吲哚菁绿单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:倾向评分研究。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Feng Zhan, Lixia Yang, Yun Zhang, Yu Zhang, Kai Zhang, Chao Jiang
{"title":"吲哚菁绿单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术:倾向评分研究。","authors":"Feng Zhan, Lixia Yang, Yun Zhang, Yu Zhang, Kai Zhang, Chao Jiang","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_287_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging and traditional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in the treatment of benign gall bladder diseases.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 345 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from June 2023 to June 2024. Forty-two patients underwent SILC, and 303 underwent MPLC. After propensity score matching, 37 matched pairs were identified. Parameters compared included critical view of safety (CVS) exposure rate, bile duct injury rate, operative time, blood loss, post-operative hospitalisation, costs, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale questionnaire scores, complication rates and the learning curve evaluated by cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No conversions or bile duct injuries occurred. The SILC group had shorter hospital stay (2.6 ± 0.7 days vs. 4.2 ± 0.9 days) and lower pain VAS scores at 48 h (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4), but higher blood loss (19.4 ± 9.5 mL vs. 10.1 ± 4.2 mL) (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in CVS exposure, operative time, costs, pain scores at 24 h, complication rates or 30-day post-operative incisional satisfaction (P > 0.05). The CUSUM analysis showed the learning curve stabilised after 25 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG-assisted SILC demonstrates comparable safety and cost-effectiveness to MPLC, without increasing perioperative risks. With appropriate patient selection, it may be a viable option for broader implementation in primary healthcare settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with indocyanine green: A propensity score study.\",\"authors\":\"Feng Zhan, Lixia Yang, Yun Zhang, Yu Zhang, Kai Zhang, Chao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_287_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging and traditional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in the treatment of benign gall bladder diseases.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 345 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from June 2023 to June 2024. Forty-two patients underwent SILC, and 303 underwent MPLC. After propensity score matching, 37 matched pairs were identified. Parameters compared included critical view of safety (CVS) exposure rate, bile duct injury rate, operative time, blood loss, post-operative hospitalisation, costs, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale questionnaire scores, complication rates and the learning curve evaluated by cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No conversions or bile duct injuries occurred. The SILC group had shorter hospital stay (2.6 ± 0.7 days vs. 4.2 ± 0.9 days) and lower pain VAS scores at 48 h (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4), but higher blood loss (19.4 ± 9.5 mL vs. 10.1 ± 4.2 mL) (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in CVS exposure, operative time, costs, pain scores at 24 h, complication rates or 30-day post-operative incisional satisfaction (P > 0.05). The CUSUM analysis showed the learning curve stabilised after 25 cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICG-assisted SILC demonstrates comparable safety and cost-effectiveness to MPLC, without increasing perioperative risks. With appropriate patient selection, it may be a viable option for broader implementation in primary healthcare settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_287_24\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_287_24","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本研究旨在比较采用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光成像的单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SILC)与传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术(MPLC)治疗良性胆囊疾病的临床疗效。患者与方法:回顾性分析2023年6月至2024年6月行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的345例患者的临床资料。42例接受了SILC, 303例接受了MPLC。经倾向评分匹配后,鉴定出37对匹配的样本。比较的参数包括安全评价(CVS)暴露率、胆管损伤率、手术时间、出血量、术后住院、费用、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分、全球美学改善量表问卷评分、并发症发生率和累积和分析(CUSUM)评估的学习曲线。结果:未发生胆管损伤及胆转流。SILC组住院时间较短(2.6±0.7天比4.2±0.9天),48 h疼痛VAS评分较低(1.1±0.5比1.9±0.4),但出血量较高(19.4±9.5 mL比10.1±4.2 mL) (P < 0.05)。两组在CVS暴露、手术时间、费用、24 h疼痛评分、并发症发生率和术后30天切口满意度方面均无显著差异(P < 0.05)。CUSUM分析显示,学习曲线在25例后趋于稳定。结论:与MPLC相比,icg辅助SILC具有相当的安全性和成本效益,且不会增加围手术期风险。通过适当的患者选择,它可能是在初级卫生保健环境中广泛实施的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with indocyanine green: A propensity score study.

Introduction: This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging and traditional multi-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy (MPLC) in the treatment of benign gall bladder diseases.

Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 345 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy from June 2023 to June 2024. Forty-two patients underwent SILC, and 303 underwent MPLC. After propensity score matching, 37 matched pairs were identified. Parameters compared included critical view of safety (CVS) exposure rate, bile duct injury rate, operative time, blood loss, post-operative hospitalisation, costs, pain visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale questionnaire scores, complication rates and the learning curve evaluated by cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM).

Results: No conversions or bile duct injuries occurred. The SILC group had shorter hospital stay (2.6 ± 0.7 days vs. 4.2 ± 0.9 days) and lower pain VAS scores at 48 h (1.1 ± 0.5 vs. 1.9 ± 0.4), but higher blood loss (19.4 ± 9.5 mL vs. 10.1 ± 4.2 mL) (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in CVS exposure, operative time, costs, pain scores at 24 h, complication rates or 30-day post-operative incisional satisfaction (P > 0.05). The CUSUM analysis showed the learning curve stabilised after 25 cases.

Conclusions: ICG-assisted SILC demonstrates comparable safety and cost-effectiveness to MPLC, without increasing perioperative risks. With appropriate patient selection, it may be a viable option for broader implementation in primary healthcare settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信