运动评估作为初始前交叉韧带损伤的预测因素:一个严格评估的话题。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Destinee Johnson, Rebecca Maldonado, Erin Lally
{"title":"运动评估作为初始前交叉韧带损伤的预测因素:一个严格评估的话题。","authors":"Destinee Johnson, Rebecca Maldonado, Erin Lally","doi":"10.1123/jsr.2024-0362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk may increase when certain movements are noted during landings. Initial ACL injury produces poor long-term outcomes for patients. Movement assessments may help predict risk of initial ACL injuries.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>Are movement assessments predictive of initial ACL injuries in college/high school athletes?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Some movement assessments did not predict ACL injury. However, the functional movement screen composite score of 14 or less and landing error scoring system scores of 5 or greater were found to be associated with an increased risk of an ACL injury. Knee valgus angles of ≥6.5 cm were associated with future knee injury but only had fair predictive validity.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>There are conflicting results on whether movement assessments can accurately predict primary ACL injuries. However, clinicians can consider the use of the functional movement screen composite score (14 or less) and the landing error scoring system score (5 or greater) as both may predict a future ACL injury. More research is needed to uncover movement assessments that better predict ACL injury.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>A grade B recommendation can be given that movement assessments may be used for screening for initial ACL injury.</p>","PeriodicalId":50041,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Movement Assessments as Predictors for Initial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Critically Appraised Topic.\",\"authors\":\"Destinee Johnson, Rebecca Maldonado, Erin Lally\",\"doi\":\"10.1123/jsr.2024-0362\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Clinical scenario: </strong>Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk may increase when certain movements are noted during landings. Initial ACL injury produces poor long-term outcomes for patients. Movement assessments may help predict risk of initial ACL injuries.</p><p><strong>Clinical question: </strong>Are movement assessments predictive of initial ACL injuries in college/high school athletes?</p><p><strong>Summary of key findings: </strong>Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Some movement assessments did not predict ACL injury. However, the functional movement screen composite score of 14 or less and landing error scoring system scores of 5 or greater were found to be associated with an increased risk of an ACL injury. Knee valgus angles of ≥6.5 cm were associated with future knee injury but only had fair predictive validity.</p><p><strong>Clinical bottom line: </strong>There are conflicting results on whether movement assessments can accurately predict primary ACL injuries. However, clinicians can consider the use of the functional movement screen composite score (14 or less) and the landing error scoring system score (5 or greater) as both may predict a future ACL injury. More research is needed to uncover movement assessments that better predict ACL injury.</p><p><strong>Strength of recommendation: </strong>A grade B recommendation can be given that movement assessments may be used for screening for initial ACL injury.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0362\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sport Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2024-0362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

临床情况:着陆时注意到某些动作时,前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤的风险可能会增加。最初的前交叉韧带损伤对患者的长期预后很差。运动评估可以帮助预测初始前交叉韧带损伤的风险。临床问题:运动评估能预测大学/高中运动员的初始ACL损伤吗?主要发现总结:6篇文章符合纳入标准。一些运动评估不能预测前交叉韧带损伤。然而,功能性运动屏幕综合评分为14分或更低,着陆错误评分系统评分为5分或更高,与ACL损伤的风险增加有关。膝外翻角≥6.5 cm与未来的膝关节损伤有关,但只有一般的预测效度。临床结论:关于运动评估是否能准确预测原发性ACL损伤,存在相互矛盾的结果。然而,临床医生可以考虑使用功能运动屏幕综合评分(14分或更低)和着陆错误评分系统评分(5分或更高),因为两者都可以预测未来的ACL损伤。需要更多的研究来揭示更好地预测前交叉韧带损伤的运动评估。推荐强度:B级推荐,运动评估可用于筛选初始ACL损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Movement Assessments as Predictors for Initial Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: A Critically Appraised Topic.

Clinical scenario: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk may increase when certain movements are noted during landings. Initial ACL injury produces poor long-term outcomes for patients. Movement assessments may help predict risk of initial ACL injuries.

Clinical question: Are movement assessments predictive of initial ACL injuries in college/high school athletes?

Summary of key findings: Six articles met the inclusion criteria. Some movement assessments did not predict ACL injury. However, the functional movement screen composite score of 14 or less and landing error scoring system scores of 5 or greater were found to be associated with an increased risk of an ACL injury. Knee valgus angles of ≥6.5 cm were associated with future knee injury but only had fair predictive validity.

Clinical bottom line: There are conflicting results on whether movement assessments can accurately predict primary ACL injuries. However, clinicians can consider the use of the functional movement screen composite score (14 or less) and the landing error scoring system score (5 or greater) as both may predict a future ACL injury. More research is needed to uncover movement assessments that better predict ACL injury.

Strength of recommendation: A grade B recommendation can be given that movement assessments may be used for screening for initial ACL injury.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
143
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sport Rehabilitation (JSR) is your source for the latest peer-reviewed research in the field of sport rehabilitation. All members of the sports-medicine team will benefit from the wealth of important information in each issue. JSR is completely devoted to the rehabilitation of sport and exercise injuries, regardless of the age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status of the participant. JSR publishes peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews/meta-analyses, critically appraised topics (CATs), case studies/series, and technical reports that directly affect the management and rehabilitation of injuries incurred during sport-related activities, irrespective of the individual’s age, gender, sport ability, level of fitness, or health status. The journal is intended to provide an international, multidisciplinary forum to serve the needs of all members of the sports medicine team, including athletic trainers/therapists, sport physical therapists/physiotherapists, sports medicine physicians, and other health care and medical professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信