谵妄患病率,干预措施和障碍在重症监护病房在德语国家:回顾性横断面二次分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Matthias Thomas Exl, Sibylle Fischbacher, Heidi Lindroth, Keibun Liu, Magdalena Hoffmann, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Peter Nydahl, Rebecca von Haken, Lars Krüger, Florian Schimböck
{"title":"谵妄患病率,干预措施和障碍在重症监护病房在德语国家:回顾性横断面二次分析。","authors":"Matthias Thomas Exl, Sibylle Fischbacher, Heidi Lindroth, Keibun Liu, Magdalena Hoffmann, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Peter Nydahl, Rebecca von Haken, Lars Krüger, Florian Schimböck","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs) is high and has a major impact on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe delirium assessment instruments, prevalence, interventions and barriers in delirium management in adult and paediatric ICUs; and to explore the association between delirium prevalence and reported interventions and barriers at unit level.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A secondary analysis of the cross-sectional World Delirium Awareness Day Delirium Survey on 15 March 2023. This was a prospective study to assess the one-day point delirium prevalence, practices and quality improvement efforts across healthcare systems. Data was analysed descriptively and using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 1612 assessments in 123 ICUs from three German-speaking countries were analysed. The most frequently used delirium assessment instrument was the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (43.9%, n = 54). The prevalence of delirium at 8 AM was 18.6% and at 8 PM 20.4% from the 94 ICUs included in the regression analyses. Prevalence for adult and paediatric and mixed ICUs are comparable. Main reported over all unit-level interventions were 'pain management' (95.9%, n = 118), 'mobilization' (94.3%, n = 116) and 'verbal re-orientation' (84.6%, n = 104). Main reported over all unit-level barriers were 'shortage of staff' (53.7%, n = 66) and 'patients who are difficult to assess' (44.7%, n = 55). Interventions such as 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters' in all ICUs, 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' in adult ICUs and 'mobilization' in paediatric and mixed ICUs were associated with reduced delirium prevalence. Across all ICUs, as well as in both adult and paediatric ICUs, 'lack of appropriate scores for delirium assessment' was identified as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One fifth of assessed ICU patients suffer from delirium. Several reported unit-level interventions and barriers may have an impact on delirium prevalence, suggesting an approach for future studies and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>In clinical practice, unit-level 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters', 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' and 'mobilization' may be used as delirium prevention and treatment interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70041"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Delirium prevalence, interventions and barriers in intensive care units in German-speaking countries: A retrospective cross-sectional secondary analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Thomas Exl, Sibylle Fischbacher, Heidi Lindroth, Keibun Liu, Magdalena Hoffmann, Marie-Madlen Jeitziner, Peter Nydahl, Rebecca von Haken, Lars Krüger, Florian Schimböck\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70041\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs) is high and has a major impact on patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe delirium assessment instruments, prevalence, interventions and barriers in delirium management in adult and paediatric ICUs; and to explore the association between delirium prevalence and reported interventions and barriers at unit level.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A secondary analysis of the cross-sectional World Delirium Awareness Day Delirium Survey on 15 March 2023. This was a prospective study to assess the one-day point delirium prevalence, practices and quality improvement efforts across healthcare systems. Data was analysed descriptively and using multiple linear regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data of 1612 assessments in 123 ICUs from three German-speaking countries were analysed. The most frequently used delirium assessment instrument was the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (43.9%, n = 54). The prevalence of delirium at 8 AM was 18.6% and at 8 PM 20.4% from the 94 ICUs included in the regression analyses. Prevalence for adult and paediatric and mixed ICUs are comparable. Main reported over all unit-level interventions were 'pain management' (95.9%, n = 118), 'mobilization' (94.3%, n = 116) and 'verbal re-orientation' (84.6%, n = 104). Main reported over all unit-level barriers were 'shortage of staff' (53.7%, n = 66) and 'patients who are difficult to assess' (44.7%, n = 55). Interventions such as 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters' in all ICUs, 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' in adult ICUs and 'mobilization' in paediatric and mixed ICUs were associated with reduced delirium prevalence. Across all ICUs, as well as in both adult and paediatric ICUs, 'lack of appropriate scores for delirium assessment' was identified as a significant barrier.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>One fifth of assessed ICU patients suffer from delirium. Several reported unit-level interventions and barriers may have an impact on delirium prevalence, suggesting an approach for future studies and clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>In clinical practice, unit-level 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters', 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' and 'mobilization' may be used as delirium prevention and treatment interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"e70041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70041\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70041","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:谵妄在重症监护病房(icu)的患病率很高,对患者预后有重大影响。目的:描述谵妄评估工具、患病率、干预措施和障碍在成人和儿科重症监护病房谵妄管理;并探讨谵妄患病率与报告的干预措施和单位水平障碍之间的关系。研究设计:对2023年3月15日“世界谵妄意识日”谵妄调查进行二次分析。这是一项前瞻性研究,旨在评估整个医疗系统中一天点谵妄的患病率、实践和质量改进工作。对数据进行描述性和多元线性回归分析。结果:对三个德语国家123例icu的1612例评估数据进行分析。最常用的谵妄评估工具是重症监护谵妄筛查清单(43.9%,n = 54)。回归分析纳入的94例icu中,上午8点谵妄患病率为18.6%,晚上8点谵妄患病率为20.4%。成人和儿科以及混合icu的患病率具有可比性。在所有单位层面的干预措施中,主要报告的是“疼痛管理”(95.9%,n = 118)、“动员”(94.3%,n = 116)和“语言再定向”(84.6%,n = 104)。在所有单位层面的障碍中,报告的主要障碍是“人员短缺”(53.7%,n = 66)和“难以评估的患者”(44.7%,n = 55)。在所有icu中“避免使用膀胱管/导尿管”、在成人icu中“使用耳塞和/或睡眠眼镜”以及在儿科和混合icu中“动员”等干预措施与谵妄患病率降低相关。在所有icu中,以及在成人和儿科icu中,“缺乏谵妄评估的适当评分”被认为是一个重大障碍。结论:五分之一的ICU患者存在谵妄。一些报道的单位水平的干预措施和障碍可能对谵妄的患病率有影响,这为未来的研究和临床实践提供了一种方法。与临床实践的相关性:在临床实践中,单位层面的“避免使用膀胱管/导尿管”、“使用耳塞和/或睡眠眼镜”和“动员”可作为谵妄的预防和治疗干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Delirium prevalence, interventions and barriers in intensive care units in German-speaking countries: A retrospective cross-sectional secondary analysis.

Background: The prevalence of delirium in intensive care units (ICUs) is high and has a major impact on patient outcomes.

Aim: To describe delirium assessment instruments, prevalence, interventions and barriers in delirium management in adult and paediatric ICUs; and to explore the association between delirium prevalence and reported interventions and barriers at unit level.

Study design: A secondary analysis of the cross-sectional World Delirium Awareness Day Delirium Survey on 15 March 2023. This was a prospective study to assess the one-day point delirium prevalence, practices and quality improvement efforts across healthcare systems. Data was analysed descriptively and using multiple linear regression.

Results: Data of 1612 assessments in 123 ICUs from three German-speaking countries were analysed. The most frequently used delirium assessment instrument was the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (43.9%, n = 54). The prevalence of delirium at 8 AM was 18.6% and at 8 PM 20.4% from the 94 ICUs included in the regression analyses. Prevalence for adult and paediatric and mixed ICUs are comparable. Main reported over all unit-level interventions were 'pain management' (95.9%, n = 118), 'mobilization' (94.3%, n = 116) and 'verbal re-orientation' (84.6%, n = 104). Main reported over all unit-level barriers were 'shortage of staff' (53.7%, n = 66) and 'patients who are difficult to assess' (44.7%, n = 55). Interventions such as 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters' in all ICUs, 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' in adult ICUs and 'mobilization' in paediatric and mixed ICUs were associated with reduced delirium prevalence. Across all ICUs, as well as in both adult and paediatric ICUs, 'lack of appropriate scores for delirium assessment' was identified as a significant barrier.

Conclusions: One fifth of assessed ICU patients suffer from delirium. Several reported unit-level interventions and barriers may have an impact on delirium prevalence, suggesting an approach for future studies and clinical practice.

Relevance to clinical practice: In clinical practice, unit-level 'avoidance of bladder tubes/catheters', 'use of ear plugs and/or sleep glasses' and 'mobilization' may be used as delirium prevention and treatment interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信