意大利纳他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本最小化分析和预算影响分析。

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S501716
Luca Prosperini, Lorenzo Pradelli, Laura Santoni, Daria Perini, Salvatore Cottone, Marco Vercellino
{"title":"意大利纳他珠单抗治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本最小化分析和预算影响分析。","authors":"Luca Prosperini, Lorenzo Pradelli, Laura Santoni, Daria Perini, Salvatore Cottone, Marco Vercellino","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S501716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two analyses, a cost-minimization and a budget impact, were conducted to estimate the economic and financial impact of subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) natalizumab in terms of administration times and costs in the Italian setting from the perspective of multiple sclerosis (MS) center, patient, and society.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Cost minimization analysis (CMA) adopted a Markov model with three different states, and it is based on the results of REFINE study and its post-hoc analysis, which evaluated and demonstrated the non-inferiority of natalizumab SC vs IV formulation. The economic inputs came mainly from EASIER study, that estimated the administration time, resource consumption, and costs of natalizumab SC vs IV. A lifetime horizon was considered. Budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted with a cost calculator approach and compared a base scenario (without SC natalizumab) with an alternative scenario (with SC natalizumab). The inputs were shared with the CMA and a 3-year time horizon was considered. A progressive increase in the number of patients treated with natalizumab SC was estimated from the 1st to the 2nd to the 3rd year after reimbursement in Italy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMA estimated that savings due to the use of SC instead of IV natalizumab would be €2,824, €1,137, and €9,170 per patient from the perspectives of MS center, patient, and society, respectively, thus depicting a weak dominance (lower costs and non-inferiority efficacy). BIA estimated that the savings were approximately 3.2 million euros from the perspective of MS centers and around 10.3 million euros from the perspective of society in the first 3 years following reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering natalizumab subcutaneously rather than intravenously to treatment-eligible patients would result in administration time and cost savings thus determining a favorable impact for the MS center, the patient and the society.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"315-333"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-Minimization Analysis and Budget Impact Analysis About Subcutaneous Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Luca Prosperini, Lorenzo Pradelli, Laura Santoni, Daria Perini, Salvatore Cottone, Marco Vercellino\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/CEOR.S501716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Two analyses, a cost-minimization and a budget impact, were conducted to estimate the economic and financial impact of subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) natalizumab in terms of administration times and costs in the Italian setting from the perspective of multiple sclerosis (MS) center, patient, and society.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Cost minimization analysis (CMA) adopted a Markov model with three different states, and it is based on the results of REFINE study and its post-hoc analysis, which evaluated and demonstrated the non-inferiority of natalizumab SC vs IV formulation. The economic inputs came mainly from EASIER study, that estimated the administration time, resource consumption, and costs of natalizumab SC vs IV. A lifetime horizon was considered. Budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted with a cost calculator approach and compared a base scenario (without SC natalizumab) with an alternative scenario (with SC natalizumab). The inputs were shared with the CMA and a 3-year time horizon was considered. A progressive increase in the number of patients treated with natalizumab SC was estimated from the 1st to the 2nd to the 3rd year after reimbursement in Italy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CMA estimated that savings due to the use of SC instead of IV natalizumab would be €2,824, €1,137, and €9,170 per patient from the perspectives of MS center, patient, and society, respectively, thus depicting a weak dominance (lower costs and non-inferiority efficacy). BIA estimated that the savings were approximately 3.2 million euros from the perspective of MS centers and around 10.3 million euros from the perspective of society in the first 3 years following reimbursement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Administering natalizumab subcutaneously rather than intravenously to treatment-eligible patients would result in administration time and cost savings thus determining a favorable impact for the MS center, the patient and the society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"315-333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11999704/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S501716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S501716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:从意大利多发性硬化症(MS)中心、患者和社会的角度,进行了成本最小化和预算影响两项分析,以评估皮下(SC)与静脉(IV) natalizumab在给药时间和成本方面的经济和财务影响。患者和方法:成本最小化分析(CMA)采用具有三种不同状态的马尔可夫模型,该模型基于REFINE研究的结果及其事后分析,该研究评估并证明了natalizumab SC与IV制剂的非劣效性。经济投入主要来自easy研究,该研究估计了natalizumab SC与IV的管理时间、资源消耗和成本。考虑了生命周期。预算影响分析(BIA)采用成本计算器方法进行,并将基本方案(不使用SC natalizumab)与替代方案(使用SC natalizumab)进行比较。输入与CMA共享,并考虑了3年的时间范围。在意大利,估计从报销后的第1年到第2年到第3年,接受natalizumab SC治疗的患者数量逐渐增加。结果:CMA估计,从MS中心、患者和社会的角度来看,SC替代IV natalizumab的节省分别为每位患者2,824欧元、1,137欧元和9,170欧元,因此呈现弱优势(较低的成本和非劣效性)。BIA估计,在报销后的前三年,从MS中心的角度来看,节省了大约320万欧元,从社会的角度来看,节省了大约1030万欧元。结论:对符合治疗条件的患者皮下注射natalizumab比静脉注射natalizumab可节省给药时间和成本,从而对MS中心、患者和社会产生有利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cost-Minimization Analysis and Budget Impact Analysis About Subcutaneous Natalizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Italy.

Purpose: Two analyses, a cost-minimization and a budget impact, were conducted to estimate the economic and financial impact of subcutaneous (SC) vs intravenous (IV) natalizumab in terms of administration times and costs in the Italian setting from the perspective of multiple sclerosis (MS) center, patient, and society.

Patients and methods: Cost minimization analysis (CMA) adopted a Markov model with three different states, and it is based on the results of REFINE study and its post-hoc analysis, which evaluated and demonstrated the non-inferiority of natalizumab SC vs IV formulation. The economic inputs came mainly from EASIER study, that estimated the administration time, resource consumption, and costs of natalizumab SC vs IV. A lifetime horizon was considered. Budget impact analysis (BIA) was conducted with a cost calculator approach and compared a base scenario (without SC natalizumab) with an alternative scenario (with SC natalizumab). The inputs were shared with the CMA and a 3-year time horizon was considered. A progressive increase in the number of patients treated with natalizumab SC was estimated from the 1st to the 2nd to the 3rd year after reimbursement in Italy.

Results: CMA estimated that savings due to the use of SC instead of IV natalizumab would be €2,824, €1,137, and €9,170 per patient from the perspectives of MS center, patient, and society, respectively, thus depicting a weak dominance (lower costs and non-inferiority efficacy). BIA estimated that the savings were approximately 3.2 million euros from the perspective of MS centers and around 10.3 million euros from the perspective of society in the first 3 years following reimbursement.

Conclusion: Administering natalizumab subcutaneously rather than intravenously to treatment-eligible patients would result in administration time and cost savings thus determining a favorable impact for the MS center, the patient and the society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信