{"title":"中低收入国家远程精神病学干预治疗抑郁症的比较疗效:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Chanittha Senachai, Nilawan Upakdee, Teerapon Dhippayom, Worapong Lueyam, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2025.0057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Depression represents a major public health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Telepsychiatry provides a promising solution by offering remote mental health services, overcoming barriers such as limited resources, isolation, and cost. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different telepsychiatry interventions in LMICs by network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). <b>Methods</b>: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses from inception to May 2024 to identify all relevant studies. Telepsychiatry interventions were categorized as: (1) CBTAppGuided, a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) app with professional guidance; (2) CBTChatBot, a CBT app that uses a chatbot for guidance; (3) CBTApp, a CBT app without professional guidance; (4) Reminder; and (5) Consultation. Study quality was assessed according to the Effective Practice and Organization of Care guideline. Depression severity was calculated using summary standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <b>Results</b>: Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1,469 adults (mean age range: 16.0-35.64 years). Compared with face-to-face usual care, the most effective telepsychiatry intervention was CBTAppGuided [-23.04, 95% CI: -26.12 to -19.96], followed by CBTChatBot [-5.27, 95% CI: -6.25 to -4.29]. Other interventions, including CBTApp [-0.83, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.34], Reminder [-0.44, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.16], and Consultation [-0.27, 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.26], demonstrated smaller effects. CBTAppGuided, CBTChatBot, CBTApp, and Reminder achieved statistically significant improvement, whereas Consultation did not show statistically significant improvement and was not different from face-to-face treatment. <b>Conclusion</b>: Telepsychiatry interventions, particularly CBTAppGuided, show potential for reducing depression severity in LMICs, with promising outcomes for both guided and unguided app-based formats. Further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":"1064-1073"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Efficacy of Telepsychiatry Interventions for Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Chanittha Senachai, Nilawan Upakdee, Teerapon Dhippayom, Worapong Lueyam, Piyameth Dilokthornsakul\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2025.0057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Depression represents a major public health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Telepsychiatry provides a promising solution by offering remote mental health services, overcoming barriers such as limited resources, isolation, and cost. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different telepsychiatry interventions in LMICs by network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). <b>Methods</b>: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses from inception to May 2024 to identify all relevant studies. Telepsychiatry interventions were categorized as: (1) CBTAppGuided, a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) app with professional guidance; (2) CBTChatBot, a CBT app that uses a chatbot for guidance; (3) CBTApp, a CBT app without professional guidance; (4) Reminder; and (5) Consultation. Study quality was assessed according to the Effective Practice and Organization of Care guideline. Depression severity was calculated using summary standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). <b>Results</b>: Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1,469 adults (mean age range: 16.0-35.64 years). Compared with face-to-face usual care, the most effective telepsychiatry intervention was CBTAppGuided [-23.04, 95% CI: -26.12 to -19.96], followed by CBTChatBot [-5.27, 95% CI: -6.25 to -4.29]. Other interventions, including CBTApp [-0.83, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.34], Reminder [-0.44, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.16], and Consultation [-0.27, 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.26], demonstrated smaller effects. CBTAppGuided, CBTChatBot, CBTApp, and Reminder achieved statistically significant improvement, whereas Consultation did not show statistically significant improvement and was not different from face-to-face treatment. <b>Conclusion</b>: Telepsychiatry interventions, particularly CBTAppGuided, show potential for reducing depression severity in LMICs, with promising outcomes for both guided and unguided app-based formats. Further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1064-1073\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0057\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2025.0057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Efficacy of Telepsychiatry Interventions for Depression in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Background: Depression represents a major public health burden, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Telepsychiatry provides a promising solution by offering remote mental health services, overcoming barriers such as limited resources, isolation, and cost. This study aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of different telepsychiatry interventions in LMICs by network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses from inception to May 2024 to identify all relevant studies. Telepsychiatry interventions were categorized as: (1) CBTAppGuided, a cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) app with professional guidance; (2) CBTChatBot, a CBT app that uses a chatbot for guidance; (3) CBTApp, a CBT app without professional guidance; (4) Reminder; and (5) Consultation. Study quality was assessed according to the Effective Practice and Organization of Care guideline. Depression severity was calculated using summary standardized mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Seven RCTs were included with a total of 1,469 adults (mean age range: 16.0-35.64 years). Compared with face-to-face usual care, the most effective telepsychiatry intervention was CBTAppGuided [-23.04, 95% CI: -26.12 to -19.96], followed by CBTChatBot [-5.27, 95% CI: -6.25 to -4.29]. Other interventions, including CBTApp [-0.83, 95% CI: -1.32 to -0.34], Reminder [-0.44, 95% CI: -0.72 to -0.16], and Consultation [-0.27, 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.26], demonstrated smaller effects. CBTAppGuided, CBTChatBot, CBTApp, and Reminder achieved statistically significant improvement, whereas Consultation did not show statistically significant improvement and was not different from face-to-face treatment. Conclusion: Telepsychiatry interventions, particularly CBTAppGuided, show potential for reducing depression severity in LMICs, with promising outcomes for both guided and unguided app-based formats. Further research is needed to confirm their effectiveness in resource-limited settings.
期刊介绍:
Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings.
Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.