{"title":"导航新水域:MACRA 2015如何改变医疗保险B部分医生的做法?","authors":"Mahmoud Manouchehri Amoli, Bassam Dahman","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14631"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating New Waters: How Did MACRA 2015 Transform Practices Among Medicare Part B Physicians?\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Manouchehri Amoli, Bassam Dahman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1475-6773.14631\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55065,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e14631\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14631\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating New Waters: How Did MACRA 2015 Transform Practices Among Medicare Part B Physicians?
Objectives: To assess whether physicians participating in the Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) exhibit different billing behaviors and practice patterns compared to non-participating physicians after MACRA implementation.
Study setting and design: A quasi-experimental staggered difference-in-difference design was used to compare pre-and post-MACRA changes among participants and non-participants from 2013 to 2021. Primary outcomes included annual submitted charges, annual Medicare payments, and charge-to-payment ratios. Secondary outcomes were average charges and payments per beneficiary, total services, and the number of beneficiaries served.
Data sources and analytic sample: The study analyzed secondary data from Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Fee-For-Service Provider Utilization and Payment Data (2013-2021), providing outcome measures and control variables; Quality Payment Program (QPP) Experience Reports (2017-2021), the National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, and Medicare Geographic Variation Public Use File. The analytic sample included 4,924,118 physician-year observations (749,129 unique physicians), with 50.2% participating in MACRA.
Principal findings: MACRA participation was associated with significant annual increases of $36,677 (95% CI: 28,918, 44,436) in total submitted charges and $9164 (95% CI: 7288, 11,041) in total Medicare payments compared to non-participation. However, these increases appeared primarily driven by a substantial increase in the total number of Medicare beneficiaries served per physician (29.77 beneficiaries; 95% CI: 20.75, 32.79) rather than by increases in spending per beneficiary, which were modest (average payment increase per beneficiary of $2.10; 95% CI: 0.22, 3.97). The charge-to-payment ratio decreased by 0.04 percentage points (95% CI: -0.08, -0.00) among MACRA participants, suggesting potential improvements in billing efficiency.
Conclusions: MACRA participation is associated with increased billing and payment among Medicare Part B physicians, primarily driven by physicians treating a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries. However, modest changes in per-beneficiary spending suggest limited changes in care intensity. Further research is needed to explore factors influencing patient volumes and payer mix under MACRA.
期刊介绍:
Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.