慢性腰痛患者疼痛灾变、运动恐惧、中枢敏化与认知功能的关系。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Cory Alcon, Cassidy Krieger, Kaley Neal
{"title":"慢性腰痛患者疼痛灾变、运动恐惧、中枢敏化与认知功能的关系。","authors":"Cory Alcon, Cassidy Krieger, Kaley Neal","doi":"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adverse pain behaviors and alterations in cognitive performance are shown to negatively impact the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Relationships between these variables are poorly recognized yet may impact the efficacy of interventions that target them. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between levels of pain catastrophizing (PC), kinesiophobia, central sensitization (CS) and cognitive performance in participants with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants 18-65 with CLBP completed pain behavior measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)) and cognitive performance tests (Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT), Comprehensive Trail Making Test - Second Edition (CTMT2), and the Coding test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SCWT performance was positively correlated with PCS and TSK whereas CTMT2 inhibitory control and set-shifting, as well as coding performance were each negatively correlated with PCS and TSK. The high PC group demonstrated significantly larger attentional interference times on the SCWT, poorer inhibitory control and set-shifting performance on the CTMT2, and lesser performance on the coding test than the low PC group. The high kinesiophobia group performed significantly poorer on the SCWT than the low kinesiophobia group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that PC and kinesiophobia have negative influences on cognitive performance in those with CLBP. Specifically, attentional interference, inhibitory control, set-shifting, and sustained working memory functions were affected. These deficits have the potential to influence how patients respond to therapeutic interventions of cognitive focus (i.e., pain neuroscience education) and highlight an important variable that should be considered when managing CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":50678,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Pain","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Relationship Between Pain Catastrophizing, Kinesiophobia, Central Sensitization and Cognitive Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Cory Alcon, Cassidy Krieger, Kaley Neal\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AJP.0000000000001293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Adverse pain behaviors and alterations in cognitive performance are shown to negatively impact the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Relationships between these variables are poorly recognized yet may impact the efficacy of interventions that target them. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between levels of pain catastrophizing (PC), kinesiophobia, central sensitization (CS) and cognitive performance in participants with CLBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants 18-65 with CLBP completed pain behavior measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)) and cognitive performance tests (Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT), Comprehensive Trail Making Test - Second Edition (CTMT2), and the Coding test).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SCWT performance was positively correlated with PCS and TSK whereas CTMT2 inhibitory control and set-shifting, as well as coding performance were each negatively correlated with PCS and TSK. The high PC group demonstrated significantly larger attentional interference times on the SCWT, poorer inhibitory control and set-shifting performance on the CTMT2, and lesser performance on the coding test than the low PC group. The high kinesiophobia group performed significantly poorer on the SCWT than the low kinesiophobia group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrates that PC and kinesiophobia have negative influences on cognitive performance in those with CLBP. Specifically, attentional interference, inhibitory control, set-shifting, and sustained working memory functions were affected. These deficits have the potential to influence how patients respond to therapeutic interventions of cognitive focus (i.e., pain neuroscience education) and highlight an important variable that should be considered when managing CLBP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50678,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001293\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0000000000001293","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不良的疼痛行为和认知表现的改变被证明对慢性腰痛(CLBP)的治疗有负面影响。这些变量之间的关系尚未得到充分认识,但可能会影响针对它们的干预措施的效果。本研究旨在探讨CLBP患者疼痛灾难化(PC)、运动恐惧症(kinesiophobia)、中枢敏化(CS)水平与认知表现之间的关系。方法:18-65岁CLBP患者完成疼痛行为测量(疼痛巨化量表(PCS)、坦帕运动恐惧症量表(TSK)、中枢敏化量表(CSI))和认知能力测试(Stroop颜色单词测试(SCWT)、综合线索制作测试-第二版(cttmt2)和编码测试)。结果:SCWT表现与PCS和TSK呈正相关,cttmt2抑制控制、集移、编码表现与PCS和TSK均呈负相关。高PC组在SCWT上的注意干扰次数显著大于低PC组,在cttmt2上的抑制控制和集移表现较差,在编码测试上的表现也低于低PC组。高运动恐惧症组在SCWT上的表现明显差于低运动恐惧症组。讨论:本研究表明,PC和运动恐惧症对CLBP患者的认知表现有负面影响。具体而言,注意干扰、抑制控制、设定转移和持续工作记忆功能受到影响。这些缺陷有可能影响患者对认知焦点治疗干预(即疼痛神经科学教育)的反应,并突出了在处理CLBP时应考虑的一个重要变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Relationship Between Pain Catastrophizing, Kinesiophobia, Central Sensitization and Cognitive Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Objectives: Adverse pain behaviors and alterations in cognitive performance are shown to negatively impact the management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). Relationships between these variables are poorly recognized yet may impact the efficacy of interventions that target them. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between levels of pain catastrophizing (PC), kinesiophobia, central sensitization (CS) and cognitive performance in participants with CLBP.

Methods: Participants 18-65 with CLBP completed pain behavior measures (Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)) and cognitive performance tests (Stroop Color Word Test (SCWT), Comprehensive Trail Making Test - Second Edition (CTMT2), and the Coding test).

Results: SCWT performance was positively correlated with PCS and TSK whereas CTMT2 inhibitory control and set-shifting, as well as coding performance were each negatively correlated with PCS and TSK. The high PC group demonstrated significantly larger attentional interference times on the SCWT, poorer inhibitory control and set-shifting performance on the CTMT2, and lesser performance on the coding test than the low PC group. The high kinesiophobia group performed significantly poorer on the SCWT than the low kinesiophobia group.

Discussion: This study demonstrates that PC and kinesiophobia have negative influences on cognitive performance in those with CLBP. Specifically, attentional interference, inhibitory control, set-shifting, and sustained working memory functions were affected. These deficits have the potential to influence how patients respond to therapeutic interventions of cognitive focus (i.e., pain neuroscience education) and highlight an important variable that should be considered when managing CLBP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Journal of Pain
Clinical Journal of Pain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
118
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​The Clinical Journal of Pain explores all aspects of pain and its effective treatment, bringing readers the insights of leading anesthesiologists, surgeons, internists, neurologists, orthopedists, psychiatrists and psychologists, clinical pharmacologists, and rehabilitation medicine specialists. This peer-reviewed journal presents timely and thought-provoking articles on clinical dilemmas in pain management; valuable diagnostic procedures; promising new pharmacological, surgical, and other therapeutic modalities; psychosocial dimensions of pain; and ethical issues of concern to all medical professionals. The journal also publishes Special Topic issues on subjects of particular relevance to the practice of pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信