Aécio Rubens Dias Pereira Filho, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Vinicius Santos Baptista, Vinicius de Meldau Benites, Milton Kiyonory Uehara, Nuno Rodolfo Colaço Aguiar, Arthur Cristiano Baston, Alexandre Vinhal Desideri, Francisco Cialdine Frota Carneiro Júnior
{"title":"腰椎前路椎体间融合术在腰椎复杂翻修手术中的安全性和可行性：来自135例经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术/后路腰椎椎体间融合器取出的病例系列的见解。","authors":"Aécio Rubens Dias Pereira Filho, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Vinicius Santos Baptista, Vinicius de Meldau Benites, Milton Kiyonory Uehara, Nuno Rodolfo Colaço Aguiar, Arthur Cristiano Baston, Alexandre Vinhal Desideri, Francisco Cialdine Frota Carneiro Júnior","doi":"10.14444/8753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has emerged as a valuable technique for managing lumbar degenerative conditions and revision surgeries, particularly for addressing complications associated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages. However, there is limited evidence documenting its safety and feasibility in the context of revision procedures involving cage removal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate intraoperative outcomes of ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal, focusing on complications, surgical times, and blood loss in a substantial case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series analyzed data from 135 patients who underwent ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal between January 2019 and May 2023. Surgical indications included pseudarthrosis, cage migration, and infection. Outcomes assessed included intraoperative complications, surgical duration, and estimated blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 135 patients (median age: 47 years, range: 15-78), vascular injuries occurred in only 4 cases, all involving the left iliac vein, and were managed intraoperatively without sequelae. No injuries to retroperitoneal, neural, or organ structures were observed. Median surgical time was 100 minutes (range: 50-210), with most cases resulting in less than 150 mL of blood loss. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of ALIF for managing TLIF/PLIF complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALIF is a safe and effective option for revision surgeries involving TLIF/PLIF cage removal, offering a low complication profile and manageable intraoperative challenges. A critical factor contributing to these favorable outcomes is the multidisciplinary approach, where the collaboration between access and spine surgeons ensures meticulous handling of anatomical and vascular challenges.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides valuable data for further prospective research to explore long-term outcomes and refine surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal.\",\"authors\":\"Aécio Rubens Dias Pereira Filho, Matheus Galvão Valadares Bertolini Mussalem, Vinicius Santos Baptista, Vinicius de Meldau Benites, Milton Kiyonory Uehara, Nuno Rodolfo Colaço Aguiar, Arthur Cristiano Baston, Alexandre Vinhal Desideri, Francisco Cialdine Frota Carneiro Júnior\",\"doi\":\"10.14444/8753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has emerged as a valuable technique for managing lumbar degenerative conditions and revision surgeries, particularly for addressing complications associated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages. However, there is limited evidence documenting its safety and feasibility in the context of revision procedures involving cage removal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate intraoperative outcomes of ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal, focusing on complications, surgical times, and blood loss in a substantial case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case series analyzed data from 135 patients who underwent ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal between January 2019 and May 2023. Surgical indications included pseudarthrosis, cage migration, and infection. Outcomes assessed included intraoperative complications, surgical duration, and estimated blood loss.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 135 patients (median age: 47 years, range: 15-78), vascular injuries occurred in only 4 cases, all involving the left iliac vein, and were managed intraoperatively without sequelae. No injuries to retroperitoneal, neural, or organ structures were observed. Median surgical time was 100 minutes (range: 50-210), with most cases resulting in less than 150 mL of blood loss. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of ALIF for managing TLIF/PLIF complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ALIF is a safe and effective option for revision surgeries involving TLIF/PLIF cage removal, offering a low complication profile and manageable intraoperative challenges. A critical factor contributing to these favorable outcomes is the multidisciplinary approach, where the collaboration between access and spine surgeons ensures meticulous handling of anatomical and vascular challenges.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>This study provides valuable data for further prospective research to explore long-term outcomes and refine surgical techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14444/8753\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8753","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Safety and Viability of Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Complex Revision Lumbar Spine Surgeries: Insights From a Case Series of 135 Patients on Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion/Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Cage Removal.
Background: Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has emerged as a valuable technique for managing lumbar degenerative conditions and revision surgeries, particularly for addressing complications associated with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) cages. However, there is limited evidence documenting its safety and feasibility in the context of revision procedures involving cage removal.
Objective: To evaluate intraoperative outcomes of ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal, focusing on complications, surgical times, and blood loss in a substantial case series.
Methods: This case series analyzed data from 135 patients who underwent ALIF for TLIF/PLIF cage removal between January 2019 and May 2023. Surgical indications included pseudarthrosis, cage migration, and infection. Outcomes assessed included intraoperative complications, surgical duration, and estimated blood loss.
Results: Of the 135 patients (median age: 47 years, range: 15-78), vascular injuries occurred in only 4 cases, all involving the left iliac vein, and were managed intraoperatively without sequelae. No injuries to retroperitoneal, neural, or organ structures were observed. Median surgical time was 100 minutes (range: 50-210), with most cases resulting in less than 150 mL of blood loss. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of ALIF for managing TLIF/PLIF complications.
Conclusion: ALIF is a safe and effective option for revision surgeries involving TLIF/PLIF cage removal, offering a low complication profile and manageable intraoperative challenges. A critical factor contributing to these favorable outcomes is the multidisciplinary approach, where the collaboration between access and spine surgeons ensures meticulous handling of anatomical and vascular challenges.
Clinical relevance: This study provides valuable data for further prospective research to explore long-term outcomes and refine surgical techniques.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
