导航新水域:MACRA 2015如何改变医疗保险B部分医生的做法?

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mahmoud Manouchehri Amoli, Bassam Dahman
{"title":"导航新水域:MACRA 2015如何改变医疗保险B部分医生的做法?","authors":"Mahmoud Manouchehri Amoli, Bassam Dahman","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating New Waters: How Did MACRA 2015 Transform Practices Among Medicare Part B Physicians?\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Manouchehri Amoli, Bassam Dahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14631\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估参与2015年医疗保险准入和CHIP再授权法案(MACRA)的医生与未参与MACRA实施后的医生相比,是否表现出不同的计费行为和实践模式。研究设置和设计:采用准实验交错差中差设计,比较2013年至2021年参与者和非参与者在macra前后的变化。主要结局包括年度提交费用、年度医疗保险支付和费用支付比。次要结果是每位受益人的平均收费和支付、总服务和服务的受益人人数。数据来源和分析样本:本研究分析了医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医疗保险收费服务提供者使用和支付数据(2013-2021)的二手数据,提供了结果测量和控制变量;质量支付计划(QPP)经验报告(2017-2021),国家计划和提供者枚举系统,医疗保险地理差异公共使用文件。分析样本包括4924118名医生年观察(749129名独特的医生),其中50.2%参与了MACRA。主要发现:与不参加MACRA相比,参加MACRA的总提交费用每年显著增加36,677美元(95% CI: 28,918, 44,436),总医疗保险支付增加9164美元(95% CI: 7288, 11041)。然而,这些增长似乎主要是由于每位医生服务的医疗保险受益人总数大幅增加(29.77名受益人;95% CI: 20.75, 32.79),而不是通过每个受益人的支出增加,这是适度的(每个受益人的平均支付增加2.10美元;95% ci: 0.22, 3.97)。在MACRA参与者中,收费与付款比率下降了0.04个百分点(95% CI: -0.08, -0.00),表明计费效率可能有所提高。结论:MACRA参与与医疗保险B部分医生的账单和支付增加有关,主要是由于医生治疗更多的医疗保险受益人。然而,每位受益人支出的适度变化表明护理强度的变化有限。在MACRA下,需要进一步研究影响患者数量和付款人组合的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating New Waters: How Did MACRA 2015 Transform Practices Among Medicare Part B Physicians?

Objectives: To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.

Study setting and design: A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.

Data sources and analytic sample: The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.

Principal findings: MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.

Conclusions: MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信