire, the Semantic Differences Scale, the Supplemental Questionnaire, and eye tracking technology. <b>Results:</b> In Condition A, POMS scores, Semantic Differential Scale ratings, the Supplemental Questionnaire results, and eye movement patterns indicated that viewing the Humble Administrator's Garden resulted in greater relaxation compared to the Hefeng Pavilion. Similar findings were observed in Condition B, reinforcing the Humble Administrator's Garden's relaxing effect. However, there was a noticeable disparity in the relaxation effects between Conditions B and A, with real settings offering more pronounced benefits. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study demonstrated that the culturally rich Humble Administrator's Garden significantly improves mood more effectively than the Hefeng Pavilion, whether viewed in real or VR environments. This study suggests that although VR can offer an immersive experience, it may not fully capture the sensory richness and therapeutic benefits of actual garden environments. Real settings delivered more substantial relaxation effects compared to VR settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"19375867251330834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251330834\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867251330834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究通过对现实和虚拟现实(VR)环境中中国古典园林和中国式公园的心理和生理影响来评估其放松效果。背景:实验考察了两个景观:文化丰富且精心设计的拙政园和和风亭。方法:28名参与者参加4个阶段,每个阶段5分钟,分别在a(真实)和B(虚拟)条件下观看拙政园和和风阁。每个会话使用心境状态问卷、语义差异量表、补充问卷和眼动追踪技术进行评估。结果:在A条件下,POMS评分、语义差异量表评分、补充问卷结果和眼动模式表明,相比于看和风阁,看拙政园的人更放松。在条件B中观察到类似的结果,强化了拙政园的放松效果。然而,在条件B和条件a之间的放松效果有明显的差异,真实环境提供了更明显的好处。结论:本研究表明,无论是在真实环境还是虚拟现实环境中观看,文化丰富的拙政园都比和风阁更有效地改善情绪。这项研究表明,尽管VR可以提供身临其境的体验,但它可能无法完全捕捉到真实花园环境的感官丰富性和治疗效果。与VR设置相比,真实设置提供了更实质性的放松效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on the Effects of Viewing Real and Virtual Reality Classical Chinese Gardens.

Purpose: This study evaluates the relaxation effects of viewing a Chinese classical garden and a Chinese-style public park in reality and virtual reality (VR) environments by focusing on their psychological and physiological impacts. Background: The experiment examined two landscapes: the culturally rich and elaborately designed Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion. Methods: Twenty-eight participants participated in four sessions, each consisting of a 5-minute viewing session of the Humble Administrator's Garden and the Hefeng Pavilion under Conditions A (real) and B (VR). Each session was evaluated using the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire, the Semantic Differences Scale, the Supplemental Questionnaire, and eye tracking technology. Results: In Condition A, POMS scores, Semantic Differential Scale ratings, the Supplemental Questionnaire results, and eye movement patterns indicated that viewing the Humble Administrator's Garden resulted in greater relaxation compared to the Hefeng Pavilion. Similar findings were observed in Condition B, reinforcing the Humble Administrator's Garden's relaxing effect. However, there was a noticeable disparity in the relaxation effects between Conditions B and A, with real settings offering more pronounced benefits. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that the culturally rich Humble Administrator's Garden significantly improves mood more effectively than the Hefeng Pavilion, whether viewed in real or VR environments. This study suggests that although VR can offer an immersive experience, it may not fully capture the sensory richness and therapeutic benefits of actual garden environments. Real settings delivered more substantial relaxation effects compared to VR settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal
Herd-Health Environments Research & Design Journal PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
22.70%
发文量
82
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信