加压腹腔内气雾化疗(PIPAC):澳大利亚首例经验。

IF 1.4 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Pleura and Peritoneum Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1515/pp-2024-0028
Katarina Foley, Jessica Reid, Suzanne Edwards, Timothy Price, Allan Zimet, Susan Woods, Markus Trochsler, Andrew Craig Lynch, Peter Hewett
{"title":"加压腹腔内气雾化疗(PIPAC):澳大利亚首例经验。","authors":"Katarina Foley, Jessica Reid, Suzanne Edwards, Timothy Price, Allan Zimet, Susan Woods, Markus Trochsler, Andrew Craig Lynch, Peter Hewett","doi":"10.1515/pp-2024-0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel surgical technique for patients with peritoneal metastases not amenable to curative treatment. PIPAC delivers pressurised aerosolised chemotherapy using a hyperbaric capnoperitonem established laparoscopically. This study sought to investigate the feasibility and safety of PIPAC in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a cohort analysis of prospectively-collected data on patients undergoing PIPAC across two Australian hospitals. Participants were planned to have three PIPAC procedures, each 6 weeks apart. Study outcomes included post-operative complications including 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and patient quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 patients underwent 50 completed procedures. 13 patients had two or more PIPACs. The most common primary malignancy was colorectal cancer (n=8), followed by gastric cancer (n=4), appendiceal cancer (n=4) and mesothelioma (n=2). One grade four but no grade five complications occurred, with zero 30-day mortality. Median LOS was 1 day. Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score increased from 47.8 at baseline to 53 post second PIPAC. Due to the heterogeneity of our cohort, survival analysis and statistical comparisons were unable to be made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated in an Australian population with a lack of severe complications and zero 30 day mortality. Due to the small number of patients and the heterogeneity of our study's sample, it was not possible to perform survival analysis. The study is nonetheless valuable as the first investigation of implementation of PIPAC in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"10 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): the first Australian experience.\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Foley, Jessica Reid, Suzanne Edwards, Timothy Price, Allan Zimet, Susan Woods, Markus Trochsler, Andrew Craig Lynch, Peter Hewett\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2024-0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel surgical technique for patients with peritoneal metastases not amenable to curative treatment. PIPAC delivers pressurised aerosolised chemotherapy using a hyperbaric capnoperitonem established laparoscopically. This study sought to investigate the feasibility and safety of PIPAC in an Australian population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We undertook a cohort analysis of prospectively-collected data on patients undergoing PIPAC across two Australian hospitals. Participants were planned to have three PIPAC procedures, each 6 weeks apart. Study outcomes included post-operative complications including 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and patient quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 scores).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>18 patients underwent 50 completed procedures. 13 patients had two or more PIPACs. The most common primary malignancy was colorectal cancer (n=8), followed by gastric cancer (n=4), appendiceal cancer (n=4) and mesothelioma (n=2). One grade four but no grade five complications occurred, with zero 30-day mortality. Median LOS was 1 day. Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score increased from 47.8 at baseline to 53 post second PIPAC. Due to the heterogeneity of our cohort, survival analysis and statistical comparisons were unable to be made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated in an Australian population with a lack of severe complications and zero 30 day mortality. Due to the small number of patients and the heterogeneity of our study's sample, it was not possible to perform survival analysis. The study is nonetheless valuable as the first investigation of implementation of PIPAC in Australia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"25-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016020/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:加压腹腔喷雾化疗(PIPAC)是一种新的手术技术,用于治疗腹膜转移性肿瘤。PIPAC使用腹腔镜下建立的高压氧囊腔提供加压雾化化疗。本研究旨在调查PIPAC在澳大利亚人群中的可行性和安全性。方法:我们对澳大利亚两家医院接受PIPAC的患者的前瞻性数据进行了队列分析。参与者计划进行三次PIPAC程序,每次间隔6周。研究结果包括术后并发症,包括30天死亡率、住院时间(LOS)和患者生活质量(EORTC QLQ-C30评分)。结果:18例患者完成了50例手术。13例患者有2个或2个以上pipac。最常见的原发恶性肿瘤是结直肠癌(n=8),其次是胃癌(n=4)、阑尾癌(n=4)和间皮瘤(n=2)。1例4级并发症,无5级并发症发生,30天死亡率为零。平均生存期为1天。平均EORTC QLQ-C30评分从基线时的47.8 增加到第二次PIPAC后的53。由于我们队列的异质性,无法进行生存分析和统计比较。结论:PIPAC在澳大利亚人群中可行、安全且耐受性良好,无严重并发症,30天死亡率为零。由于患者数量少,且本研究样本具有异质性,因此无法进行生存分析。尽管如此,这项研究还是有价值的,因为它是对澳大利亚PIPAC实施情况的首次调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC): the first Australian experience.

Objectives: Pressurised intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a novel surgical technique for patients with peritoneal metastases not amenable to curative treatment. PIPAC delivers pressurised aerosolised chemotherapy using a hyperbaric capnoperitonem established laparoscopically. This study sought to investigate the feasibility and safety of PIPAC in an Australian population.

Methods: We undertook a cohort analysis of prospectively-collected data on patients undergoing PIPAC across two Australian hospitals. Participants were planned to have three PIPAC procedures, each 6 weeks apart. Study outcomes included post-operative complications including 30-day mortality, length of stay (LOS) and patient quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30 scores).

Results: 18 patients underwent 50 completed procedures. 13 patients had two or more PIPACs. The most common primary malignancy was colorectal cancer (n=8), followed by gastric cancer (n=4), appendiceal cancer (n=4) and mesothelioma (n=2). One grade four but no grade five complications occurred, with zero 30-day mortality. Median LOS was 1 day. Mean EORTC QLQ-C30 score increased from 47.8 at baseline to 53 post second PIPAC. Due to the heterogeneity of our cohort, survival analysis and statistical comparisons were unable to be made.

Conclusion: PIPAC is feasible, safe and well tolerated in an Australian population with a lack of severe complications and zero 30 day mortality. Due to the small number of patients and the heterogeneity of our study's sample, it was not possible to perform survival analysis. The study is nonetheless valuable as the first investigation of implementation of PIPAC in Australia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
23
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信