加热高流量鼻插管治疗围手术期意外低温症的可行性研究。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Kirklen Petersen, Spencer Rice, Kenneth Potter, Shannon Boylan, Kristina Clark, Megan McCartney, Laura Lahaye
{"title":"加热高流量鼻插管治疗围手术期意外低温症的可行性研究。","authors":"Kirklen Petersen, Spencer Rice, Kenneth Potter, Shannon Boylan, Kristina Clark, Megan McCartney, Laura Lahaye","doi":"10.1089/ther.2025.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There are many established strategies to target normothermia in the perioperative period; however, hypothermia remains a common occurrence and can have significant impacts on patient outcomes, unanticipated admissions, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) throughput. This pilot study serves to shed light on the effectiveness of using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as an alternative to a Bair Hugger (BH). This pilot study compares 10 patients warmed to normothermia with HFNC in the PACU with 15 patients warmed with traditional BH. Patients in the HFNC group reached the goal temperature of 36°C 9.1 minutes faster than the BH group. However, these findings were not statistically significant (mean time: 72.1 minutes vs 81.2; <i>p</i> = 0.247). In addition, phase 1 recovery times were about 8 minutes longer in the HFNC group compared with the BH group but were also not statistically significant (mean time: 180.8 minutes vs 172.4; <i>p</i> = 0.338). Based on the initial data, HFNC may play an important role in the future by making PACU rewarming more efficient and therefore having a huge impact on PACU discharge times, unanticipated hospital admissions, delayed emergence from anesthesia, and morbid cardiac events. Further large scale, randomized control studies need to be done to investigate HFNC as an alternative rewarming method for hypothermic patients in the PACU.</p>","PeriodicalId":22972,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heated High-Flow Nasal Cannula for the Treatment of Unintended Perioperative Hypothermia: A Feasibility Study.\",\"authors\":\"Kirklen Petersen, Spencer Rice, Kenneth Potter, Shannon Boylan, Kristina Clark, Megan McCartney, Laura Lahaye\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/ther.2025.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There are many established strategies to target normothermia in the perioperative period; however, hypothermia remains a common occurrence and can have significant impacts on patient outcomes, unanticipated admissions, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) throughput. This pilot study serves to shed light on the effectiveness of using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as an alternative to a Bair Hugger (BH). This pilot study compares 10 patients warmed to normothermia with HFNC in the PACU with 15 patients warmed with traditional BH. Patients in the HFNC group reached the goal temperature of 36°C 9.1 minutes faster than the BH group. However, these findings were not statistically significant (mean time: 72.1 minutes vs 81.2; <i>p</i> = 0.247). In addition, phase 1 recovery times were about 8 minutes longer in the HFNC group compared with the BH group but were also not statistically significant (mean time: 180.8 minutes vs 172.4; <i>p</i> = 0.338). Based on the initial data, HFNC may play an important role in the future by making PACU rewarming more efficient and therefore having a huge impact on PACU discharge times, unanticipated hospital admissions, delayed emergence from anesthesia, and morbid cardiac events. Further large scale, randomized control studies need to be done to investigate HFNC as an alternative rewarming method for hypothermic patients in the PACU.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22972,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2025.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic hypothermia and temperature management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/ther.2025.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

有许多既定的策略来针对围手术期的正常体温;然而,体温过低仍然是一种常见的情况,并可能对患者的预后、意外入院和麻醉后护理单位(PACU)的吞吐量产生重大影响。本初步研究旨在阐明使用高流量鼻插管(HFNC)作为毛发拥抱器(BH)的替代品的有效性。这项初步研究比较了在PACU中使用HFNC加热至常温的10例患者和使用传统BH加热的15例患者。HFNC组患者达到36℃目标温度比BH组快9.1 min。然而,这些发现没有统计学意义(平均时间:72.1分钟vs 81.2分钟;P = 0.247)。此外,HFNC组的1期恢复时间比BH组长约8分钟,但也没有统计学意义(平均时间:180.8分钟vs 172.4分钟;P = 0.338)。根据初步数据,HFNC可能在未来发挥重要作用,使PACU复温更有效,从而对PACU出院时间、意外住院、麻醉后复苏延迟和心脏发病事件产生巨大影响。需要进一步进行大规模的随机对照研究来研究HFNC作为PACU中低温患者的替代复温方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heated High-Flow Nasal Cannula for the Treatment of Unintended Perioperative Hypothermia: A Feasibility Study.

There are many established strategies to target normothermia in the perioperative period; however, hypothermia remains a common occurrence and can have significant impacts on patient outcomes, unanticipated admissions, and postanesthesia care unit (PACU) throughput. This pilot study serves to shed light on the effectiveness of using high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as an alternative to a Bair Hugger (BH). This pilot study compares 10 patients warmed to normothermia with HFNC in the PACU with 15 patients warmed with traditional BH. Patients in the HFNC group reached the goal temperature of 36°C 9.1 minutes faster than the BH group. However, these findings were not statistically significant (mean time: 72.1 minutes vs 81.2; p = 0.247). In addition, phase 1 recovery times were about 8 minutes longer in the HFNC group compared with the BH group but were also not statistically significant (mean time: 180.8 minutes vs 172.4; p = 0.338). Based on the initial data, HFNC may play an important role in the future by making PACU rewarming more efficient and therefore having a huge impact on PACU discharge times, unanticipated hospital admissions, delayed emergence from anesthesia, and morbid cardiac events. Further large scale, randomized control studies need to be done to investigate HFNC as an alternative rewarming method for hypothermic patients in the PACU.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management is the first and only journal to cover all aspects of hypothermia and temperature considerations relevant to this exciting field, including its application in cardiac arrest, spinal cord and traumatic brain injury, stroke, burns, and much more. The Journal provides a strong multidisciplinary forum to ensure that research advances are well disseminated, and that therapeutic hypothermia is well understood and used effectively to enhance patient outcomes. Novel findings from translational preclinical investigations as well as clinical studies and trials are featured in original articles, state-of-the-art review articles, protocols and best practices. Therapeutic Hypothermia and Temperature Management coverage includes: Temperature mechanisms and cooling strategies Protocols, risk factors, and drug interventions Intraoperative considerations Post-resuscitation cooling ICU management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信