安全网提供者:卫生公平研究领域的缺失特征。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Maureen R Benjamins, Helen Margellos-Anast
{"title":"安全网提供者:卫生公平研究领域的缺失特征。","authors":"Maureen R Benjamins, Helen Margellos-Anast","doi":"10.1353/hpu.2025.a959125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Safety-net health care systems disproportionately serve the most marginalized and historically excluded groups in the U.S. Research from these systems not only focuses on those most affected by health inequities but is often strengthened by environments that are rich in direct experience, genuine community engagement, and awareness of social injustices. Despite this, research from safety-net systems is limited. Safety-net institutions face substantial structural barriers, primarily financial, that undermine their capacity to develop necessary infrastructure and compete for grants. We present a case study of a research center based in a safety-net system in Chicago to explore these challenges and potential solutions. Recommendations include the implementation of equity-focused funding approaches, research collaborations that take advantage of the expertise and community connections of safety-net providers, and strengthening the complex funding structure for safety-net hospitals. Health equity research must be driven by those most affected, and safety-net systems are well-positioned to help accomplish this.</p>","PeriodicalId":48101,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","volume":"36 2","pages":"730-747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety-Net Providers: A Missing Feature of the Health Equity Research Landscape.\",\"authors\":\"Maureen R Benjamins, Helen Margellos-Anast\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hpu.2025.a959125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Safety-net health care systems disproportionately serve the most marginalized and historically excluded groups in the U.S. Research from these systems not only focuses on those most affected by health inequities but is often strengthened by environments that are rich in direct experience, genuine community engagement, and awareness of social injustices. Despite this, research from safety-net systems is limited. Safety-net institutions face substantial structural barriers, primarily financial, that undermine their capacity to develop necessary infrastructure and compete for grants. We present a case study of a research center based in a safety-net system in Chicago to explore these challenges and potential solutions. Recommendations include the implementation of equity-focused funding approaches, research collaborations that take advantage of the expertise and community connections of safety-net providers, and strengthening the complex funding structure for safety-net hospitals. Health equity research must be driven by those most affected, and safety-net systems are well-positioned to help accomplish this.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48101,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"volume\":\"36 2\",\"pages\":\"730-747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2025.a959125\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2025.a959125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

安全网卫生保健系统不成比例地为美国最边缘化和历史上被排斥的群体提供服务。对这些系统的研究不仅关注那些受卫生不平等影响最大的群体,而且往往通过丰富的直接经验、真正的社区参与和对社会不公正的认识而得到加强。尽管如此,安全网系统的研究是有限的。安全网机构面临着巨大的结构性障碍,主要是财政障碍,这削弱了它们发展必要基础设施和竞争赠款的能力。本文以芝加哥一个基于社会保障体系的研究中心为例,探讨这些挑战和潜在的解决方案。建议包括实施以公平为重点的供资方法,开展研究合作,利用安全网提供者的专业知识和社区联系,以及加强安全网医院的复杂供资结构。卫生公平研究必须由受影响最严重的人推动,而安全网系统完全有能力帮助实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety-Net Providers: A Missing Feature of the Health Equity Research Landscape.

Safety-net health care systems disproportionately serve the most marginalized and historically excluded groups in the U.S. Research from these systems not only focuses on those most affected by health inequities but is often strengthened by environments that are rich in direct experience, genuine community engagement, and awareness of social injustices. Despite this, research from safety-net systems is limited. Safety-net institutions face substantial structural barriers, primarily financial, that undermine their capacity to develop necessary infrastructure and compete for grants. We present a case study of a research center based in a safety-net system in Chicago to explore these challenges and potential solutions. Recommendations include the implementation of equity-focused funding approaches, research collaborations that take advantage of the expertise and community connections of safety-net providers, and strengthening the complex funding structure for safety-net hospitals. Health equity research must be driven by those most affected, and safety-net systems are well-positioned to help accomplish this.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: The journal has as its goal the dissemination of information on the health of, and health care for, low income and other medically underserved communities to health care practitioners, policy makers, and community leaders who are in a position to effect meaningful change. Issues dealt with include access to, quality of, and cost of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信