门诊患者移动入院流程和行政周转时间:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Ho Sub Chung, Myeong Namgung, Sung Jin Bae, Yunhyung Choi, Dong Hoon Lee, Chan Woong Kim, Sunho Kim, Kwang Yul Jung
{"title":"门诊患者移动入院流程和行政周转时间:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Ho Sub Chung, Myeong Namgung, Sung Jin Bae, Yunhyung Choi, Dong Hoon Lee, Chan Woong Kim, Sunho Kim, Kwang Yul Jung","doi":"10.1055/a-2576-7110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the time efficiency of the hospital admission process using personal mobile devices to traditional walk-in methods, thereby assessing the effectiveness of the mobile admission process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital in South Korea (August 2022-January 2023). Turnaround times for the walk-in and mobile admission processes were compared. Patients were divided into mobile and walk-in groups based on their admission process. Collected timestamp data were extracted by examining patients' electronic medical record log time or caregivers' electronic signatures on consent forms. Time intervals between timestamp data were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 4,344 patients to compare the turnaround time and demographics of the mobile (n = 1,336) and walk-in (n = 3,008) admission processes. The former had a significantly shorter mean turnaround time (13.4 min) than the latter (22.2 min). Female patients, younger patients, and those admitted to surgery departments were more likely to use the mobile process. Older patients were less likely to undergo mobile admissions. A linear regression analysis revealed that these factors significantly affected the usability of the mobile device admission process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the traditional walk-in admission process, the mobile admission process can reduce task completion time.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mobile Admission Process and Administrative Turnaround Time for Hospitalization of Outpatients: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Ho Sub Chung, Myeong Namgung, Sung Jin Bae, Yunhyung Choi, Dong Hoon Lee, Chan Woong Kim, Sunho Kim, Kwang Yul Jung\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2576-7110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study compared the time efficiency of the hospital admission process using personal mobile devices to traditional walk-in methods, thereby assessing the effectiveness of the mobile admission process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted at Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital in South Korea (August 2022-January 2023). Turnaround times for the walk-in and mobile admission processes were compared. Patients were divided into mobile and walk-in groups based on their admission process. Collected timestamp data were extracted by examining patients' electronic medical record log time or caregivers' electronic signatures on consent forms. Time intervals between timestamp data were calculated and compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 4,344 patients to compare the turnaround time and demographics of the mobile (n = 1,336) and walk-in (n = 3,008) admission processes. The former had a significantly shorter mean turnaround time (13.4 min) than the latter (22.2 min). Female patients, younger patients, and those admitted to surgery departments were more likely to use the mobile process. Older patients were less likely to undergo mobile admissions. A linear regression analysis revealed that these factors significantly affected the usability of the mobile device admission process.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared to the traditional walk-in admission process, the mobile admission process can reduce task completion time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-7110\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2576-7110","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了使用个人移动设备的医院入院流程与传统的走进方式的时间效率,从而评估移动入院流程的有效性。方法:本回顾性研究于韩国中央大学光明医院(2022年8月- 2023年1月)进行。比较了上门和移动入院流程的周转时间。患者根据入院过程分为流动组和预约组。收集的时间戳数据通过检查患者的电子病历日志时间或护理人员在同意书上的电子签名来提取。计算和比较时间戳数据之间的时间间隔。结果:我们纳入了4344名患者,比较了移动(n = 1336)和预约(n = 3008)入院流程的周转时间和人口统计学特征。前者的平均周转时间(13.4分钟)明显短于后者(22.2分钟)。女性患者、年轻患者和外科住院患者更有可能使用移动过程。老年患者不太可能接受移动入院。线性回归分析显示,这些因素显著影响移动设备准入过程的可用性。结论:与传统的步入式就诊流程相比,移动就诊流程可缩短任务完成时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mobile Admission Process and Administrative Turnaround Time for Hospitalization of Outpatients: A Retrospective Study.

Objectives: This study compared the time efficiency of the hospital admission process using personal mobile devices to traditional walk-in methods, thereby assessing the effectiveness of the mobile admission process.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at Chung-Ang University Gwangmyeong Hospital in South Korea (August 2022-January 2023). Turnaround times for the walk-in and mobile admission processes were compared. Patients were divided into mobile and walk-in groups based on their admission process. Collected timestamp data were extracted by examining patients' electronic medical record log time or caregivers' electronic signatures on consent forms. Time intervals between timestamp data were calculated and compared.

Results: We enrolled 4,344 patients to compare the turnaround time and demographics of the mobile (n = 1,336) and walk-in (n = 3,008) admission processes. The former had a significantly shorter mean turnaround time (13.4 min) than the latter (22.2 min). Female patients, younger patients, and those admitted to surgery departments were more likely to use the mobile process. Older patients were less likely to undergo mobile admissions. A linear regression analysis revealed that these factors significantly affected the usability of the mobile device admission process.

Conclusions: Compared to the traditional walk-in admission process, the mobile admission process can reduce task completion time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信