心脏手术后慢性疼痛的发生率和双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Burhan Dost, Elif Sarıkaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Deniz Karakaya, Mustafa Kemal Demirag, Sezgin Bilgin, Alessandro De Cassai, Hesham Elsharkawy
{"title":"心脏手术后慢性疼痛的发生率和双侧竖脊肌平面阻滞的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Burhan Dost, Elif Sarıkaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Deniz Karakaya, Mustafa Kemal Demirag, Sezgin Bilgin, Alessandro De Cassai, Hesham Elsharkawy","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2025-106591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block on chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery remain unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of bilateral ESP block in reducing the incidence and severity of CPSP after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 63 patients aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Participants received a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block or standard care without regional anesthesia. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption in the first 24 hours; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores during rest/activity at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours; BPI scores at 6 months postoperatively; and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BPI scores of the two groups did not differ significantly at 3 months postoperatively (median (IQR): 0(26) vs 12 (31), p=0.166). However, 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption (8 mg vs 10.5 mg, p<0.001) and NRS scores at multiple time points were significantly lower in the ESP block group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the BPI, DN4, or HADS scores at three or 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESP block effectively reduced acute pain and opioid consumption; however, it had no significant effect on the incidence or severity of CPSP at 3 and 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery and the effect of bilateral erector spinae plane block: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Burhan Dost, Elif Sarıkaya Ozel, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Deniz Karakaya, Mustafa Kemal Demirag, Sezgin Bilgin, Alessandro De Cassai, Hesham Elsharkawy\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2025-106591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block on chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery remain unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of bilateral ESP block in reducing the incidence and severity of CPSP after cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 63 patients aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Participants received a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block or standard care without regional anesthesia. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption in the first 24 hours; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores during rest/activity at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours; BPI scores at 6 months postoperatively; and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BPI scores of the two groups did not differ significantly at 3 months postoperatively (median (IQR): 0(26) vs 12 (31), p=0.166). However, 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption (8 mg vs 10.5 mg, p<0.001) and NRS scores at multiple time points were significantly lower in the ESP block group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the BPI, DN4, or HADS scores at three or 6 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ESP block effectively reduced acute pain and opioid consumption; however, it had no significant effect on the incidence or severity of CPSP at 3 and 6 months.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106591\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106591","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:竖脊平面(ESP)阻滞对心脏手术后慢性术后疼痛(CPSP)的影响尚不清楚。本研究评估双侧ESP阻滞在降低心脏手术后CPSP发生率和严重程度方面的效果。方法:本前瞻性、随机、对照、单盲试验纳入63例年龄18-80岁,美国麻醉医师学会身体状况II-III级的患者,计划择期胸骨正中切开术行心脏手术。参与者接受双侧超声引导的ESP阻滞或无区域麻醉的标准治疗。主要观察指标为术后3个月的短期疼痛量表(BPI)评分。次要结局包括前24小时吗啡用量;数值评定量表(NRS)在0、3、6、12和24小时休息/活动时的评分;术后6个月BPI评分;术后3个月和6个月的双重神经症4 (DN4)和医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)评分。结果:两组术后3个月BPI评分无显著差异(中位(IQR): 0(26) vs 12 (31), p=0.166)。结论:ESP阻滞可有效减少急性疼痛和阿片类药物的消耗;然而,在3个月和6个月时,它对CPSP的发生率和严重程度没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of chronic postsurgical pain after cardiac surgery and the effect of bilateral erector spinae plane block: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: The effects of the erector spinae plane (ESP) block on chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery remain unclear. This study evaluated the efficacy of bilateral ESP block in reducing the incidence and severity of CPSP after cardiac surgery.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial included 63 patients aged 18-80 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status II-III, scheduled for elective cardiac surgery via median sternotomy. Participants received a bilateral ultrasound-guided ESP block or standard care without regional anesthesia. The primary outcome was the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) score at 3 months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included morphine consumption in the first 24 hours; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores during rest/activity at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours; BPI scores at 6 months postoperatively; and Douleur Neuropathique 4 (DN4) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

Results: The BPI scores of the two groups did not differ significantly at 3 months postoperatively (median (IQR): 0(26) vs 12 (31), p=0.166). However, 24 hours postoperative morphine consumption (8 mg vs 10.5 mg, p<0.001) and NRS scores at multiple time points were significantly lower in the ESP block group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of the BPI, DN4, or HADS scores at three or 6 months.

Conclusions: The ESP block effectively reduced acute pain and opioid consumption; however, it had no significant effect on the incidence or severity of CPSP at 3 and 6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信