探讨一种新型多模态前列腺癌放射治疗平台的剂量学优势。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jie Duan, Qinghui Yun, Zhongfei Wang, Te Zhang, Xiaohuan Sun, Hua Yang, Weiwei Li, Wei Wang, Hongfei Sun, Liting Chen, Yue Gao, Zhiwei Wei, Zhe Wang, Lina Zhao
{"title":"探讨一种新型多模态前列腺癌放射治疗平台的剂量学优势。","authors":"Jie Duan, Qinghui Yun, Zhongfei Wang, Te Zhang, Xiaohuan Sun, Hua Yang, Weiwei Li, Wei Wang, Hongfei Sun, Liting Chen, Yue Gao, Zhiwei Wei, Zhe Wang, Lina Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present research aims to explore the dosimetric advantages associated with a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB, which integrates a medical linac and a focused <sup>60</sup>Co γ-ray system. The primary focus of this investigation is to assess the efficacy of this platform in the treatment of prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted involving fifteen prostate patients. Each patient had two different treatment plans: a Varian linac x-ray plan (group A), and a TaiChiB plan combined with linac x rays and focused γ rays (group B). In both plan groups, the prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy, with a boost dose of 20 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). In the TaiChiB plan, the primary plan was delivered using linac x rays and the boost dose plan was delivered using γ rays. Different criteria were used to evaluate the plan quality and results from the two plan groups were compared through statistical analysis (p < 0.05 as significantly different). All plans from these two groups met the clinical requirements for treatment, and Gamma passing rates were above 95% using the 3%/2 mm criterion suggested by TG-218. Regarding the dose coverage to targets, the TaiChiB plan group had a higher mean dose to the GTV (77.46 ± 1.04 Gy (B) vs. 71.40 ± 0.33 Gy (A), p < 0.01), whereas it maintained a comparable mean dose to the PTV (55.33 ± 1.76 Gy (B) vs. 55.23 ± 1.92 Gy (A), non-significant). In terms of dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), the TaiChiB plan group showed a lower or comparable mean value. In detail, bladder V<sub>45Gy</sub> (43.90 ± 6.34% (B) vs. 49.83 ± 6.31% (A), p < 0.01); rectum V<sub>45Gy</sub> (38.45 ± 14.38% (B) vs. 51.46 ± 17.18%(A), p < 0.01); intestine V<sub>45Gy</sub> (163.88 ± 18.85 cm<sup>3</sup> (B) vs. 177.18 ± 18.20 cm<sup>3</sup> (A), p < 0.01); left femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (5.63 ± 1.97% (B) vs. 11.83 ± 2.56% (A), p < 0.01); and right femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (4.64 ± 1.94% (B) vs. 10.38 ± 2.73% (A), p < 0.01). The comparison of plan evaluation results showed the superiority of the novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB in dosimetric characteristics by harnessing the physical advantages of γ rays as a supplement to x rays in radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":48490,"journal":{"name":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the dosimetric advantages of a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform in prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Jie Duan, Qinghui Yun, Zhongfei Wang, Te Zhang, Xiaohuan Sun, Hua Yang, Weiwei Li, Wei Wang, Hongfei Sun, Liting Chen, Yue Gao, Zhiwei Wei, Zhe Wang, Lina Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present research aims to explore the dosimetric advantages associated with a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB, which integrates a medical linac and a focused <sup>60</sup>Co γ-ray system. The primary focus of this investigation is to assess the efficacy of this platform in the treatment of prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted involving fifteen prostate patients. Each patient had two different treatment plans: a Varian linac x-ray plan (group A), and a TaiChiB plan combined with linac x rays and focused γ rays (group B). In both plan groups, the prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy, with a boost dose of 20 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). In the TaiChiB plan, the primary plan was delivered using linac x rays and the boost dose plan was delivered using γ rays. Different criteria were used to evaluate the plan quality and results from the two plan groups were compared through statistical analysis (p < 0.05 as significantly different). All plans from these two groups met the clinical requirements for treatment, and Gamma passing rates were above 95% using the 3%/2 mm criterion suggested by TG-218. Regarding the dose coverage to targets, the TaiChiB plan group had a higher mean dose to the GTV (77.46 ± 1.04 Gy (B) vs. 71.40 ± 0.33 Gy (A), p < 0.01), whereas it maintained a comparable mean dose to the PTV (55.33 ± 1.76 Gy (B) vs. 55.23 ± 1.92 Gy (A), non-significant). In terms of dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), the TaiChiB plan group showed a lower or comparable mean value. In detail, bladder V<sub>45Gy</sub> (43.90 ± 6.34% (B) vs. 49.83 ± 6.31% (A), p < 0.01); rectum V<sub>45Gy</sub> (38.45 ± 14.38% (B) vs. 51.46 ± 17.18%(A), p < 0.01); intestine V<sub>45Gy</sub> (163.88 ± 18.85 cm<sup>3</sup> (B) vs. 177.18 ± 18.20 cm<sup>3</sup> (A), p < 0.01); left femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (5.63 ± 1.97% (B) vs. 11.83 ± 2.56% (A), p < 0.01); and right femoral head V<sub>30Gy</sub> (4.64 ± 1.94% (B) vs. 10.38 ± 2.73% (A), p < 0.01). The comparison of plan evaluation results showed the superiority of the novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB in dosimetric characteristics by harnessing the physical advantages of γ rays as a supplement to x rays in radiotherapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical and Engineering Sciences in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13246-025-01544-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探索新型多模态放射治疗平台TaiChiB的剂量学优势,该平台集成了医疗直线加速器和聚焦60Co γ射线系统。本研究的主要重点是评估该平台治疗前列腺癌的疗效。我们对15名前列腺患者进行了回顾性研究。每位患者有两种不同的治疗方案:瓦里安直线x射线计划(a组)和TaiChiB计划结合直线x射线和聚焦γ射线(B组)。在两个计划组中,计划靶体积(PTV)的规定剂量为50 Gy,总肿瘤体积(GTV)的增强剂量为20 Gy。在TaiChiB计划中,初级计划使用直线x射线,增强剂量计划使用γ射线。采用不同标准评价方案质量,并对两组方案结果进行统计学比较(p 45Gy(43.90±6.34%)vs. 49.83±6.31% (A), p 45Gy(38.45±14.38%)vs. 51.46±17.18%(A), p 45Gy(163.88±18.85 cm3 (B) vs. 177.18±18.20 cm3 (A), p 30Gy(5.63±1.97% (B) vs. 11.83±2.56% (A), p 30Gy(4.64±1.94% (B) vs. 10.38±2.73% (A), p 30Gy(4.64±1.94%)vs. 10.38±2.73% (A))
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the dosimetric advantages of a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform in prostate cancer.

The present research aims to explore the dosimetric advantages associated with a novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB, which integrates a medical linac and a focused 60Co γ-ray system. The primary focus of this investigation is to assess the efficacy of this platform in the treatment of prostate cancer. A retrospective study was conducted involving fifteen prostate patients. Each patient had two different treatment plans: a Varian linac x-ray plan (group A), and a TaiChiB plan combined with linac x rays and focused γ rays (group B). In both plan groups, the prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 50 Gy, with a boost dose of 20 Gy to the gross tumor volume (GTV). In the TaiChiB plan, the primary plan was delivered using linac x rays and the boost dose plan was delivered using γ rays. Different criteria were used to evaluate the plan quality and results from the two plan groups were compared through statistical analysis (p < 0.05 as significantly different). All plans from these two groups met the clinical requirements for treatment, and Gamma passing rates were above 95% using the 3%/2 mm criterion suggested by TG-218. Regarding the dose coverage to targets, the TaiChiB plan group had a higher mean dose to the GTV (77.46 ± 1.04 Gy (B) vs. 71.40 ± 0.33 Gy (A), p < 0.01), whereas it maintained a comparable mean dose to the PTV (55.33 ± 1.76 Gy (B) vs. 55.23 ± 1.92 Gy (A), non-significant). In terms of dose to organs-at-risk (OARs), the TaiChiB plan group showed a lower or comparable mean value. In detail, bladder V45Gy (43.90 ± 6.34% (B) vs. 49.83 ± 6.31% (A), p < 0.01); rectum V45Gy (38.45 ± 14.38% (B) vs. 51.46 ± 17.18%(A), p < 0.01); intestine V45Gy (163.88 ± 18.85 cm3 (B) vs. 177.18 ± 18.20 cm3 (A), p < 0.01); left femoral head V30Gy (5.63 ± 1.97% (B) vs. 11.83 ± 2.56% (A), p < 0.01); and right femoral head V30Gy (4.64 ± 1.94% (B) vs. 10.38 ± 2.73% (A), p < 0.01). The comparison of plan evaluation results showed the superiority of the novel multi-modality radiotherapy platform TaiChiB in dosimetric characteristics by harnessing the physical advantages of γ rays as a supplement to x rays in radiotherapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信