初级保健中的复杂心理健康困难:专题综合的范围审查。

IF 2.5 Q2 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
BJGP Open Pub Date : 2025-05-07 DOI:10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0223
Kritica Dwivedi, Vyv Huddy, Phillip Oliver, Chris Burton
{"title":"初级保健中的复杂心理健康困难:专题综合的范围审查。","authors":"Kritica Dwivedi, Vyv Huddy, Phillip Oliver, Chris Burton","doi":"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex Mental Health Difficulties (CMHD) is an umbrella term for long-term problems with emotions and relationships, including personality disorders, persistent depression and consequences of trauma. People with CMHD often fall between NHS services that focus on either common mental disorders (anxiety, depression) or psychosis, leaving GPs as their main source of support.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand what is known about primary care for CMHD, from both GP and patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of GP and patient experiences of CMHD in primary care in UK, Europe, Australasia and North America.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Medline, PsycInfo and Embase for eligible studies between January 2002-October 2023. Titles and full texts were screened by two reviewers. Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 2209 papers and 33 met inclusion criteria. Three key themes were found: the challenge of recognising CMHD, its impact on primary care workload, and patient priorities. GPs recognised CMHD through complexity of diagnoses, of psychosocial issues and of healthcare use. However, they were ambivalent about diagnosis and lacked the resources to make or discuss diagnoses. Working with people with CMHD involved responsibility work, relationship work, and emotional work, under pressured conditions. Patient priorities included addressing stigma, reducing fragmentation and receiving relationship-focused care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review delineates the very real challenges people with CMHD and their GPs face in providing care. It helps set an agenda for work to address gaps in provision and improve outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":36541,"journal":{"name":"BJGP Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Complex mental health difficulties in primary care: scoping review with thematic synthesis.\",\"authors\":\"Kritica Dwivedi, Vyv Huddy, Phillip Oliver, Chris Burton\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Complex Mental Health Difficulties (CMHD) is an umbrella term for long-term problems with emotions and relationships, including personality disorders, persistent depression and consequences of trauma. People with CMHD often fall between NHS services that focus on either common mental disorders (anxiety, depression) or psychosis, leaving GPs as their main source of support.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To understand what is known about primary care for CMHD, from both GP and patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Design & setting: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of GP and patient experiences of CMHD in primary care in UK, Europe, Australasia and North America.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We searched Medline, PsycInfo and Embase for eligible studies between January 2002-October 2023. Titles and full texts were screened by two reviewers. Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies were undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We screened 2209 papers and 33 met inclusion criteria. Three key themes were found: the challenge of recognising CMHD, its impact on primary care workload, and patient priorities. GPs recognised CMHD through complexity of diagnoses, of psychosocial issues and of healthcare use. However, they were ambivalent about diagnosis and lacked the resources to make or discuss diagnoses. Working with people with CMHD involved responsibility work, relationship work, and emotional work, under pressured conditions. Patient priorities included addressing stigma, reducing fragmentation and receiving relationship-focused care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review delineates the very real challenges people with CMHD and their GPs face in providing care. It helps set an agenda for work to address gaps in provision and improve outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36541,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJGP Open\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJGP Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJGP Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:复杂心理健康困难(CMHD)是长期情绪和人际关系问题的总称,包括人格障碍、持续性抑郁和创伤后果。患有CMHD的人通常介于关注普通精神障碍(焦虑、抑郁)或精神病的NHS服务之间,这使得全科医生成为他们的主要支持来源。目的:从全科医生和患者的角度了解CMHD的初级保健。设计和背景:我们对英国、欧洲、澳大拉西亚和北美的初级保健中CMHD的全科医生和患者经验进行了范围审查。方法:检索Medline、PsycInfo和Embase,检索2002年1月至2023年10月间符合条件的研究。标题和全文由两名审稿人筛选。对定性研究进行了专题综合,对定量研究进行了叙述综合。结果:共筛选论文2209篇,符合纳入标准33篇。发现了三个关键主题:认识CMHD的挑战,其对初级保健工作量的影响,以及患者的优先事项。全科医生通过复杂的诊断、社会心理问题和医疗保健使用来识别CMHD。然而,他们对诊断的态度是矛盾的,并且缺乏做出诊断或讨论诊断的资源。在压力下与CMHD患者一起工作,包括责任工作、关系工作和情感工作。患者的优先事项包括解决耻辱,减少分裂和接受以关系为重点的护理。结论:本综述描述了CMHD患者及其全科医生在提供护理时面临的真正挑战。它有助于制定工作议程,以解决供应方面的差距并改善成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Complex mental health difficulties in primary care: scoping review with thematic synthesis.

Background: Complex Mental Health Difficulties (CMHD) is an umbrella term for long-term problems with emotions and relationships, including personality disorders, persistent depression and consequences of trauma. People with CMHD often fall between NHS services that focus on either common mental disorders (anxiety, depression) or psychosis, leaving GPs as their main source of support.

Aim: To understand what is known about primary care for CMHD, from both GP and patient perspectives.

Design & setting: We conducted a scoping review of GP and patient experiences of CMHD in primary care in UK, Europe, Australasia and North America.

Method: We searched Medline, PsycInfo and Embase for eligible studies between January 2002-October 2023. Titles and full texts were screened by two reviewers. Thematic synthesis of qualitative studies and narrative synthesis of quantitative studies were undertaken.

Results: We screened 2209 papers and 33 met inclusion criteria. Three key themes were found: the challenge of recognising CMHD, its impact on primary care workload, and patient priorities. GPs recognised CMHD through complexity of diagnoses, of psychosocial issues and of healthcare use. However, they were ambivalent about diagnosis and lacked the resources to make or discuss diagnoses. Working with people with CMHD involved responsibility work, relationship work, and emotional work, under pressured conditions. Patient priorities included addressing stigma, reducing fragmentation and receiving relationship-focused care.

Conclusion: This scoping review delineates the very real challenges people with CMHD and their GPs face in providing care. It helps set an agenda for work to address gaps in provision and improve outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJGP Open
BJGP Open Medicine-Family Practice
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信