一个价值-目标启发工具的混合方法可用性试点在住院老年人预期急性后护理设置。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kirstin M Piazza, Caroline Pascal, Syama R Patel, Caroline Sefcik, Marilyn M Schapira, Caroline Madrigal, Katherine C Ritchey, Longyi Yip, Aanand D Naik, Robert E Burke
{"title":"一个价值-目标启发工具的混合方法可用性试点在住院老年人预期急性后护理设置。","authors":"Kirstin M Piazza, Caroline Pascal, Syama R Patel, Caroline Sefcik, Marilyn M Schapira, Caroline Madrigal, Katherine C Ritchey, Longyi Yip, Aanand D Naik, Robert E Burke","doi":"10.1177/00469580251332131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) emphasize aligning care with \"What Matters\" most to older adults. Hospitalization represents a critical period where value-based goals could shape key decisions about post-acute care transitions. However, few tools designed for eliciting such goals have been adapted for use in the inpatient setting, where the acute nature of care poses unique challenges. This mixed-methods study evaluates the usability of the Health Priorities Primer Tool (HPPT) in older hospitalized adults who anticipate needing post-acute care, aiming to identify necessary adaptations for the inpatient setting. We conducted interviews, observations, and surveys with older hospitalized patients to understand their experiences using the HPPT. We combined thematic analysis with descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Of the 26 participants, 73% expressed positive views toward completing a value-goal elicitation tool while hospitalized, with 53% supporting the HPPT. For open-ended questions, many participants shared broad goals like \"getting better\" without providing specific outcomes to achieve. For pre-determined checkbox-based questions, some participants found response options overwhelming or irrelevant. Most participants (85%) preferred facilitated administration of the tool over self-administration. Key Recommendations include simplifying the tool's format, personalizing content, and improving framing about how and why values and goals would be used. Our findings highlight the potential usability of value-goal elicitation tools like HPPT to guide post-acute care planning for hospitalized adults. Key adaptations, including facilitated administration and clinician involvement, may enhance usability. Early user engagement and tailoring are essential for successful implementation in busy inpatient settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251332131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.\",\"authors\":\"Kirstin M Piazza, Caroline Pascal, Syama R Patel, Caroline Sefcik, Marilyn M Schapira, Caroline Madrigal, Katherine C Ritchey, Longyi Yip, Aanand D Naik, Robert E Burke\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00469580251332131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) emphasize aligning care with \\\"What Matters\\\" most to older adults. Hospitalization represents a critical period where value-based goals could shape key decisions about post-acute care transitions. However, few tools designed for eliciting such goals have been adapted for use in the inpatient setting, where the acute nature of care poses unique challenges. This mixed-methods study evaluates the usability of the Health Priorities Primer Tool (HPPT) in older hospitalized adults who anticipate needing post-acute care, aiming to identify necessary adaptations for the inpatient setting. We conducted interviews, observations, and surveys with older hospitalized patients to understand their experiences using the HPPT. We combined thematic analysis with descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Of the 26 participants, 73% expressed positive views toward completing a value-goal elicitation tool while hospitalized, with 53% supporting the HPPT. For open-ended questions, many participants shared broad goals like \\\"getting better\\\" without providing specific outcomes to achieve. For pre-determined checkbox-based questions, some participants found response options overwhelming or irrelevant. Most participants (85%) preferred facilitated administration of the tool over self-administration. Key Recommendations include simplifying the tool's format, personalizing content, and improving framing about how and why values and goals would be used. Our findings highlight the potential usability of value-goal elicitation tools like HPPT to guide post-acute care planning for hospitalized adults. Key adaptations, including facilitated administration and clinician involvement, may enhance usability. Early user engagement and tailoring are essential for successful implementation in busy inpatient settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"469580251332131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251332131\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251332131","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

老年人友好型卫生系统(AFHS)强调将护理与老年人最关心的问题结合起来。住院治疗是一个关键时期,在这个时期,基于价值的目标可以塑造关于急性期后护理过渡的关键决策。然而,为实现这些目标而设计的工具很少适用于住院患者环境,在住院患者环境中,护理的急性性质带来了独特的挑战。这项混合方法研究评估了健康优先初级工具(HPPT)在预期需要急性后护理的住院老年人中的可用性,旨在确定住院环境的必要适应。我们对老年住院患者进行了访谈、观察和调查,以了解他们使用HPPT的经历。我们将专题分析与描述性统计相结合来分析数据。在26名参与者中,73%的人对住院期间完成价值目标激发工具表示积极看法,53%的人支持HPPT。对于开放式问题,许多参与者分享了诸如“变得更好”之类的广泛目标,但没有提供具体的实现结果。对于预先确定的基于复选框的问题,一些参与者发现回答选项过多或无关紧要。大多数参与者(85%)更喜欢辅助管理工具而不是自我管理。主要建议包括简化工具的格式,个性化内容,以及改进关于如何以及为什么使用价值和目标的框架。我们的研究结果强调了HPPT等价值目标激发工具在指导住院成人急性期后护理计划方面的潜在可用性。关键的调整,包括便利的管理和临床医生的参与,可能会提高可用性。早期用户参与和定制对于在繁忙的住院环境中成功实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.

A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.

A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.

A Mixed-Methods Usability Pilot of a Value-Goal Elicitation Tool in the Inpatient Setting for Older Adults Anticipating Post-Acute Care.

Age-Friendly Health Systems (AFHS) emphasize aligning care with "What Matters" most to older adults. Hospitalization represents a critical period where value-based goals could shape key decisions about post-acute care transitions. However, few tools designed for eliciting such goals have been adapted for use in the inpatient setting, where the acute nature of care poses unique challenges. This mixed-methods study evaluates the usability of the Health Priorities Primer Tool (HPPT) in older hospitalized adults who anticipate needing post-acute care, aiming to identify necessary adaptations for the inpatient setting. We conducted interviews, observations, and surveys with older hospitalized patients to understand their experiences using the HPPT. We combined thematic analysis with descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Of the 26 participants, 73% expressed positive views toward completing a value-goal elicitation tool while hospitalized, with 53% supporting the HPPT. For open-ended questions, many participants shared broad goals like "getting better" without providing specific outcomes to achieve. For pre-determined checkbox-based questions, some participants found response options overwhelming or irrelevant. Most participants (85%) preferred facilitated administration of the tool over self-administration. Key Recommendations include simplifying the tool's format, personalizing content, and improving framing about how and why values and goals would be used. Our findings highlight the potential usability of value-goal elicitation tools like HPPT to guide post-acute care planning for hospitalized adults. Key adaptations, including facilitated administration and clinician involvement, may enhance usability. Early user engagement and tailoring are essential for successful implementation in busy inpatient settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信