分诊表中的儿科呼吸评分。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Joanne N Brunson, Carolyn Greely, Suzanna Fitzpatrick
{"title":"分诊表中的儿科呼吸评分。","authors":"Joanne N Brunson, Carolyn Greely, Suzanna Fitzpatrick","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Respiratory distress is a common pediatric presentation in emergency departments requiring prompt treatment to avoid poor outcomes. A retrospective chart review at a large community hospital pediatric emergency department revealed that 22% of walk-in patients 0 to 12 years old, who were transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit for a respiratory-related complaint, were undertriaged with an emergency severity index score of 3 or 4. The transferred patients from the hospital's pediatric emergency department with emergency severity index scores of 3 or 4 had an average wait of 1 hour and 15 minutes to see a provider compared with those with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2 who had an average wait of 43 minutes. Implementation of a pediatric respiratory score in emergency department triage formed the basis of a 15-week quality improvement initiative. The aim was to reduce wait times for pediatric patients requiring pediatric intensive care unit care owing to respiratory distress and to decrease door-to-provider and door-to-transfer times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Staff were trained over 1 week on respiratory score use. Weekly data were collected on nurse respiratory score utilization for all pediatric respiratory patients, percentage of respiratory patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with the correct emergency severity index level of 1 or 2, and average door-to-provider and door-to-transport times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were transferred for respiratory distress; 86.5% of these were correctly triaged with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2, which was an improvement from 78% the previous year. Average door-to-provider time was 15 minutes for transferred patients with a respiratory score and 20 minutes for those without. Average door-to-transport time was less than 10 hours for both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The pediatric respiratory score can improve patient assessment at the point of triage. Since implementing the pediatric respiratory score, wait times have improved for patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with a respiratory complaint.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pediatric Respiratory Score in the Triage Form.\",\"authors\":\"Joanne N Brunson, Carolyn Greely, Suzanna Fitzpatrick\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Respiratory distress is a common pediatric presentation in emergency departments requiring prompt treatment to avoid poor outcomes. A retrospective chart review at a large community hospital pediatric emergency department revealed that 22% of walk-in patients 0 to 12 years old, who were transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit for a respiratory-related complaint, were undertriaged with an emergency severity index score of 3 or 4. The transferred patients from the hospital's pediatric emergency department with emergency severity index scores of 3 or 4 had an average wait of 1 hour and 15 minutes to see a provider compared with those with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2 who had an average wait of 43 minutes. Implementation of a pediatric respiratory score in emergency department triage formed the basis of a 15-week quality improvement initiative. The aim was to reduce wait times for pediatric patients requiring pediatric intensive care unit care owing to respiratory distress and to decrease door-to-provider and door-to-transfer times.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Staff were trained over 1 week on respiratory score use. Weekly data were collected on nurse respiratory score utilization for all pediatric respiratory patients, percentage of respiratory patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with the correct emergency severity index level of 1 or 2, and average door-to-provider and door-to-transport times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 59 patients were transferred for respiratory distress; 86.5% of these were correctly triaged with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2, which was an improvement from 78% the previous year. Average door-to-provider time was 15 minutes for transferred patients with a respiratory score and 20 minutes for those without. Average door-to-transport time was less than 10 hours for both groups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The pediatric respiratory score can improve patient assessment at the point of triage. Since implementing the pediatric respiratory score, wait times have improved for patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with a respiratory complaint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Emergency Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.011\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2025.03.011","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:呼吸窘迫是儿科急诊科常见的症状,需要及时治疗以避免不良预后。一项大型社区医院儿科急诊科的回顾性图表回顾显示,因呼吸相关疾病转至儿科重症监护病房的0至12岁无上门就诊患者中,有22%的患者的急诊严重程度指数评分为3或4。从医院儿科急诊科转来的急诊严重程度指数为3或4的患者平均等待1小时15分钟,而急诊严重程度指数为1或2的患者平均等待时间为43分钟。在急诊科分诊中实施儿科呼吸评分形成了为期15周的质量改进倡议的基础。目的是减少因呼吸窘迫而需要儿科重症监护病房护理的儿科患者的等待时间,并减少从门到提供者和从门到转院的时间。方法:对工作人员进行为期1周的呼吸评分使用培训。每周收集所有儿科呼吸系统患者的护士呼吸评分利用率数据,正确的紧急严重程度指数为1或2的呼吸道患者转至儿科重症监护病房的百分比,以及门到提供者和门到运输的平均时间。结果:共有59例患者因呼吸窘迫转诊;其中86.5%的人被正确分类为紧急程度指数为1或2级,比去年的78%有所改善。有呼吸评分的转院患者从门到提供者的平均时间为15分钟,没有呼吸评分的转院患者为20分钟。两组人从门口到运输的平均时间都不到10小时。讨论:儿科呼吸评分可以改善患者在分诊时的评估。自实施儿科呼吸评分以来,因呼吸道疾病转到儿科重症监护病房的患者的等待时间有所改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pediatric Respiratory Score in the Triage Form.

Introduction: Respiratory distress is a common pediatric presentation in emergency departments requiring prompt treatment to avoid poor outcomes. A retrospective chart review at a large community hospital pediatric emergency department revealed that 22% of walk-in patients 0 to 12 years old, who were transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit for a respiratory-related complaint, were undertriaged with an emergency severity index score of 3 or 4. The transferred patients from the hospital's pediatric emergency department with emergency severity index scores of 3 or 4 had an average wait of 1 hour and 15 minutes to see a provider compared with those with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2 who had an average wait of 43 minutes. Implementation of a pediatric respiratory score in emergency department triage formed the basis of a 15-week quality improvement initiative. The aim was to reduce wait times for pediatric patients requiring pediatric intensive care unit care owing to respiratory distress and to decrease door-to-provider and door-to-transfer times.

Methods: Staff were trained over 1 week on respiratory score use. Weekly data were collected on nurse respiratory score utilization for all pediatric respiratory patients, percentage of respiratory patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with the correct emergency severity index level of 1 or 2, and average door-to-provider and door-to-transport times.

Results: A total of 59 patients were transferred for respiratory distress; 86.5% of these were correctly triaged with an emergency severity index level 1 or 2, which was an improvement from 78% the previous year. Average door-to-provider time was 15 minutes for transferred patients with a respiratory score and 20 minutes for those without. Average door-to-transport time was less than 10 hours for both groups.

Discussion: The pediatric respiratory score can improve patient assessment at the point of triage. Since implementing the pediatric respiratory score, wait times have improved for patients transferred to a pediatric intensive care unit with a respiratory complaint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信