安全网络急诊科患者糖尿病管理的移动健康社会支持与标准支持:随机iii期试验

Q2 Medicine
JMIR Diabetes Pub Date : 2025-04-23 DOI:10.2196/56934
Elizabeth Burner, Danielle Hazime, Michael Menchine, Wendy Mack, Janisse Mercado, Adriana Aleman, Antonio Hernandez Saenz, Sanjay Arora, Shinyi Wu
{"title":"安全网络急诊科患者糖尿病管理的移动健康社会支持与标准支持:随机iii期试验","authors":"Elizabeth Burner, Danielle Hazime, Michael Menchine, Wendy Mack, Janisse Mercado, Adriana Aleman, Antonio Hernandez Saenz, Sanjay Arora, Shinyi Wu","doi":"10.2196/56934","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) is a low-cost method to improve health for patients with diabetes seeking care in safety-net emergency departments, resulting in improved medication adherence and self-management. Additions of social support to mHealth interventions could further enhance diabetes self-management by increasing the gains and the postintervention maintenance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed outcomes of an unblinded, parallel, equal-allocation randomized phase-III trial that tested a social support mHealth intervention to improve emergency department patients' diabetes self-management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) levels of ≥8.5% mg/dL and a text-capable phone were recruited during their emergency department visit for any reason (diabetes related or not) at a US public hospital along with a friend or family member as a supporter. Patients received 6 months of the Trial to Examine Text Messaging in Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes self-management mHealth program. Supporters were randomized to receive either (1) an mHealth social support program (Family and Friends Network Support)-daily SMS text messages guiding supporters to provide diabetes-related social support-or (2) a non-mHealth social support program as an active control-pamphlet-augmented social support with Family and Friends Network Support content. Point-of-care HbA<sub>1c</sub> level, self-reported diabetes self-care activities, medication adherence, and safety events were collected. Mixed-effects linear regression models analyzed group differences at the end of the intervention (6 months) and the postintervention phase (12 months) for HbA<sub>1c</sub> level and behavioral outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients were randomized. In total, 8.4% (n=14) reported type 1 diabetes, 66.9% (n=111) reported type 2 diabetes, and 24.7% (n=41) did not know their diabetes type; 50% (n=83) reported using insulin for diabetes management. Trial follow-up was completed with 58.4% (n=97) of the patients at 6 months and 63.9% (n=106) of the patients at 12 months. Both groups showed significant HbA<sub>1c</sub> level improvements (combined group change=1.36%, SD 2.42% mg/dL; 95% CI 0.87-1.83; P<.001), with no group difference (group mean difference=0.14%, SD 4.88% mg/dL; 95% CI -1.11 to 0.83; P=.87) at 6 months. At 12 months, both groups maintained their improved HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels, with a combined mean change from 6 months of 0.06% (SD 1.89% mg/dL; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.47; P=.76) and no clinically meaningful difference between groups. No differences were observed in safety events. In subgroup analyses, patients recently diagnosed with diabetes in the mHealth social support group improved their glycemic control compared to the standard social support group (between-group difference of 1.96%, SD 9.59% mg/dL; 95% CI -3.81 to -0.125; P=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 6-month change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> level did not differ by mode of social support in persons using an existing patient-focused mHealth diabetes self-management program, but both groups improved in self-management and glycemic control. Newly diagnosed patients with diabetes benefited most from mHealth-augmented social support.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03178773; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03178773.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.003.</p>","PeriodicalId":52371,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Diabetes","volume":"10 ","pages":"e56934"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059508/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"mHealth Social Support Versus Standard Support for Diabetes Management in Safety-Net Emergency Department Patients: Randomized Phase-III Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Burner, Danielle Hazime, Michael Menchine, Wendy Mack, Janisse Mercado, Adriana Aleman, Antonio Hernandez Saenz, Sanjay Arora, Shinyi Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/56934\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) is a low-cost method to improve health for patients with diabetes seeking care in safety-net emergency departments, resulting in improved medication adherence and self-management. Additions of social support to mHealth interventions could further enhance diabetes self-management by increasing the gains and the postintervention maintenance.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed outcomes of an unblinded, parallel, equal-allocation randomized phase-III trial that tested a social support mHealth intervention to improve emergency department patients' diabetes self-management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA<sub>1c</sub>) levels of ≥8.5% mg/dL and a text-capable phone were recruited during their emergency department visit for any reason (diabetes related or not) at a US public hospital along with a friend or family member as a supporter. Patients received 6 months of the Trial to Examine Text Messaging in Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes self-management mHealth program. Supporters were randomized to receive either (1) an mHealth social support program (Family and Friends Network Support)-daily SMS text messages guiding supporters to provide diabetes-related social support-or (2) a non-mHealth social support program as an active control-pamphlet-augmented social support with Family and Friends Network Support content. Point-of-care HbA<sub>1c</sub> level, self-reported diabetes self-care activities, medication adherence, and safety events were collected. Mixed-effects linear regression models analyzed group differences at the end of the intervention (6 months) and the postintervention phase (12 months) for HbA<sub>1c</sub> level and behavioral outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 patients were randomized. In total, 8.4% (n=14) reported type 1 diabetes, 66.9% (n=111) reported type 2 diabetes, and 24.7% (n=41) did not know their diabetes type; 50% (n=83) reported using insulin for diabetes management. Trial follow-up was completed with 58.4% (n=97) of the patients at 6 months and 63.9% (n=106) of the patients at 12 months. Both groups showed significant HbA<sub>1c</sub> level improvements (combined group change=1.36%, SD 2.42% mg/dL; 95% CI 0.87-1.83; P<.001), with no group difference (group mean difference=0.14%, SD 4.88% mg/dL; 95% CI -1.11 to 0.83; P=.87) at 6 months. At 12 months, both groups maintained their improved HbA<sub>1c</sub> levels, with a combined mean change from 6 months of 0.06% (SD 1.89% mg/dL; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.47; P=.76) and no clinically meaningful difference between groups. No differences were observed in safety events. In subgroup analyses, patients recently diagnosed with diabetes in the mHealth social support group improved their glycemic control compared to the standard social support group (between-group difference of 1.96%, SD 9.59% mg/dL; 95% CI -3.81 to -0.125; P=.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 6-month change in HbA<sub>1c</sub> level did not differ by mode of social support in persons using an existing patient-focused mHealth diabetes self-management program, but both groups improved in self-management and glycemic control. Newly diagnosed patients with diabetes benefited most from mHealth-augmented social support.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03178773; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03178773.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.003.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Diabetes\",\"volume\":\"10 \",\"pages\":\"e56934\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12059508/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Diabetes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/56934\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/56934","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:移动医疗(mHealth)是一种低成本的方法,可以改善在安全网急诊科寻求治疗的糖尿病患者的健康状况,从而改善药物依从性和自我管理。在移动医疗干预措施中增加社会支持可以通过增加收益和干预后维持来进一步加强糖尿病自我管理。目的:我们评估了一项非盲、平行、均等分配的随机iii期试验的结果,该试验测试了社会支持移动健康干预来改善急诊科患者的糖尿病自我管理。方法:招募糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平≥8.5% mg/dL的患者,在任何原因(糖尿病相关或非糖尿病相关)的美国公立医院急诊科就诊期间,由朋友或家人作为支持者。患者接受了6个月的试验,以检查急诊科糖尿病患者自我管理移动健康项目中的短信。支持者被随机分配接受(1)移动健康社会支持计划(家庭和朋友网络支持)-每天发送短信指导支持者提供与糖尿病相关的社会支持;或(2)非移动健康社会支持计划作为积极控制-小册子-增强社会支持与家庭和朋友网络支持内容。收集护理点HbA1c水平、自我报告的糖尿病自我护理活动、药物依从性和安全事件。混合效应线性回归模型分析干预结束(6个月)和干预后阶段(12个月)各组HbA1c水平和行为结果的差异。结果:共纳入166例患者。总共有8.4% (n=14)报告为1型糖尿病,66.9% (n=111)报告为2型糖尿病,24.7% (n=41)不知道自己的糖尿病类型;50% (n=83)报告使用胰岛素治疗糖尿病。6个月时58.4% (n=97)的患者完成了试验随访,12个月时63.9% (n=106)的患者完成了试验随访。两组HbA1c水平均有显著改善(联合组变化1.36%,SD变化2.42% mg/dL;95% ci 0.87-1.83;P1c水平,6个月的综合平均变化为0.06% (SD 1.89% mg/dL;95% CI -0.34 ~ 0.47;P= 0.76),两组间无临床意义差异。在安全事件方面没有观察到差异。在亚组分析中,与标准社会支持组相比,移动健康社会支持组中最近诊断为糖尿病的患者血糖控制得到改善(组间差异为1.96%,SD为9.59% mg/dL;95% CI -3.81 ~ -0.125;P = .04点)。结论:在使用现有的以患者为中心的移动健康糖尿病自我管理项目的人群中,HbA1c水平的6个月变化并没有因社会支持模式而不同,但两组患者的自我管理和血糖控制都有所改善。新诊断的糖尿病患者从移动医疗增强的社会支持中获益最多。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03178773;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03178773.International注册报告标识符(irrid): RR2-10.1016/j.c cct.2019.03.003。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
mHealth Social Support Versus Standard Support for Diabetes Management in Safety-Net Emergency Department Patients: Randomized Phase-III Trial.

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) is a low-cost method to improve health for patients with diabetes seeking care in safety-net emergency departments, resulting in improved medication adherence and self-management. Additions of social support to mHealth interventions could further enhance diabetes self-management by increasing the gains and the postintervention maintenance.

Objective: We assessed outcomes of an unblinded, parallel, equal-allocation randomized phase-III trial that tested a social support mHealth intervention to improve emergency department patients' diabetes self-management.

Methods: Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of ≥8.5% mg/dL and a text-capable phone were recruited during their emergency department visit for any reason (diabetes related or not) at a US public hospital along with a friend or family member as a supporter. Patients received 6 months of the Trial to Examine Text Messaging in Emergency Department Patients With Diabetes self-management mHealth program. Supporters were randomized to receive either (1) an mHealth social support program (Family and Friends Network Support)-daily SMS text messages guiding supporters to provide diabetes-related social support-or (2) a non-mHealth social support program as an active control-pamphlet-augmented social support with Family and Friends Network Support content. Point-of-care HbA1c level, self-reported diabetes self-care activities, medication adherence, and safety events were collected. Mixed-effects linear regression models analyzed group differences at the end of the intervention (6 months) and the postintervention phase (12 months) for HbA1c level and behavioral outcomes.

Results: A total of 166 patients were randomized. In total, 8.4% (n=14) reported type 1 diabetes, 66.9% (n=111) reported type 2 diabetes, and 24.7% (n=41) did not know their diabetes type; 50% (n=83) reported using insulin for diabetes management. Trial follow-up was completed with 58.4% (n=97) of the patients at 6 months and 63.9% (n=106) of the patients at 12 months. Both groups showed significant HbA1c level improvements (combined group change=1.36%, SD 2.42% mg/dL; 95% CI 0.87-1.83; P<.001), with no group difference (group mean difference=0.14%, SD 4.88% mg/dL; 95% CI -1.11 to 0.83; P=.87) at 6 months. At 12 months, both groups maintained their improved HbA1c levels, with a combined mean change from 6 months of 0.06% (SD 1.89% mg/dL; 95% CI -0.34 to 0.47; P=.76) and no clinically meaningful difference between groups. No differences were observed in safety events. In subgroup analyses, patients recently diagnosed with diabetes in the mHealth social support group improved their glycemic control compared to the standard social support group (between-group difference of 1.96%, SD 9.59% mg/dL; 95% CI -3.81 to -0.125; P=.04).

Conclusions: A 6-month change in HbA1c level did not differ by mode of social support in persons using an existing patient-focused mHealth diabetes self-management program, but both groups improved in self-management and glycemic control. Newly diagnosed patients with diabetes benefited most from mHealth-augmented social support.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03178773; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03178773.

International registered report identifier (irrid): RR2-10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.003.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Diabetes
JMIR Diabetes Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信