Mateus S Dias, Sandra M S F Freitas, Paulo B de Freitas
{"title":"多关节协同在足高度稳定跨越不同的运行速度:一个不受控制的流形分析。","authors":"Mateus S Dias, Sandra M S F Freitas, Paulo B de Freitas","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2025.2480143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The uncontrolled manifold (UCM) framework was employed to investigate the presence of a multi-joint synergy stabilizing foot height during the swing phase of treadmill running and its potential dependence on running speed. Experienced runners (<i>N</i> = 28; aged 22-51) ran on an instrumented treadmill set at three different speeds: 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 m/s. Kinematic data were utilized to calculate UCM outcomes: variances in the joint space that had no effect (<i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub>) and those that influenced (<i>V</i><sub><i>ORT</i></sub>) foot height, and the synergy index (Δ<i>V</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub>, the normalized difference between <i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub> and <i>V</i><sub><i>ORT</i></sub>). They were computed for each normalized frame (1-100%) of the swing phase and averaged in 10% intervals. <i>ΔV</i><sub>Z</sub> was greater than zero and varied across the swing phase, being lowest at 51-60% and highest at 81-100%. <i>ΔV</i><sub>Z</sub> was the lowest at the slowest speed in the second half of the swing phase, because of a low <i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub>. The findings indicate that the CNS organizes a multi-joint synergy to stabilize foot height, with the strongest synergy at the end of the swing phase to ensure safe foot placement and landing. Faster running speeds enhance this synergy, allowing greater adaptability to perturbations, while slower speeds lead to a more cautious approach, reducing overall variance.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Joint Synergy in Foot Height Stabilization Across Different Running Speeds: An Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Mateus S Dias, Sandra M S F Freitas, Paulo B de Freitas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02701367.2025.2480143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The uncontrolled manifold (UCM) framework was employed to investigate the presence of a multi-joint synergy stabilizing foot height during the swing phase of treadmill running and its potential dependence on running speed. Experienced runners (<i>N</i> = 28; aged 22-51) ran on an instrumented treadmill set at three different speeds: 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 m/s. Kinematic data were utilized to calculate UCM outcomes: variances in the joint space that had no effect (<i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub>) and those that influenced (<i>V</i><sub><i>ORT</i></sub>) foot height, and the synergy index (Δ<i>V</i><sub><i>Z</i></sub>, the normalized difference between <i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub> and <i>V</i><sub><i>ORT</i></sub>). They were computed for each normalized frame (1-100%) of the swing phase and averaged in 10% intervals. <i>ΔV</i><sub>Z</sub> was greater than zero and varied across the swing phase, being lowest at 51-60% and highest at 81-100%. <i>ΔV</i><sub>Z</sub> was the lowest at the slowest speed in the second half of the swing phase, because of a low <i>V</i><sub><i>UCM</i></sub>. The findings indicate that the CNS organizes a multi-joint synergy to stabilize foot height, with the strongest synergy at the end of the swing phase to ensure safe foot placement and landing. Faster running speeds enhance this synergy, allowing greater adaptability to perturbations, while slower speeds lead to a more cautious approach, reducing overall variance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94191,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research quarterly for exercise and sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2480143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2025.2480143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Multi-Joint Synergy in Foot Height Stabilization Across Different Running Speeds: An Uncontrolled Manifold Analysis.
The uncontrolled manifold (UCM) framework was employed to investigate the presence of a multi-joint synergy stabilizing foot height during the swing phase of treadmill running and its potential dependence on running speed. Experienced runners (N = 28; aged 22-51) ran on an instrumented treadmill set at three different speeds: 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5 m/s. Kinematic data were utilized to calculate UCM outcomes: variances in the joint space that had no effect (VUCM) and those that influenced (VORT) foot height, and the synergy index (ΔVZ, the normalized difference between VUCM and VORT). They were computed for each normalized frame (1-100%) of the swing phase and averaged in 10% intervals. ΔVZ was greater than zero and varied across the swing phase, being lowest at 51-60% and highest at 81-100%. ΔVZ was the lowest at the slowest speed in the second half of the swing phase, because of a low VUCM. The findings indicate that the CNS organizes a multi-joint synergy to stabilize foot height, with the strongest synergy at the end of the swing phase to ensure safe foot placement and landing. Faster running speeds enhance this synergy, allowing greater adaptability to perturbations, while slower speeds lead to a more cautious approach, reducing overall variance.