Abirami Kirubarajan, Seoyeon Han, Anna Gryn, Priyanka Patel, Zuhal Mohmand, Natalie Morson, Mara Sobel
{"title":"宫内节育器插入过程中疼痛控制的障碍和促进因素:一项多中心医师调查。","authors":"Abirami Kirubarajan, Seoyeon Han, Anna Gryn, Priyanka Patel, Zuhal Mohmand, Natalie Morson, Mara Sobel","doi":"10.1080/13625187.2025.2460015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate physicians' barriers and facilitators, as well as knowledge, practices, attitudes, and beliefs, regarding analgesia for IUD insertion.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A multi-center online survey was conducted from January to July 2023 in Ontario, Canada. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 providers who responded to the survey, there was a lack of consensus regarding provision of analgesia for IUD insertion, as only 52.9% routinely provided pain control. The remaining 40 providers (47.1%) stated that they do not routinely provide pain control for IUD insertion, although 87.5% of participants stated that they would provide pain control if the patient specifically requested analgesia. No differences were found between academic and community staff (<i>p</i> = 0.94) or less experienced providers in provision of pain control (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Reasons for provision of pain control included patient comfort, care, and procedure safety. Conversely, other physicians believed the pain was minimal or short-lived, or faced logistical barriers in providing analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and providers should engage in shared decision-making regarding pain control for IUD insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":50491,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"144-148"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and facilitators for providing pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a multi-center physician survey.\",\"authors\":\"Abirami Kirubarajan, Seoyeon Han, Anna Gryn, Priyanka Patel, Zuhal Mohmand, Natalie Morson, Mara Sobel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13625187.2025.2460015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate physicians' barriers and facilitators, as well as knowledge, practices, attitudes, and beliefs, regarding analgesia for IUD insertion.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A multi-center online survey was conducted from January to July 2023 in Ontario, Canada. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, and thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 85 providers who responded to the survey, there was a lack of consensus regarding provision of analgesia for IUD insertion, as only 52.9% routinely provided pain control. The remaining 40 providers (47.1%) stated that they do not routinely provide pain control for IUD insertion, although 87.5% of participants stated that they would provide pain control if the patient specifically requested analgesia. No differences were found between academic and community staff (<i>p</i> = 0.94) or less experienced providers in provision of pain control (<i>p</i> = 0.24). Reasons for provision of pain control included patient comfort, care, and procedure safety. Conversely, other physicians believed the pain was minimal or short-lived, or faced logistical barriers in providing analgesia.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients and providers should engage in shared decision-making regarding pain control for IUD insertion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"144-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2025.2460015\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13625187.2025.2460015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Barriers and facilitators for providing pain control during intrauterine device insertion: a multi-center physician survey.
Purpose: To evaluate physicians' barriers and facilitators, as well as knowledge, practices, attitudes, and beliefs, regarding analgesia for IUD insertion.
Methodology: A multi-center online survey was conducted from January to July 2023 in Ontario, Canada. Data was analysed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, ANOVA, and thematic analysis.
Results: Among 85 providers who responded to the survey, there was a lack of consensus regarding provision of analgesia for IUD insertion, as only 52.9% routinely provided pain control. The remaining 40 providers (47.1%) stated that they do not routinely provide pain control for IUD insertion, although 87.5% of participants stated that they would provide pain control if the patient specifically requested analgesia. No differences were found between academic and community staff (p = 0.94) or less experienced providers in provision of pain control (p = 0.24). Reasons for provision of pain control included patient comfort, care, and procedure safety. Conversely, other physicians believed the pain was minimal or short-lived, or faced logistical barriers in providing analgesia.
Conclusions: Patients and providers should engage in shared decision-making regarding pain control for IUD insertion.
期刊介绍:
The Official Journal of the European Society of Contraception and Reproductive Health, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care publishes original peer-reviewed research papers as well as review papers and other appropriate educational material.