Q Wen, Y Wang, H Ren, X Chen, J Zheng, L Ge, Y Zhao
{"title":"初生磨牙的根解剖和根管结构:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Q Wen, Y Wang, H Ren, X Chen, J Zheng, L Ge, Y Zhao","doi":"10.1007/s40368-025-01011-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Precise knowledge of root and canal morphology in primary teeth is critical for endodontic success, yet existing studies are fragmented and lack synthesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses this gap by investigating the distribution of root numbers, canal configurations, and root lengths in human primary molars, while exploring possible influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to September 2023. Retrospective studies using patients' cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data or cross-sectional studies utilizing computed tomography (CT) or CBCT on extracted primary molars reporting on the root canal morphology of primary molars were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the proportions of root and canal numbers and calculate the mean values of root lengths. Forest plots were used to present the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified 799 records. After screening abstracts and full texts, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies had a high risk of bias, 23 a moderate risk, and 5 a low risk. The meta-analysis revealed that primary maxillary first molars were predominantly three-rooted (80.2%) with three canals (96.9%), while primary maxillary second molars were primarily three-rooted (89.7%) with three or four canals (84.4% and 14.7%, respectively). Primary mandibular first and second molars typically had two roots with M2D2 being the most common canal type, though the former showed high variability in canal configurations. Root lengths were also analyzed. Subgroup analysis indicated that heterogeneity may be influenced by country and data source, while no significant differences were associated with imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary maxillary molars are predominantly three-rooted with three canals, while primary mandibular molars typically had two roots with four canals. Variations in root anatomy and canal configuration should be considered during endodontic treatment of primary teeth. High heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies limit the current evidence, highlighting the need for future research to address contributing factors to heterogeneity and to develop standardized methods for assessing root and canal morphology in the primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023414536 on 2023.04.</p>","PeriodicalId":47603,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Root anatomy and canal configuration of primary molars: a systemic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Q Wen, Y Wang, H Ren, X Chen, J Zheng, L Ge, Y Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40368-025-01011-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Precise knowledge of root and canal morphology in primary teeth is critical for endodontic success, yet existing studies are fragmented and lack synthesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses this gap by investigating the distribution of root numbers, canal configurations, and root lengths in human primary molars, while exploring possible influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A literature search was conducted through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to September 2023. Retrospective studies using patients' cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data or cross-sectional studies utilizing computed tomography (CT) or CBCT on extracted primary molars reporting on the root canal morphology of primary molars were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the proportions of root and canal numbers and calculate the mean values of root lengths. Forest plots were used to present the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy identified 799 records. After screening abstracts and full texts, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies had a high risk of bias, 23 a moderate risk, and 5 a low risk. The meta-analysis revealed that primary maxillary first molars were predominantly three-rooted (80.2%) with three canals (96.9%), while primary maxillary second molars were primarily three-rooted (89.7%) with three or four canals (84.4% and 14.7%, respectively). Primary mandibular first and second molars typically had two roots with M2D2 being the most common canal type, though the former showed high variability in canal configurations. Root lengths were also analyzed. Subgroup analysis indicated that heterogeneity may be influenced by country and data source, while no significant differences were associated with imaging techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary maxillary molars are predominantly three-rooted with three canals, while primary mandibular molars typically had two roots with four canals. Variations in root anatomy and canal configuration should be considered during endodontic treatment of primary teeth. High heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies limit the current evidence, highlighting the need for future research to address contributing factors to heterogeneity and to develop standardized methods for assessing root and canal morphology in the primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023414536 on 2023.04.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47603,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01011-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-025-01011-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:准确了解乳牙根管形态对牙髓治疗的成功至关重要,但现有研究零散且缺乏综合性。本系统综述和荟萃分析通过调查人类第一磨牙的根数分布、根管结构和根长度来解决这一差距,同时探索可能的影响因素。方法:截至2023年9月,通过PubMed、ScienceDirect、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和中国知网进行文献检索。使用患者锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)数据的回顾性研究或使用计算机断层扫描(CT)或CBCT对拔出的初生磨牙进行横断面研究,报告初生磨牙的根管形态。采用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。进行荟萃分析以估计根和根管数量的比例,并计算根长度的平均值。研究结果采用了森林样地。结果:搜索策略确定了799条记录。在筛选摘要和全文后,有30项研究符合纳入标准。其中,2项研究有高偏倚风险,23项为中等偏倚风险,5项为低偏倚风险。meta分析显示上颌第一磨牙以三根为主(80.2%),三根管为主(96.9%),而上颌第二磨牙以三根为主(89.7%),三根管为主(84.4%),四根管为主(14.7%)。下颌第一磨牙和第二磨牙通常有两个根,其中M2D2是最常见的根管类型,尽管前者在根管构型上表现出很高的可变性。根长度也进行了分析。亚组分析表明,异质性可能受到国家和数据来源的影响,而与成像技术没有显著差异。结论:上颌初生磨牙以三根三管为主,下颌骨初生磨牙以两根四管为主。在对乳牙进行根管治疗时,应考虑到牙根解剖结构和根管结构的变化。高异质性和方法上的不一致性限制了现有的证据,强调需要未来的研究来解决异质性的影响因素,并制定标准化的方法来评估乳牙的根管形态。试用注册:普洛斯彼罗注册号。CRD42023414536 on 2023.04。
Root anatomy and canal configuration of primary molars: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Purpose: Precise knowledge of root and canal morphology in primary teeth is critical for endodontic success, yet existing studies are fragmented and lack synthesis. This systematic review and meta-analysis addresses this gap by investigating the distribution of root numbers, canal configurations, and root lengths in human primary molars, while exploring possible influencing factors.
Methods: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to September 2023. Retrospective studies using patients' cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) data or cross-sectional studies utilizing computed tomography (CT) or CBCT on extracted primary molars reporting on the root canal morphology of primary molars were included. Study quality was assessed using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed to estimate the proportions of root and canal numbers and calculate the mean values of root lengths. Forest plots were used to present the results.
Results: The search strategy identified 799 records. After screening abstracts and full texts, 30 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 2 studies had a high risk of bias, 23 a moderate risk, and 5 a low risk. The meta-analysis revealed that primary maxillary first molars were predominantly three-rooted (80.2%) with three canals (96.9%), while primary maxillary second molars were primarily three-rooted (89.7%) with three or four canals (84.4% and 14.7%, respectively). Primary mandibular first and second molars typically had two roots with M2D2 being the most common canal type, though the former showed high variability in canal configurations. Root lengths were also analyzed. Subgroup analysis indicated that heterogeneity may be influenced by country and data source, while no significant differences were associated with imaging techniques.
Conclusions: Primary maxillary molars are predominantly three-rooted with three canals, while primary mandibular molars typically had two roots with four canals. Variations in root anatomy and canal configuration should be considered during endodontic treatment of primary teeth. High heterogeneity and methodological inconsistencies limit the current evidence, highlighting the need for future research to address contributing factors to heterogeneity and to develop standardized methods for assessing root and canal morphology in the primary teeth.
Trial registration: PROSPERO registration no. CRD42023414536 on 2023.04.
期刊介绍:
The aim and scope of European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry (EAPD) is to promote research in all aspects of dentistry for children, including interceptive orthodontics and studies on children and young adults with special needs. The EAPD focuses on the publication and critical evaluation of clinical and basic science research related to children. The EAPD will consider clinical case series reports, followed by the relevant literature review, only where there are new and important findings of interest to Paediatric Dentistry and where details of techniques or treatment carried out and the success of such approaches are given.