真空灌胃术治疗枪炮性腹膜炎。

Q4 Medicine
A A Sazonov, P N Romashchenko, I A Makarov, R K Aliev, A A Erokhina, N A Maistrenko
{"title":"真空灌胃术治疗枪炮性腹膜炎。","authors":"A A Sazonov, P N Romashchenko, I A Makarov, R K Aliev, A A Erokhina, N A Maistrenko","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202505113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective. t: </strong>O evaluate efficacy of vacuum instillation laparostomy in the treatment of victims with gunshot peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed treatment outcomes in 103 victims with gunshot abdominal wounds complicated by peritonitis. All patients underwent multi-stage surgical treatment with vacuum-instillation laparostomy (VIL) in the main group (<i>n</i>=37) and vacuum-assisted laparostomy (VAL) in the control group (<i>n</i>=66). Negative pressure was 90 mm Hg due to high risk of bleeding following traumatic disease. The interval between debridement did not exceed 48 hours. VIL was carried out in the following format: duration of vacuum phase 3 hours 30 minutes, volume of injected solution 300 ml, exposure time 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complications occurred in 32.4% and 43.9% of patients, respectively (<i>p</i>>0.05). There was a tendency towards significant differences (<i>p</i>=0.07) in the incidence of complications Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV (13.5% and 30.3%). In-hospital mortality was 3% and 6%, respectively (<i>p</i>>0.05). Bacteriological analysis revealed faster achievement of target indicators of microflora elimination in VIL (the 7<sup>th</sup> day) compared to VAL (the 11<sup>th</sup> day). Adhesive process following VIL was significantly less severe. Indeed, there was Björck stage 1B and 2B of abdominal cavity by the 4<sup>th</sup> debridement in majority of patients in both groups, respectively. These changes correlated with histological findings. VIL was accompanied by faster regression of leukocyte infiltration and less severe fibrous changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VIL provides more effective abdominal decontamination and less severe adhesive process compared to VAL. This reduces the number of debridement procedures and risk of complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 5","pages":"13-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Vacuum-instillation laparostomy for gunshot peritonitis].\",\"authors\":\"A A Sazonov, P N Romashchenko, I A Makarov, R K Aliev, A A Erokhina, N A Maistrenko\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia202505113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective. t: </strong>O evaluate efficacy of vacuum instillation laparostomy in the treatment of victims with gunshot peritonitis.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We analyzed treatment outcomes in 103 victims with gunshot abdominal wounds complicated by peritonitis. All patients underwent multi-stage surgical treatment with vacuum-instillation laparostomy (VIL) in the main group (<i>n</i>=37) and vacuum-assisted laparostomy (VAL) in the control group (<i>n</i>=66). Negative pressure was 90 mm Hg due to high risk of bleeding following traumatic disease. The interval between debridement did not exceed 48 hours. VIL was carried out in the following format: duration of vacuum phase 3 hours 30 minutes, volume of injected solution 300 ml, exposure time 30 minutes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Complications occurred in 32.4% and 43.9% of patients, respectively (<i>p</i>>0.05). There was a tendency towards significant differences (<i>p</i>=0.07) in the incidence of complications Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV (13.5% and 30.3%). In-hospital mortality was 3% and 6%, respectively (<i>p</i>>0.05). Bacteriological analysis revealed faster achievement of target indicators of microflora elimination in VIL (the 7<sup>th</sup> day) compared to VAL (the 11<sup>th</sup> day). Adhesive process following VIL was significantly less severe. Indeed, there was Björck stage 1B and 2B of abdominal cavity by the 4<sup>th</sup> debridement in majority of patients in both groups, respectively. These changes correlated with histological findings. VIL was accompanied by faster regression of leukocyte infiltration and less severe fibrous changes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VIL provides more effective abdominal decontamination and less severe adhesive process compared to VAL. This reduces the number of debridement procedures and risk of complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":\" 5\",\"pages\":\"13-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202505113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202505113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标。目的:探讨真空灌胃术治疗枪弹性腹膜炎的疗效。材料和方法:我们分析了103例腹部枪伤合并腹膜炎患者的治疗结果。所有患者均采用分阶段手术治疗,主组(n=37)采用真空灌注开腹术(VIL),对照组(n=66)采用真空辅助开腹术(VAL)。由于外伤性疾病后出血的高风险,负压为90 mm Hg。清创间隔不超过48小时。VIL按以下格式进行:真空相时间3小时30分钟,进样液量300 ml,暴露时间30分钟。结果:并发症发生率分别为32.4%和43.9% (p < 0.05)。Clavien-Dindo III-IV级并发症发生率分别为13.5%和30.3%,差异有统计学意义(p=0.07)。住院死亡率分别为3%和6% (p < 0.05)。细菌学分析显示,VIL(第7天)比VAL(第11天)更快地达到微生物区系消除的目标指标。VIL后的粘接过程明显较轻。的确,两组绝大多数患者在第4次清创术时腹腔分别达到Björck 1B期和2B期。这些变化与组织学结果相关。VIL伴白细胞浸润消退较快,纤维改变较轻。结论:与VAL相比,VIL提供了更有效的腹部去污和更轻的粘连过程,这减少了清创手术的次数和并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Vacuum-instillation laparostomy for gunshot peritonitis].

Objective. t: O evaluate efficacy of vacuum instillation laparostomy in the treatment of victims with gunshot peritonitis.

Material and methods: We analyzed treatment outcomes in 103 victims with gunshot abdominal wounds complicated by peritonitis. All patients underwent multi-stage surgical treatment with vacuum-instillation laparostomy (VIL) in the main group (n=37) and vacuum-assisted laparostomy (VAL) in the control group (n=66). Negative pressure was 90 mm Hg due to high risk of bleeding following traumatic disease. The interval between debridement did not exceed 48 hours. VIL was carried out in the following format: duration of vacuum phase 3 hours 30 minutes, volume of injected solution 300 ml, exposure time 30 minutes.

Results: Complications occurred in 32.4% and 43.9% of patients, respectively (p>0.05). There was a tendency towards significant differences (p=0.07) in the incidence of complications Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV (13.5% and 30.3%). In-hospital mortality was 3% and 6%, respectively (p>0.05). Bacteriological analysis revealed faster achievement of target indicators of microflora elimination in VIL (the 7th day) compared to VAL (the 11th day). Adhesive process following VIL was significantly less severe. Indeed, there was Björck stage 1B and 2B of abdominal cavity by the 4th debridement in majority of patients in both groups, respectively. These changes correlated with histological findings. VIL was accompanied by faster regression of leukocyte infiltration and less severe fibrous changes.

Conclusion: VIL provides more effective abdominal decontamination and less severe adhesive process compared to VAL. This reduces the number of debridement procedures and risk of complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Khirurgiya
Khirurgiya Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: Хирургия отдельных областей сердце, сосуды легкие пищевод молочная железа желудок и двенадцатиперстная кишка кишечник желчевыводящие пути печень
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信