Audrey Astruc, Valérie Seegers, Frederic Dumont, Cécile Loaec, Emilie Thibaudeau, Charlotte Bourgin, Romuald Wernert, Noémie Body, Valeria De Franco
{"title":"在腹腔镜评估腹膜转移的腹膜癌指数评分时,观察者之间是否可以达到一致性?一项初步研究。","authors":"Audrey Astruc, Valérie Seegers, Frederic Dumont, Cécile Loaec, Emilie Thibaudeau, Charlotte Bourgin, Romuald Wernert, Noémie Body, Valeria De Franco","doi":"10.1515/pp-2024-0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main prognostic factor for peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the complete resection of the disease during cytoreductive surgery. Accurate patient selection is therefore essential for determining eligibility for this type of surgery. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is a widely used tool for assessing the extent of carcinomatosis. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of PCI assessments via laparoscopy and identify factors influencing this reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2020 and November 2022, 25 laparoscopic PCI assessment videos were reviewed by six surgeons from two centers. The total PCI score, regional PCI scores, and the number of visualized PCI areas were recorded. Inter-observer concordance was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PCI score was 12 out of 39 (range 0-39), and the median number of visualized PCI regions was 10 out of 13 (range 1-13). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total PCI score was 0.846 (95 % CI 0.738, 0.927). A history of abdominal surgery significantly impacted PCI assessment reproducibility (p=0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a high inter-observer concordance in laparoscopic PCI assessments. Previous abdominal surgery negatively affected reproducibility, highlighting a challenge in evaluating the PCI in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20231,"journal":{"name":"Pleura and Peritoneum","volume":"10 1","pages":"19-23"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can inter-observer consistency be achieved in the laparoscopic assessment of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index score in peritoneal metastasis? A pilot study.\",\"authors\":\"Audrey Astruc, Valérie Seegers, Frederic Dumont, Cécile Loaec, Emilie Thibaudeau, Charlotte Bourgin, Romuald Wernert, Noémie Body, Valeria De Franco\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/pp-2024-0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The main prognostic factor for peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the complete resection of the disease during cytoreductive surgery. Accurate patient selection is therefore essential for determining eligibility for this type of surgery. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is a widely used tool for assessing the extent of carcinomatosis. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of PCI assessments via laparoscopy and identify factors influencing this reproducibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between November 2020 and November 2022, 25 laparoscopic PCI assessment videos were reviewed by six surgeons from two centers. The total PCI score, regional PCI scores, and the number of visualized PCI areas were recorded. Inter-observer concordance was analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median PCI score was 12 out of 39 (range 0-39), and the median number of visualized PCI regions was 10 out of 13 (range 1-13). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total PCI score was 0.846 (95 % CI 0.738, 0.927). A history of abdominal surgery significantly impacted PCI assessment reproducibility (p=0.029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found a high inter-observer concordance in laparoscopic PCI assessments. Previous abdominal surgery negatively affected reproducibility, highlighting a challenge in evaluating the PCI in these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20231,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"19-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pleura and Peritoneum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pleura and Peritoneum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/pp-2024-0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:腹膜转移(PM)的主要预后因素是在细胞减缩手术中完全切除疾病。因此,准确的患者选择对于确定此类手术的资格至关重要。腹膜癌指数(PCI)是一种广泛使用的评估癌变程度的工具。本研究旨在评估腹腔镜下PCI评估的观察者间的可重复性,并确定影响这种可重复性的因素。方法:在2020年11月至2022年11月期间,对来自两个中心的6名外科医生的25个腹腔镜PCI评估视频进行了回顾。记录总PCI评分、区域PCI评分、PCI可视化区域数。分析观察者间的一致性。结果:PCI评分中位数为12 / 39(范围0-39),PCI显像区域中位数为10 / 13(范围1-13)。PCI总评分的类内相关系数(ICC)为0.846(95 % CI 0.738, 0.927)。腹部手术史显著影响PCI评估的再现性(p=0.029)。结论:本研究发现在腹腔镜PCI评估中观察者间的高度一致性。先前的腹部手术对重复性有负面影响,这突出了评估这些患者的PCI的挑战。
Can inter-observer consistency be achieved in the laparoscopic assessment of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index score in peritoneal metastasis? A pilot study.
Objectives: The main prognostic factor for peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the complete resection of the disease during cytoreductive surgery. Accurate patient selection is therefore essential for determining eligibility for this type of surgery. The peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) is a widely used tool for assessing the extent of carcinomatosis. This study aimed to evaluate the inter-observer reproducibility of PCI assessments via laparoscopy and identify factors influencing this reproducibility.
Methods: Between November 2020 and November 2022, 25 laparoscopic PCI assessment videos were reviewed by six surgeons from two centers. The total PCI score, regional PCI scores, and the number of visualized PCI areas were recorded. Inter-observer concordance was analyzed.
Results: The median PCI score was 12 out of 39 (range 0-39), and the median number of visualized PCI regions was 10 out of 13 (range 1-13). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for the total PCI score was 0.846 (95 % CI 0.738, 0.927). A history of abdominal surgery significantly impacted PCI assessment reproducibility (p=0.029).
Conclusions: This study found a high inter-observer concordance in laparoscopic PCI assessments. Previous abdominal surgery negatively affected reproducibility, highlighting a challenge in evaluating the PCI in these patients.