中国智慧养老机构“技术与服务”协同评价体系

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
DIGITAL HEALTH Pub Date : 2025-04-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20552076251326681
Xiaoyun Liu, Ka-Yin Chau, Xiaoxiao Liu, Yan Wan
{"title":"中国智慧养老机构“技术与服务”协同评价体系","authors":"Xiaoyun Liu, Ka-Yin Chau, Xiaoxiao Liu, Yan Wan","doi":"10.1177/20552076251326681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smart elderly care faces numerous challenges while aligning with the national strategy of promoting the silver economy. Chief among these challenges is the inconsistent quality of services offered by smart elderly care institutions, which significantly impedes the industry's further development. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for assessing the quality of smart elderly care services, refine the evaluation index system for these services, and explore strategies to enhance their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Structure-Process-Outcome model, this paper has developed an integrated theoretical framework and employed a combination of modified-Delphi method and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory - Analytic Network Process to establish and assign weights to the service quality evaluation system for smart elderly care institutions in China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study develops a \"Technology + Service\" synergistic theoretical framework and an index system comprising four first-tier indicators, 12 second-tier indicators, and 54 third-tier indicators. The most significant indicators identified are service resources, smart elderly care infrastructure, staffing, service empathy, the rate of health file creation, 3S device coverage rate, and average living space per bed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results reveal that service resources, especially the information technology infrastructure and smart equipment are the most crucial aspects of smart elderly care institutions. Additionally, institutions should focus on improving the expertise of their staff and providing psychological care for elderly adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":51333,"journal":{"name":"DIGITAL HEALTH","volume":"11 ","pages":"20552076251326681"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033596/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Synergistic evaluation system of \\\"technology and service\\\" in smart elderly care institutions in China.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyun Liu, Ka-Yin Chau, Xiaoxiao Liu, Yan Wan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20552076251326681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Smart elderly care faces numerous challenges while aligning with the national strategy of promoting the silver economy. Chief among these challenges is the inconsistent quality of services offered by smart elderly care institutions, which significantly impedes the industry's further development. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for assessing the quality of smart elderly care services, refine the evaluation index system for these services, and explore strategies to enhance their quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on the Structure-Process-Outcome model, this paper has developed an integrated theoretical framework and employed a combination of modified-Delphi method and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory - Analytic Network Process to establish and assign weights to the service quality evaluation system for smart elderly care institutions in China.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study develops a \\\"Technology + Service\\\" synergistic theoretical framework and an index system comprising four first-tier indicators, 12 second-tier indicators, and 54 third-tier indicators. The most significant indicators identified are service resources, smart elderly care infrastructure, staffing, service empathy, the rate of health file creation, 3S device coverage rate, and average living space per bed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results reveal that service resources, especially the information technology infrastructure and smart equipment are the most crucial aspects of smart elderly care institutions. Additionally, institutions should focus on improving the expertise of their staff and providing psychological care for elderly adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"20552076251326681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033596/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DIGITAL HEALTH\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251326681\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DIGITAL HEALTH","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251326681","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智慧养老在契合国家发展银发经济战略的同时,面临诸多挑战。在这些挑战中,最主要的是智能养老机构提供的服务质量不稳定,这极大地阻碍了行业的进一步发展。因此,本文旨在构建智慧养老服务质量评估的理论框架,完善智慧养老服务的评价指标体系,探索提升智慧养老服务质量的策略。方法:以结构-过程-结果模型为基础,构建综合理论框架,采用修正德尔菲法和决策试验与评价实验室-分析网络过程相结合的方法,建立中国智慧养老机构服务质量评价体系并赋予权重。结果:构建了“技术+服务”协同发展的理论框架和由4个一级指标、12个二级指标、54个三级指标组成的指标体系。最重要的指标是服务资源、智慧养老基础设施、人员配备、服务移情、健康档案创建率、3S设备覆盖率和平均床位居住空间。结论:服务资源,尤其是信息技术基础设施和智能设备是智慧养老机构最关键的方面。此外,机构应注重提高其工作人员的专业知识,并为老年人提供心理护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Synergistic evaluation system of "technology and service" in smart elderly care institutions in China.

Background: Smart elderly care faces numerous challenges while aligning with the national strategy of promoting the silver economy. Chief among these challenges is the inconsistent quality of services offered by smart elderly care institutions, which significantly impedes the industry's further development. Therefore, the objective of this paper is to develop a theoretical framework for assessing the quality of smart elderly care services, refine the evaluation index system for these services, and explore strategies to enhance their quality.

Methods: Based on the Structure-Process-Outcome model, this paper has developed an integrated theoretical framework and employed a combination of modified-Delphi method and Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory - Analytic Network Process to establish and assign weights to the service quality evaluation system for smart elderly care institutions in China.

Results: This study develops a "Technology + Service" synergistic theoretical framework and an index system comprising four first-tier indicators, 12 second-tier indicators, and 54 third-tier indicators. The most significant indicators identified are service resources, smart elderly care infrastructure, staffing, service empathy, the rate of health file creation, 3S device coverage rate, and average living space per bed.

Conclusion: The results reveal that service resources, especially the information technology infrastructure and smart equipment are the most crucial aspects of smart elderly care institutions. Additionally, institutions should focus on improving the expertise of their staff and providing psychological care for elderly adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DIGITAL HEALTH
DIGITAL HEALTH Multiple-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
302
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信