牙科护士提供的复杂行为改变干预:回归干预的混合方法保真度评估。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-05-13 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-08856-0
V Lowers, P Christiansen, B Young, J Hennessy, R V Harris
{"title":"牙科护士提供的复杂行为改变干预:回归干预的混合方法保真度评估。","authors":"V Lowers, P Christiansen, B Young, J Hennessy, R V Harris","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-08856-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Behaviour change interventions delivered in dental settings could be useful in reducing oral health inequalities. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials testing interventions, however, are vulnerable to problems with internal and external validity. Intervention fidelity strategies are helpful to address methodological problems and to provide scientific assurances about trial results. This paper sets out the intervention fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention which was delivered in dental settings to promote planned dental visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment was guided by the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium intervention fidelity framework domains of training and delivery. A mixed-methods design was selected, using quantitative data collected during intervention delivery training, together with qualitative observations (n = 58), interviews (n = 13) and audio-recordings of intervention delivery sessions (n = 472). Data were analysed separately using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression for the quantitative data and reflexive thematic analysis for the qualitative data. Data were integrated to provide a comprehensive fidelity assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dental nurses were successfully trained to deliver the RETURN intervention; training was successfully standardised, and skills drift minimised. Training presented challenges, and not all nurses achieved competency sign-off to deliver the intervention independently. Nurse characteristics such as dental nursing experience, wider trial procedures and confidence were all found to impact training success. The RETURN intervention was judged to have been delivered with high levels of fidelity, despite few interventions reaching the pre-determined fidelity threshold. Fidelity levels of between 75% and 85% were achieved across intervention domains. Interventionist, intervention dose and intervention topic (dental visiting barrier) were all found to have a relationship with fidelity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental nurses can be trained to deliver a brief behaviour change intervention alongside their usual clinical roles, and this can be delivered with a high degree of intervention fidelity. The results from this fidelity assessment provide assurances about the scientific validity of the RETURN trial results. Recommendations about the suitability of dental nurse interventionists within future dental trials are discussed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN 84666712. Registered on 12/04/2021.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"156"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070712/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A complex behaviour change intervention delivered by dental nurses: mixed-methods fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention.\",\"authors\":\"V Lowers, P Christiansen, B Young, J Hennessy, R V Harris\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13063-025-08856-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Behaviour change interventions delivered in dental settings could be useful in reducing oral health inequalities. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials testing interventions, however, are vulnerable to problems with internal and external validity. Intervention fidelity strategies are helpful to address methodological problems and to provide scientific assurances about trial results. This paper sets out the intervention fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention which was delivered in dental settings to promote planned dental visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The assessment was guided by the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium intervention fidelity framework domains of training and delivery. A mixed-methods design was selected, using quantitative data collected during intervention delivery training, together with qualitative observations (n = 58), interviews (n = 13) and audio-recordings of intervention delivery sessions (n = 472). Data were analysed separately using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression for the quantitative data and reflexive thematic analysis for the qualitative data. Data were integrated to provide a comprehensive fidelity assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dental nurses were successfully trained to deliver the RETURN intervention; training was successfully standardised, and skills drift minimised. Training presented challenges, and not all nurses achieved competency sign-off to deliver the intervention independently. Nurse characteristics such as dental nursing experience, wider trial procedures and confidence were all found to impact training success. The RETURN intervention was judged to have been delivered with high levels of fidelity, despite few interventions reaching the pre-determined fidelity threshold. Fidelity levels of between 75% and 85% were achieved across intervention domains. Interventionist, intervention dose and intervention topic (dental visiting barrier) were all found to have a relationship with fidelity levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dental nurses can be trained to deliver a brief behaviour change intervention alongside their usual clinical roles, and this can be delivered with a high degree of intervention fidelity. The results from this fidelity assessment provide assurances about the scientific validity of the RETURN trial results. Recommendations about the suitability of dental nurse interventionists within future dental trials are discussed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ISRCTN 84666712. Registered on 12/04/2021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trials\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"156\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070712/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08856-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-08856-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在牙科环境中提供的行为改变干预措施可能有助于减少口腔卫生不平等现象。然而,测试干预措施的实用随机对照试验容易受到内部和外部有效性问题的影响。干预保真策略有助于解决方法学问题,并为试验结果提供科学保证。本文阐述了干预的保真度评估的回归干预是在牙科设置交付,以促进计划牙科就诊。方法:评估以美国国立卫生研究院行为改变联盟干预保真度框架培训和交付领域为指导。采用混合方法设计,使用干预交付培训期间收集的定量数据,以及定性观察(n = 58)、访谈(n = 13)和干预交付会话录音(n = 472)。定量数据分别采用描述性统计和多元逻辑回归分析,定性数据采用反身性专题分析。数据被整合以提供一个全面的保真度评估。结果:对牙科护士进行了成功的培训,使其能够实施RETURN干预;培训成功标准化,技能漂移最小化。培训带来了挑战,并不是所有的护士都获得了独立提供干预的能力。护士的特点,如牙科护理经验,更广泛的试验程序和信心都被发现影响培训的成功。尽管很少有干预达到预先确定的保真度阈值,但RETURN干预被判断为具有高水平的保真度。在各个干预领域,保真度达到75%至85%。干预医师、干预剂量、干预主题(访牙障碍)均与保真度相关。结论:牙科护士可以接受培训,提供简短的行为改变干预以及他们通常的临床角色,这可以提供高度的干预保真度。保真度评估的结果为回归试验结果的科学有效性提供了保证。讨论了今后牙科临床试验中牙科护理干预医师的适宜性。试验注册:ISRCTN 84666712。注册日期:12/04/2021
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A complex behaviour change intervention delivered by dental nurses: mixed-methods fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention.

Introduction: Behaviour change interventions delivered in dental settings could be useful in reducing oral health inequalities. Pragmatic randomised controlled trials testing interventions, however, are vulnerable to problems with internal and external validity. Intervention fidelity strategies are helpful to address methodological problems and to provide scientific assurances about trial results. This paper sets out the intervention fidelity assessment of the RETURN intervention which was delivered in dental settings to promote planned dental visits.

Methods: The assessment was guided by the National Institutes of Health Behaviour Change Consortium intervention fidelity framework domains of training and delivery. A mixed-methods design was selected, using quantitative data collected during intervention delivery training, together with qualitative observations (n = 58), interviews (n = 13) and audio-recordings of intervention delivery sessions (n = 472). Data were analysed separately using descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression for the quantitative data and reflexive thematic analysis for the qualitative data. Data were integrated to provide a comprehensive fidelity assessment.

Results: Dental nurses were successfully trained to deliver the RETURN intervention; training was successfully standardised, and skills drift minimised. Training presented challenges, and not all nurses achieved competency sign-off to deliver the intervention independently. Nurse characteristics such as dental nursing experience, wider trial procedures and confidence were all found to impact training success. The RETURN intervention was judged to have been delivered with high levels of fidelity, despite few interventions reaching the pre-determined fidelity threshold. Fidelity levels of between 75% and 85% were achieved across intervention domains. Interventionist, intervention dose and intervention topic (dental visiting barrier) were all found to have a relationship with fidelity levels.

Conclusions: Dental nurses can be trained to deliver a brief behaviour change intervention alongside their usual clinical roles, and this can be delivered with a high degree of intervention fidelity. The results from this fidelity assessment provide assurances about the scientific validity of the RETURN trial results. Recommendations about the suitability of dental nurse interventionists within future dental trials are discussed.

Trial registration: ISRCTN 84666712. Registered on 12/04/2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信