Maaike P Smit, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden, Reinoud J B J Gemke, Karsten A van Loon, Matthijs de Hoog
{"title":"居民在可信赖的专业活动培训中学习、工作和发展的经验。","authors":"Maaike P Smit, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden, Reinoud J B J Gemke, Karsten A van Loon, Matthijs de Hoog","doi":"10.5334/pme.1464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based residency programmes are designed to offer structure, flexibility, and a gradual increase in autonomy. While residents are expected to take an active role in their learning, little is known about how they actually experience learning and working within the EPA framework. This study explores paediatric residents' experiences of learning, working, and developing within an EPA-based training programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 11 paediatric residents from three of the seven Dutch training regions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and analysed using template analysis to identify themes related to residents' learning and professional development within EPA-based training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents described increasing confidence and competence in the phase prior to entrustment. Some linked this development to the EPA structure, as it supported goal setting and feedback-seeking, while others attributed this development primarily to learning through clinical experience.The entrustment decision process-particularly the Clinical Competence Committee (CCC) feedback-was seen as reassuring, though residents also described discomfort with being evaluated by a group. After entrustment, residents experienced greater autonomy but noted variation in supervision practices. Some felt unsure about when to request supervision, particularly in apparently straightforward settings. Others described feeling empowered to pursue individualised learning opportunities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In reflecting on these findings, we drew on the concept of Self-Regulated Learning to explore how residents engaged with their training. Making these principles more explicit within EPA-based programmes may support residents in optimising their learning and strengthen their preparation for independent practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":48532,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Medical Education","volume":"14 1","pages":"255-263"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Residents' Experiences of Learning, Working, and Developing in Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Training.\",\"authors\":\"Maaike P Smit, Janiëlle A E M van der Velden, Reinoud J B J Gemke, Karsten A van Loon, Matthijs de Hoog\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/pme.1464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based residency programmes are designed to offer structure, flexibility, and a gradual increase in autonomy. While residents are expected to take an active role in their learning, little is known about how they actually experience learning and working within the EPA framework. This study explores paediatric residents' experiences of learning, working, and developing within an EPA-based training programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 11 paediatric residents from three of the seven Dutch training regions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and analysed using template analysis to identify themes related to residents' learning and professional development within EPA-based training.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Residents described increasing confidence and competence in the phase prior to entrustment. Some linked this development to the EPA structure, as it supported goal setting and feedback-seeking, while others attributed this development primarily to learning through clinical experience.The entrustment decision process-particularly the Clinical Competence Committee (CCC) feedback-was seen as reassuring, though residents also described discomfort with being evaluated by a group. After entrustment, residents experienced greater autonomy but noted variation in supervision practices. Some felt unsure about when to request supervision, particularly in apparently straightforward settings. Others described feeling empowered to pursue individualised learning opportunities.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In reflecting on these findings, we drew on the concept of Self-Regulated Learning to explore how residents engaged with their training. Making these principles more explicit within EPA-based programmes may support residents in optimising their learning and strengthen their preparation for independent practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"255-263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12063573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1464\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/pme.1464","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Residents' Experiences of Learning, Working, and Developing in Entrustable Professional Activity-Based Training.
Introduction: Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA)-based residency programmes are designed to offer structure, flexibility, and a gradual increase in autonomy. While residents are expected to take an active role in their learning, little is known about how they actually experience learning and working within the EPA framework. This study explores paediatric residents' experiences of learning, working, and developing within an EPA-based training programme.
Methods: We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 11 paediatric residents from three of the seven Dutch training regions. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, anonymised, and analysed using template analysis to identify themes related to residents' learning and professional development within EPA-based training.
Results: Residents described increasing confidence and competence in the phase prior to entrustment. Some linked this development to the EPA structure, as it supported goal setting and feedback-seeking, while others attributed this development primarily to learning through clinical experience.The entrustment decision process-particularly the Clinical Competence Committee (CCC) feedback-was seen as reassuring, though residents also described discomfort with being evaluated by a group. After entrustment, residents experienced greater autonomy but noted variation in supervision practices. Some felt unsure about when to request supervision, particularly in apparently straightforward settings. Others described feeling empowered to pursue individualised learning opportunities.
Discussion: In reflecting on these findings, we drew on the concept of Self-Regulated Learning to explore how residents engaged with their training. Making these principles more explicit within EPA-based programmes may support residents in optimising their learning and strengthen their preparation for independent practice.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives on Medical Education mission is support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices.
Official journal of the The Netherlands Association of Medical Education (NVMO).
Perspectives on Medical Education is a non-profit Open Access journal with no charges for authors to submit or publish an article, and the full text of all articles is freely available immediately upon publication, thanks to the sponsorship of The Netherlands Association for Medical Education.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.
Perspectives on Medical Education positions itself at the dynamic intersection of educational research and clinical education. While other journals in the health professional education domain orient predominantly to education researchers or to clinical educators, Perspectives positions itself at the collaborative interface between these perspectives. This unique positioning reflects the journal’s mission to support and enrich collaborative scholarship between education researchers and clinical educators, and to advance new knowledge regarding clinical education practices. Reflecting this mission, the journal both welcomes original research papers arising from scholarly collaborations among clinicians, teachers and researchers and papers providing resources to develop the community’s ability to conduct such collaborative research. The journal’s audience includes researchers and practitioners: researchers who wish to explore challenging questions of health professions education and clinical teachers who wish to both advance their practice and envision for themselves a collaborative role in scholarly educational innovation. This audience of researchers, clinicians and educators is both international and interdisciplinary.
The journal has a long history. In 1982, the journal was founded by the Dutch Association for Medical Education, as a Dutch language journal (Netherlands Journal of Medical Education). As a Dutch journal it fuelled educational research and innovation in the Netherlands. It is one of the factors for the Dutch success in medical education. In 2012, it widened its scope, transforming into an international English language journal. The journal swiftly became international in all aspects: the readers, authors, reviewers and editorial board members.
The editorial board members represent the different parental disciplines in the field of medical education, e.g. clinicians, social scientists, biomedical scientists, statisticians and linguists. Several of them are leading scholars. Three of the editors are in the top ten of most cited authors in the medical education field. Two editors were awarded the Karolinska Institute Prize for Research. Presently, Erik Driessen leads the journal as Editor in Chief.
Perspectives on Medical Education is highly visible thanks to its unrestricted online access policy. It is sponsored by theThe Netherlands Association of Medical Education and offers free manuscript submission.