一项前瞻性队列研究:采用ct扫描数据库设计解剖无骨水泥椎体(SPS Evolution),并插入3D ct扫描术前计划,获得良好的长期疗效。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Elhadi Sariali, Sena Boukhelifa
{"title":"一项前瞻性队列研究:采用ct扫描数据库设计解剖无骨水泥椎体(SPS Evolution),并插入3D ct扫描术前计划,获得良好的长期疗效。","authors":"Elhadi Sariali, Sena Boukhelifa","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, improved hip reconstruction accuracy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was reported with a specific anatomic stem featuring helicoidal torsion and a double sagittal curvature (SPS Evolution™), compared to the standard double-tapered straight stem, which remains the most widely used design globally. However, no studies have analyzed the ten-year outcomes of THA using this stem. The objective of this study was to assess the survivorship of SPS Evolution™ at ten-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The use of the modified SPS Evolution™ design provides excellent long-term fixation, a low risk of stress shielding and thigh pain, and a reduced dislocation rate.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study included 134 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between December 2011 and December 2013. An anatomic stem (SPS Evolution™) with exclusive proximal surface treatment, a cementless acetabular component, and a Delta ceramic-ceramic bearing couple were used in all patients. In total, 102 patients (118 hips), with a mean age of 60 ± 11 years (range, 32-83 years), were evaluated after an average follow-up of 10.6 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-12 years), using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) self-assessment questionnaires. The fixation and stability of the femoral stem were assessed using the Engh and ARA scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An early femoral revision was performed on a 69-year-old woman following a post-traumatic femoral fracture. With aseptic loosening as the endpoint, the survival rate was 100% in 118 hips (95% CI, 96.7-100%) at 10 years. Excellent clinical outcomes were observed, with a mean HHS score of 97.6 ± 6.2 (range, 69-100) and an OHS score of 44.9 ± 5.2 (range, 23-48). All stems were found to be stable and well-osseointegrated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SPS Evolution™ stem demonstrated an excellent ten-year survival rate. In addition to precise hip reconstruction, it provided excellent clinical and radiological outcomes, indicating that the SPS Evolution™ is a reliable and \"conservative\" implant.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, prospective cohort study without control group.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104245"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Excellent long-term outcomes with an anatomic cementless stem (SPS Evolution) designed using a CT-scan database and inserted with 3D CT-scan preoperative planning: A prospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Elhadi Sariali, Sena Boukhelifa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recently, improved hip reconstruction accuracy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was reported with a specific anatomic stem featuring helicoidal torsion and a double sagittal curvature (SPS Evolution™), compared to the standard double-tapered straight stem, which remains the most widely used design globally. However, no studies have analyzed the ten-year outcomes of THA using this stem. The objective of this study was to assess the survivorship of SPS Evolution™ at ten-year follow-up.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The use of the modified SPS Evolution™ design provides excellent long-term fixation, a low risk of stress shielding and thigh pain, and a reduced dislocation rate.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>A prospective cohort study included 134 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between December 2011 and December 2013. An anatomic stem (SPS Evolution™) with exclusive proximal surface treatment, a cementless acetabular component, and a Delta ceramic-ceramic bearing couple were used in all patients. In total, 102 patients (118 hips), with a mean age of 60 ± 11 years (range, 32-83 years), were evaluated after an average follow-up of 10.6 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-12 years), using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) self-assessment questionnaires. The fixation and stability of the femoral stem were assessed using the Engh and ARA scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An early femoral revision was performed on a 69-year-old woman following a post-traumatic femoral fracture. With aseptic loosening as the endpoint, the survival rate was 100% in 118 hips (95% CI, 96.7-100%) at 10 years. Excellent clinical outcomes were observed, with a mean HHS score of 97.6 ± 6.2 (range, 69-100) and an OHS score of 44.9 ± 5.2 (range, 23-48). All stems were found to be stable and well-osseointegrated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SPS Evolution™ stem demonstrated an excellent ten-year survival rate. In addition to precise hip reconstruction, it provided excellent clinical and radiological outcomes, indicating that the SPS Evolution™ is a reliable and \\\"conservative\\\" implant.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV, prospective cohort study without control group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"104245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104245\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104245","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:最近,与全球范围内使用最广泛的标准双锥形直柄相比,全髋关节置换术(THA)后采用具有螺旋扭转和双矢状曲率的特定解剖柄(SPS Evolution™)可提高髋关节重建精度。然而,没有研究使用该系统分析THA的10年结果。本研究的目的是在10年随访中评估SPS Evolution™的生存率。假设:使用改良的SPS Evolution™设计提供了良好的长期固定,低压力屏蔽和大腿疼痛的风险,并降低了脱位率。材料和方法:一项前瞻性队列研究纳入了2011年12月至2013年12月期间接受手术的134例连续患者。所有患者均使用解剖柄(SPS Evolution™)进行近端表面处理,无骨水泥髋臼组件和Delta陶瓷-陶瓷轴承对。采用Harris髋关节评分(HHS)和Oxford髋关节评分(OHS)自评问卷,平均随访10.6±0.6年(10-12年),对102例患者(118髋)进行评估,平均年龄60±11岁(范围32-83岁)。使用Engh和ARA评分评估股骨干的固定和稳定性。结果:对一名69岁的女性创伤后股骨骨折进行了早期股骨翻修。以无菌性松动为终点,118髋10年生存率为100% (95% CI, 96.7-100%)。临床结果良好,平均HHS评分为97.6±6.2(范围69-100),OHS评分为44.9±5.2(范围23-48)。所有骨干均稳定且骨结合良好。讨论:SPS Evolution™系统显示出良好的十年存活率。除了精确的髋关节重建外,它还提供了出色的临床和放射学结果,表明SPS Evolution™是一种可靠且“保守”的植入物。证据水平:IV,前瞻性队列研究,无对照组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Excellent long-term outcomes with an anatomic cementless stem (SPS Evolution) designed using a CT-scan database and inserted with 3D CT-scan preoperative planning: A prospective cohort study.

Background: Recently, improved hip reconstruction accuracy after total hip arthroplasty (THA) was reported with a specific anatomic stem featuring helicoidal torsion and a double sagittal curvature (SPS Evolution™), compared to the standard double-tapered straight stem, which remains the most widely used design globally. However, no studies have analyzed the ten-year outcomes of THA using this stem. The objective of this study was to assess the survivorship of SPS Evolution™ at ten-year follow-up.

Hypothesis: The use of the modified SPS Evolution™ design provides excellent long-term fixation, a low risk of stress shielding and thigh pain, and a reduced dislocation rate.

Material and methods: A prospective cohort study included 134 consecutive patients who underwent surgery between December 2011 and December 2013. An anatomic stem (SPS Evolution™) with exclusive proximal surface treatment, a cementless acetabular component, and a Delta ceramic-ceramic bearing couple were used in all patients. In total, 102 patients (118 hips), with a mean age of 60 ± 11 years (range, 32-83 years), were evaluated after an average follow-up of 10.6 ± 0.6 years (range, 10-12 years), using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) self-assessment questionnaires. The fixation and stability of the femoral stem were assessed using the Engh and ARA scores.

Results: An early femoral revision was performed on a 69-year-old woman following a post-traumatic femoral fracture. With aseptic loosening as the endpoint, the survival rate was 100% in 118 hips (95% CI, 96.7-100%) at 10 years. Excellent clinical outcomes were observed, with a mean HHS score of 97.6 ± 6.2 (range, 69-100) and an OHS score of 44.9 ± 5.2 (range, 23-48). All stems were found to be stable and well-osseointegrated.

Discussion: The SPS Evolution™ stem demonstrated an excellent ten-year survival rate. In addition to precise hip reconstruction, it provided excellent clinical and radiological outcomes, indicating that the SPS Evolution™ is a reliable and "conservative" implant.

Level of evidence: IV, prospective cohort study without control group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信