外伤性失血性休克的院前血液管理。

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Bryan McNeilly, Kathleen Samsey, Seth Kelly, Andre Pennardt, Francis X Guyette
{"title":"外伤性失血性休克的院前血液管理。","authors":"Bryan McNeilly, Kathleen Samsey, Seth Kelly, Andre Pennardt, Francis X Guyette","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the military's advancement of prehospital blood into the field, civilian prehospital blood programs are becoming more prevalent. However, there are significant differences between civilian and military prehospital operations that should be considered. Civilian prehospital systems also vary widely in terms of resources, transport times, and patient types. Given these variations and the logistical challenges associated with establishing a prehospital blood program, careful consideration of the state of the science is warranted. Although blood is the preferred fluid for patients in hemorrhagic shock, there have only been a few high-quality studies that have examined the efficacy of administering blood in the prehospital setting. Given the conflicting results of these studies, individual medical directors must determine whether the risk-benefit analysis for their system warrants establishing such a resource-intensive operation. Efforts to establish a prehospital blood program should not supersede attempts to optimize the fundamental components of trauma operations and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 2","pages":"100041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prehospital Blood Administration in Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.\",\"authors\":\"Bryan McNeilly, Kathleen Samsey, Seth Kelly, Andre Pennardt, Francis X Guyette\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following the military's advancement of prehospital blood into the field, civilian prehospital blood programs are becoming more prevalent. However, there are significant differences between civilian and military prehospital operations that should be considered. Civilian prehospital systems also vary widely in terms of resources, transport times, and patient types. Given these variations and the logistical challenges associated with establishing a prehospital blood program, careful consideration of the state of the science is warranted. Although blood is the preferred fluid for patients in hemorrhagic shock, there have only been a few high-quality studies that have examined the efficacy of administering blood in the prehospital setting. Given the conflicting results of these studies, individual medical directors must determine whether the risk-benefit analysis for their system warrants establishing such a resource-intensive operation. Efforts to establish a prehospital blood program should not supersede attempts to optimize the fundamental components of trauma operations and management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"100041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100041\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着军队院前采血进入战场,民用院前采血项目也变得越来越普遍。然而,应考虑民用和军用院前手术之间的重大差异。民用院前系统在资源、运输时间和患者类型方面也存在很大差异。考虑到这些变化和与建立院前血液计划相关的后勤挑战,仔细考虑科学状况是有必要的。虽然血液是失血性休克患者首选的液体,但只有少数高质量的研究检验了院前输血的有效性。鉴于这些研究的结果相互矛盾,个别医疗主任必须确定其系统的风险-收益分析是否值得建立这样的资源密集型操作。努力建立院前血液计划不应取代尝试优化创伤手术和管理的基本组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prehospital Blood Administration in Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock.

Following the military's advancement of prehospital blood into the field, civilian prehospital blood programs are becoming more prevalent. However, there are significant differences between civilian and military prehospital operations that should be considered. Civilian prehospital systems also vary widely in terms of resources, transport times, and patient types. Given these variations and the logistical challenges associated with establishing a prehospital blood program, careful consideration of the state of the science is warranted. Although blood is the preferred fluid for patients in hemorrhagic shock, there have only been a few high-quality studies that have examined the efficacy of administering blood in the prehospital setting. Given the conflicting results of these studies, individual medical directors must determine whether the risk-benefit analysis for their system warrants establishing such a resource-intensive operation. Efforts to establish a prehospital blood program should not supersede attempts to optimize the fundamental components of trauma operations and management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信