左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器:持续盆腔疼痛症状的有效治疗。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Renee M Cocks, Samantha S Mooney, Sonia R Grover
{"title":"左炔诺孕酮释放宫内节育器:持续盆腔疼痛症状的有效治疗。","authors":"Renee M Cocks, Samantha S Mooney, Sonia R Grover","doi":"10.1111/ajo.70042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent pelvic pain (PPP) affects 5%-27% of women of reproductive age. The calls for earlier and improved access to surgery to diagnose endometriosis do not address the requirement for symptom management and exclude the 50% of women who undergo a laparoscopy for identical pain symptoms but do not have endometriosis identified. Moreover, current evidence for the management of pelvic pain almost exclusively focuses on patients diagnosed with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the pain scores and overall satisfaction with symptom control in participants with PPP who utilised the levonorgestrel-intrauterine device 52 mg (LNG-IUD), to explore the association between time since last menstrual period (LMP) and other potential factors, including the impact of surgery and surgical findings, on pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study recruited participants between February 2015 and December 2017 following outpatient clinic referral for pelvic pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic pelvic pain, dysuria, dyspareunia or dyschezia). Over 18 months, 72 participants had an LNG-IUD (52 mg) inserted, with 51 completing a follow-up questionnaire 6-18 months after insertion to assess pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysmenorrhoea (coefficient = -0.142, p < 0.001) and overall satisfaction with symptom control (coefficient = 0.079, p = 0.020) scores improved linearly with increased months since LMP in LNG-IUD users. In multivariate analysis, the age of onset of symptoms, laparoscopies prior to study entry or during the study period, and a histological diagnosis of endometriosis did not have a significant relationship with pain outcome or overall satisfaction with symptom control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that menstrual suppression with the LNG-IUD, regardless of a diagnosis of endometriosis, significantly improves a woman's overall satisfaction with PPP management. The LNG-IUD is an effective first-line medical management option for patients presenting with PPP.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device: An Effective Treatment for Symptoms of Persistent Pelvic Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Renee M Cocks, Samantha S Mooney, Sonia R Grover\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ajo.70042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Persistent pelvic pain (PPP) affects 5%-27% of women of reproductive age. The calls for earlier and improved access to surgery to diagnose endometriosis do not address the requirement for symptom management and exclude the 50% of women who undergo a laparoscopy for identical pain symptoms but do not have endometriosis identified. Moreover, current evidence for the management of pelvic pain almost exclusively focuses on patients diagnosed with endometriosis.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate the pain scores and overall satisfaction with symptom control in participants with PPP who utilised the levonorgestrel-intrauterine device 52 mg (LNG-IUD), to explore the association between time since last menstrual period (LMP) and other potential factors, including the impact of surgery and surgical findings, on pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective cohort study recruited participants between February 2015 and December 2017 following outpatient clinic referral for pelvic pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic pelvic pain, dysuria, dyspareunia or dyschezia). Over 18 months, 72 participants had an LNG-IUD (52 mg) inserted, with 51 completing a follow-up questionnaire 6-18 months after insertion to assess pain outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dysmenorrhoea (coefficient = -0.142, p < 0.001) and overall satisfaction with symptom control (coefficient = 0.079, p = 0.020) scores improved linearly with increased months since LMP in LNG-IUD users. In multivariate analysis, the age of onset of symptoms, laparoscopies prior to study entry or during the study period, and a histological diagnosis of endometriosis did not have a significant relationship with pain outcome or overall satisfaction with symptom control.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study demonstrates that menstrual suppression with the LNG-IUD, regardless of a diagnosis of endometriosis, significantly improves a woman's overall satisfaction with PPP management. The LNG-IUD is an effective first-line medical management option for patients presenting with PPP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55429,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70042\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.70042","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续骨盆疼痛(PPP)影响5%-27%的育龄妇女。呼吁更早和更好地获得手术诊断子宫内膜异位症的机会,并没有解决症状管理的要求,也排除了50%接受腹腔镜检查的妇女,她们有相同的疼痛症状,但没有确定子宫内膜异位症。此外,目前治疗盆腔疼痛的证据几乎完全集中在诊断为子宫内膜异位症的患者身上。目的:探讨使用左炔诺孕酮-宫内节育器52 mg (LNG-IUD)的PPP患者的疼痛评分和症状控制总体满意度,探讨末次月经时间(LMP)与其他潜在因素(包括手术和手术结果的影响)对疼痛结局的影响。材料和方法:该前瞻性队列研究在2015年2月至2017年12月期间招募了盆腔疼痛症状(痛经、非周期性盆腔疼痛、排尿困难、性交困难或精神障碍)门诊转诊的参与者。在18个月的时间里,72名参与者植入了LNG-IUD (52 mg), 51名参与者在植入后6-18个月完成了随访问卷,以评估疼痛结果。结论:本研究表明,无论是否诊断为子宫内膜异位症,使用LNG-IUD抑制月经均可显著提高女性对PPP管理的总体满意度。LNG-IUD是PPP患者有效的一线医疗管理选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine Device: An Effective Treatment for Symptoms of Persistent Pelvic Pain.

Background: Persistent pelvic pain (PPP) affects 5%-27% of women of reproductive age. The calls for earlier and improved access to surgery to diagnose endometriosis do not address the requirement for symptom management and exclude the 50% of women who undergo a laparoscopy for identical pain symptoms but do not have endometriosis identified. Moreover, current evidence for the management of pelvic pain almost exclusively focuses on patients diagnosed with endometriosis.

Aims: To investigate the pain scores and overall satisfaction with symptom control in participants with PPP who utilised the levonorgestrel-intrauterine device 52 mg (LNG-IUD), to explore the association between time since last menstrual period (LMP) and other potential factors, including the impact of surgery and surgical findings, on pain outcomes.

Materials and methods: This prospective cohort study recruited participants between February 2015 and December 2017 following outpatient clinic referral for pelvic pain symptoms (dysmenorrhea, non-cyclic pelvic pain, dysuria, dyspareunia or dyschezia). Over 18 months, 72 participants had an LNG-IUD (52 mg) inserted, with 51 completing a follow-up questionnaire 6-18 months after insertion to assess pain outcomes.

Results: Dysmenorrhoea (coefficient = -0.142, p < 0.001) and overall satisfaction with symptom control (coefficient = 0.079, p = 0.020) scores improved linearly with increased months since LMP in LNG-IUD users. In multivariate analysis, the age of onset of symptoms, laparoscopies prior to study entry or during the study period, and a histological diagnosis of endometriosis did not have a significant relationship with pain outcome or overall satisfaction with symptom control.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that menstrual suppression with the LNG-IUD, regardless of a diagnosis of endometriosis, significantly improves a woman's overall satisfaction with PPP management. The LNG-IUD is an effective first-line medical management option for patients presenting with PPP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信