综合证据方法在药物开发中的价值评估。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Joseph A DiMasi, Melvin Skip Olson, Zachary Smith, Kenneth A Getz, Gorana Capkun
{"title":"综合证据方法在药物开发中的价值评估。","authors":"Joseph A DiMasi, Melvin Skip Olson, Zachary Smith, Kenneth A Getz, Gorana Capkun","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00778-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) by the pharmaceutical industry has expanded in recent years with the aim of optimizing healthcare and patient outcomes. The evidence base of IEPs goes beyond traditional randomized controlled trials to provide holistic evidence suitable for all stakeholders and allows for consideration of different packages in different regions. However, this approach to drug development is not systematically adopted by all sponsors because of perceived uncertainty in its investment value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduce the concept of value drivers to which we apply an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for drug development and commercialization. The approach is outlined for two, typical, hypothetical lifecycle management IEPs. The measure of IEP value is defined as the increment in eNPV that occurs when IE programs are employed in comparison to when they are not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found substantial value for IEPs. One example incorporated a plan to conduct an observational study that could be used as a basis for approval in lieu of a classical phase II trial for a supplemental indication. In the other example, increased adoption of the new treatment leads to a highly positive increment in eNPV based on the critical evidence generated in a phase IIIb study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of value drivers and eNPV-based value models when planning for IEPs can provide objective guidance for project teams. The value can be estimated through formal economic analysis that considers planned timelines, R&D costs, estimates of the likelihood of regulatory approval, patient access and clinical adoption if development is successful.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":"808-816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A DiMasi, Melvin Skip Olson, Zachary Smith, Kenneth A Getz, Gorana Capkun\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43441-025-00778-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) by the pharmaceutical industry has expanded in recent years with the aim of optimizing healthcare and patient outcomes. The evidence base of IEPs goes beyond traditional randomized controlled trials to provide holistic evidence suitable for all stakeholders and allows for consideration of different packages in different regions. However, this approach to drug development is not systematically adopted by all sponsors because of perceived uncertainty in its investment value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We introduce the concept of value drivers to which we apply an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for drug development and commercialization. The approach is outlined for two, typical, hypothetical lifecycle management IEPs. The measure of IEP value is defined as the increment in eNPV that occurs when IE programs are employed in comparison to when they are not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found substantial value for IEPs. One example incorporated a plan to conduct an observational study that could be used as a basis for approval in lieu of a classical phase II trial for a supplemental indication. In the other example, increased adoption of the new treatment leads to a highly positive increment in eNPV based on the critical evidence generated in a phase IIIb study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Use of value drivers and eNPV-based value models when planning for IEPs can provide objective guidance for project teams. The value can be estimated through formal economic analysis that considers planned timelines, R&D costs, estimates of the likelihood of regulatory approval, patient access and clinical adoption if development is successful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23084,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"808-816\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12181097/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00778-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00778-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,制药行业使用综合证据计划(IEPs)的目的是优化医疗保健和患者结果。iep的证据基础超越了传统的随机对照试验,提供了适合所有利益攸关方的整体证据,并允许考虑不同地区的不同方案。然而,由于其投资价值的不确定性,这种药物开发方法并没有被所有赞助商系统地采用。方法:我们引入了价值驱动因素的概念,我们应用了药物开发和商业化现金流的预期净现值(eNPV)模型。本文为两个典型的假想生命周期管理iep概述了该方法。IEP值的度量被定义为使用IE程序时与不使用IE程序时eNPV的增量。结果:我们发现IEPs有很大的价值。其中一个例子包括进行一项观察性研究的计划,该研究可以作为批准的基础,代替传统的II期临床试验作为补充适应症。在另一个例子中,根据IIIb期研究中产生的关键证据,越来越多地采用新疗法会导致eNPV的高度正增量。结论:在规划IEPs时,使用价值驱动因素和基于enpv的价值模型可以为项目团队提供客观的指导。该价值可以通过正式的经济分析来估算,该分析考虑了计划的时间表、研发成本、监管部门批准的可能性估计、如果开发成功,患者可及性和临床采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.

Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.

Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.

Assessing the Value of Integrated Evidence Approaches in Drug Development.

Background: The use of Integrated Evidence Plans (IEPs) by the pharmaceutical industry has expanded in recent years with the aim of optimizing healthcare and patient outcomes. The evidence base of IEPs goes beyond traditional randomized controlled trials to provide holistic evidence suitable for all stakeholders and allows for consideration of different packages in different regions. However, this approach to drug development is not systematically adopted by all sponsors because of perceived uncertainty in its investment value.

Methods: We introduce the concept of value drivers to which we apply an expected net present value (eNPV) model of the cash flows for drug development and commercialization. The approach is outlined for two, typical, hypothetical lifecycle management IEPs. The measure of IEP value is defined as the increment in eNPV that occurs when IE programs are employed in comparison to when they are not.

Results: We found substantial value for IEPs. One example incorporated a plan to conduct an observational study that could be used as a basis for approval in lieu of a classical phase II trial for a supplemental indication. In the other example, increased adoption of the new treatment leads to a highly positive increment in eNPV based on the critical evidence generated in a phase IIIb study.

Conclusions: Use of value drivers and eNPV-based value models when planning for IEPs can provide objective guidance for project teams. The value can be estimated through formal economic analysis that considers planned timelines, R&D costs, estimates of the likelihood of regulatory approval, patient access and clinical adoption if development is successful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信