有限元分析,3d打印指南和导航系统优化碎片重新定位髋臼周围截骨。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Sheng-Hsun Lee, Sergio Guarin Perez, Adam J Wentworth, Timothy L Rossman, Rafael J Sierra
{"title":"有限元分析,3d打印指南和导航系统优化碎片重新定位髋臼周围截骨。","authors":"Sheng-Hsun Lee, Sergio Guarin Perez, Adam J Wentworth, Timothy L Rossman, Rafael J Sierra","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03376-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment to correct developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Traditionally, the goal of correction during PAO is based on parameters measured on 2-dimensional images. The aim of the study is to introduce an optimized workflow of PAO in DDH patients by means of personalized correction goal and accuracy of execution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients with DDH were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative computed tomography was performed. Surgical planning was done by the treating surgeon and engineers. The planned correction involved reorienting the osteotomized fragment to achieve a target lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 25°-40°.The pelvic model with the preoperative and planned correction was analyzed by finite element analysis, which simulated single-leg stance condition. Average and maximal acetabular stresses in different anatomical areas were calculated and are presented as a dashboard at ± 3° increments to help the surgeon determine the ideal correction. To ensure accuracy of the osteotomy and correction as planned, 3D-printed cutting and reorientation guides were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average operation time (101 ± 23 min) and blood loss (651 ± 176 ml) were comparable to previous reports. Radiographic parameters improved significantly, including LCEA (20.0<sup>°</sup> ± 6.4<sup>°</sup> vs. 30.2<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.037) and AI (12.5<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup> vs. 0.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.6<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.001). The planned correction was similar to the final correction (LCEA planned 31.1<sup>°</sup> ± 2.0<sup>°</sup> vs. final 30.2<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.268; AI planned 1.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.5<sup>°</sup> vs. final 0.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.6<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.349). During an average follow-up period of 1.2 years, all osteotomies healed and these patients reported a significant reduction in mean global pain scale from 70 preoperatively to 23 postoperatively (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The workflow with FEA simulations to optimize mechanical stress and 3D-printed cutting guides to achieve accurate execution was an effective and safe approach to optimize DDH treatment. Further refinements and further evaluation of navigation systems aimed at obtaining planned correction is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"2031-2041"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Finite element analyses, 3D-printed guides and navigation system optimizes fragment reorientation for periacetabular osteotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Hsun Lee, Sergio Guarin Perez, Adam J Wentworth, Timothy L Rossman, Rafael J Sierra\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11548-025-03376-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment to correct developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Traditionally, the goal of correction during PAO is based on parameters measured on 2-dimensional images. The aim of the study is to introduce an optimized workflow of PAO in DDH patients by means of personalized correction goal and accuracy of execution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five patients with DDH were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative computed tomography was performed. Surgical planning was done by the treating surgeon and engineers. The planned correction involved reorienting the osteotomized fragment to achieve a target lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 25°-40°.The pelvic model with the preoperative and planned correction was analyzed by finite element analysis, which simulated single-leg stance condition. Average and maximal acetabular stresses in different anatomical areas were calculated and are presented as a dashboard at ± 3° increments to help the surgeon determine the ideal correction. To ensure accuracy of the osteotomy and correction as planned, 3D-printed cutting and reorientation guides were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average operation time (101 ± 23 min) and blood loss (651 ± 176 ml) were comparable to previous reports. Radiographic parameters improved significantly, including LCEA (20.0<sup>°</sup> ± 6.4<sup>°</sup> vs. 30.2<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.037) and AI (12.5<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup> vs. 0.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.6<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.001). The planned correction was similar to the final correction (LCEA planned 31.1<sup>°</sup> ± 2.0<sup>°</sup> vs. final 30.2<sup>°</sup> ± 3.1<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.268; AI planned 1.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.5<sup>°</sup> vs. final 0.8<sup>°</sup> ± 1.6<sup>°</sup>, p = 0.349). During an average follow-up period of 1.2 years, all osteotomies healed and these patients reported a significant reduction in mean global pain scale from 70 preoperatively to 23 postoperatively (p = 0.016).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The workflow with FEA simulations to optimize mechanical stress and 3D-printed cutting guides to achieve accurate execution was an effective and safe approach to optimize DDH treatment. Further refinements and further evaluation of navigation systems aimed at obtaining planned correction is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2031-2041\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03376-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03376-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)是矫正髋关节发育不良(DDH)的有效治疗方法。传统上,PAO过程中的校正目标是基于在二维图像上测量的参数。本研究的目的是通过个性化的矫正目标和执行的准确性来引入DDH患者PAO的优化工作流程。方法:前瞻性纳入5例DDH患者。术前行计算机断层扫描。手术计划由治疗外科医生和工程师完成。计划的矫正包括重新定位截骨碎片以达到25°-40°的目标外侧中心边缘角(LCEA)。采用模拟单腿站立状态的有限元分析方法对术前和计划矫正后的骨盆模型进行分析。计算不同解剖区域的平均和最大髋臼应力,并以±3°的增量作为仪表板显示,以帮助外科医生确定理想的矫正。为了确保截骨和矫正的准确性,使用了3d打印的切割和重新定位指南。结果:平均手术时间(101±23 min)和出血量(651±176 ml)与既往报道相当。放射学参数显著改善,包括LCEA(20.0°±6.4°vs. 30.2°±3.1°,p = 0.037)和AI(12.5°±3.1°vs. 0.8°±1.6°,p = 0.001)。计划矫正与最终矫正相似(LCEA计划矫正31.1°±2.0°vs最终矫正30.2°±3.1°,p = 0.268;AI计划1.8°±1.5°和最终的0.8°±1.6°,p = 0.349)。在平均1.2年的随访期间,所有截骨手术愈合,这些患者报告的平均整体疼痛评分从术前70分显著降低到术后23分(p = 0.016)。结论:利用有限元模拟优化机械应力和3d打印切割导轨实现精确执行的工作流程是优化DDH治疗的有效且安全的方法。有必要进一步改进和进一步评估导航系统,以获得计划的校正。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Finite element analyses, 3D-printed guides and navigation system optimizes fragment reorientation for periacetabular osteotomy.

Purpose: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is an effective treatment to correct developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). Traditionally, the goal of correction during PAO is based on parameters measured on 2-dimensional images. The aim of the study is to introduce an optimized workflow of PAO in DDH patients by means of personalized correction goal and accuracy of execution.

Methods: Five patients with DDH were prospectively enrolled. Preoperative computed tomography was performed. Surgical planning was done by the treating surgeon and engineers. The planned correction involved reorienting the osteotomized fragment to achieve a target lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) of 25°-40°.The pelvic model with the preoperative and planned correction was analyzed by finite element analysis, which simulated single-leg stance condition. Average and maximal acetabular stresses in different anatomical areas were calculated and are presented as a dashboard at ± 3° increments to help the surgeon determine the ideal correction. To ensure accuracy of the osteotomy and correction as planned, 3D-printed cutting and reorientation guides were used.

Results: Average operation time (101 ± 23 min) and blood loss (651 ± 176 ml) were comparable to previous reports. Radiographic parameters improved significantly, including LCEA (20.0° ± 6.4° vs. 30.2° ± 3.1°, p = 0.037) and AI (12.5° ± 3.1° vs. 0.8° ± 1.6°, p = 0.001). The planned correction was similar to the final correction (LCEA planned 31.1° ± 2.0° vs. final 30.2° ± 3.1°, p = 0.268; AI planned 1.8° ± 1.5° vs. final 0.8° ± 1.6°, p = 0.349). During an average follow-up period of 1.2 years, all osteotomies healed and these patients reported a significant reduction in mean global pain scale from 70 preoperatively to 23 postoperatively (p = 0.016).

Conclusion: The workflow with FEA simulations to optimize mechanical stress and 3D-printed cutting guides to achieve accurate execution was an effective and safe approach to optimize DDH treatment. Further refinements and further evaluation of navigation systems aimed at obtaining planned correction is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信