前交叉韧带初次重建和翻修后胫骨隧道的形态计量学分析。

IF 0.6 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
E Veizi, N Cay, B S Sezgin, A Sahin, A Firat, M Bozkurt
{"title":"前交叉韧带初次重建和翻修后胫骨隧道的形态计量学分析。","authors":"E Veizi, N Cay, B S Sezgin, A Sahin, A Firat, M Bozkurt","doi":"10.5704/MOJ.2503.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed surgical procedure. The objectives of this retrospective comparative study are (1) to evaluate the obliquity, size and the intra-articular aperture shape of the tibial tunnel in patients operated with an anteromedial portal technique, and (2) to determine their possible relation with revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients operated for a primary ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2018 were eligible. All patients of primary and revision ACL fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed for presence of a knee CT scan within one month of surgery and at least three years of follow-up. Several radiological parameters were measured for the study, among which: Tunnel height, Coronal tunnel angle, Maximal tunnel width and Sagittal tunnel inclination. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters correlated with revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the primary group was 30.5±8.4 versus 29.4±8.0 of the revision group. The majority of patients were males in both groups (n=33, 76.7% and n=38, 95.0%, respectively). A longer diameter of the intra-articular ellipse (p=0.005) and an increased mid-tunnel to TT distance on the axial plane (p=0.006) were significantly correlated with revision. A ROC curve analysis determined a cut-off value of 27.9mm from the tubercle was an optimal entry point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A greater distance between the mid-point of the tibial tunnel entrance and the centre of the tibial tubercle is linked to a higher risk of revision. An elongated elliptic shape in the antero-posterior plane also correlates with revision risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":45241,"journal":{"name":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"66-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Morphometric Analysis of the Tibial Tunnel after Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.\",\"authors\":\"E Veizi, N Cay, B S Sezgin, A Sahin, A Firat, M Bozkurt\",\"doi\":\"10.5704/MOJ.2503.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed surgical procedure. The objectives of this retrospective comparative study are (1) to evaluate the obliquity, size and the intra-articular aperture shape of the tibial tunnel in patients operated with an anteromedial portal technique, and (2) to determine their possible relation with revision surgery.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients operated for a primary ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2018 were eligible. All patients of primary and revision ACL fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed for presence of a knee CT scan within one month of surgery and at least three years of follow-up. Several radiological parameters were measured for the study, among which: Tunnel height, Coronal tunnel angle, Maximal tunnel width and Sagittal tunnel inclination. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters correlated with revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age of the primary group was 30.5±8.4 versus 29.4±8.0 of the revision group. The majority of patients were males in both groups (n=33, 76.7% and n=38, 95.0%, respectively). A longer diameter of the intra-articular ellipse (p=0.005) and an increased mid-tunnel to TT distance on the axial plane (p=0.006) were significantly correlated with revision. A ROC curve analysis determined a cut-off value of 27.9mm from the tubercle was an optimal entry point.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A greater distance between the mid-point of the tibial tunnel entrance and the centre of the tibial tubercle is linked to a higher risk of revision. An elongated elliptic shape in the antero-posterior plane also correlates with revision risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"66-76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12022709/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2503.009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.2503.009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

前交叉韧带(ACL)重建是一种常用的外科手术。本回顾性比较研究的目的是:(1)评估采用内侧前门静脉技术手术患者胫骨隧道的倾斜度、大小和关节内孔形状,以及(2)确定它们与翻修手术的可能关系。材料和方法:2014年至2018年间接受初级ACL重建手术的患者符合条件。所有符合纳入标准的原发性和改进型前交叉韧带患者在手术后1个月内和至少3年随访期间进行膝关节CT扫描。测量了隧道高度、隧道冠状面角、隧道最大宽度和隧道矢状面倾角等放射学参数。进行多变量分析以确定与修订相关的参数。结果:原发组的平均年龄为30.5±8.4岁,改良组为29.4±8.0岁。两组患者均以男性为主(n=33、76.7%和n=38、95.0%)。更长的关节内椭圆直径(p=0.005)和在轴向平面上隧道中部到TT的距离增加(p=0.006)与翻修显著相关。ROC曲线分析确定距离结节27.9mm的临界值为最佳切入点。结论:胫骨隧道入口中点与胫骨结节中心之间的距离越大,翻修的风险就越大。前后平面呈椭圆形也与翻修风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Morphometric Analysis of the Tibial Tunnel after Primary and Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Introduction: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed surgical procedure. The objectives of this retrospective comparative study are (1) to evaluate the obliquity, size and the intra-articular aperture shape of the tibial tunnel in patients operated with an anteromedial portal technique, and (2) to determine their possible relation with revision surgery.

Material and methods: Patients operated for a primary ACL reconstruction between 2014 and 2018 were eligible. All patients of primary and revision ACL fulfilling the inclusion criteria were assessed for presence of a knee CT scan within one month of surgery and at least three years of follow-up. Several radiological parameters were measured for the study, among which: Tunnel height, Coronal tunnel angle, Maximal tunnel width and Sagittal tunnel inclination. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify parameters correlated with revision.

Results: Mean age of the primary group was 30.5±8.4 versus 29.4±8.0 of the revision group. The majority of patients were males in both groups (n=33, 76.7% and n=38, 95.0%, respectively). A longer diameter of the intra-articular ellipse (p=0.005) and an increased mid-tunnel to TT distance on the axial plane (p=0.006) were significantly correlated with revision. A ROC curve analysis determined a cut-off value of 27.9mm from the tubercle was an optimal entry point.

Conclusion: A greater distance between the mid-point of the tibial tunnel entrance and the centre of the tibial tubercle is linked to a higher risk of revision. An elongated elliptic shape in the antero-posterior plane also correlates with revision risk.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes original papers and case reports three times a year in both printed and electronic version. The purpose of MOJ is to disseminate new knowledge and provide updates in Orthopaedics, trauma and musculoskeletal research. It is an Open Access journal that does not require processing fee or article processing charge from the authors. The Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal is the official journal of Malaysian Orthopaedic Association (MOA) and ASEAN Orthopaedic Association (AOA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信