肺部SBRT患者短时间剂量补偿的生物适应性放疗。

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1002/mp.17820
Daisuke Kawahara, Akito S Koganezawa, Hikaru Yamaguchi, Takuya Wada, Yuji Murakami
{"title":"肺部SBRT患者短时间剂量补偿的生物适应性放疗。","authors":"Daisuke Kawahara, Akito S Koganezawa, Hikaru Yamaguchi, Takuya Wada, Yuji Murakami","doi":"10.1002/mp.17820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional adaptive radiation therapy (ART) primarily focuses on adapting to anatomical changes during radiation therapy but does not account for biological effects such as changes in radiosensitivity and tumor response, particularly during treatment interruptions. These interruptions may allow sublethal damage repair in tumor cells, reducing the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel biological adaptive radiotherapy (BART) framework to compensate for the biological effects of radiation interruptions during SBRT for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved lung SBRT patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy. We evaluated the biological dose loss using a microdosimetric kinetic model during four interruption durations (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). The reduction in the biological dose due to interruptions was calculated. The physical dose was calculated from the decreased biological dose in the in-house software, which was incorporated into the TPS. The optimization process was conducted for dose compensation in the TPS. To quantitatively assess the impact of BART on dose distribution, we evaluated the differences in target dose coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) exposure between the original plan (without interruption), the plan with interruption, the BART plan, and the plan summing the dose before the interruption and the physical dose after compensation (compensated PD plan). The compensated PD plan assumed no biological dose reduction before the interruption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without BART compensation, interruptions of 30, 60, 90, and 120 min resulted in biological dose reductions, ranging from 12.1% to 19.0% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and from 16.4% to 24.9% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. After applying BART, the differences were minimized to -1.5% to -0.6% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the GTV and -0.1% to 0.9% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. In contrast, the compensated PD plan exhibited larger residual deviations, with dose differences ranging from -9.9% to -14.0% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the GTV and -12.3% to -7.3% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. The volume differences between the BART plan and the plan without interruption remained within -0.8% to -0.4% for V<sub>5Gy</sub> and -0.2% to 0.0% for V<sub>20Gy</sub>, while differences between the BART and compensated PD plans were similarly small. The maximum dose to the spinal cord (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>) also remained within -0.2 to 0.1 Gy for the BART plan relative to the plan without interruption and -0.1 to -0.5 Gy compared to the compensated PD plan. These results confirm that the OAR doses remained within clinically acceptable constraints across all evaluated plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the BART framework effectively compensates for the biological dose reduction caused by interruptions during lung cancer SBRT. BART successfully maintained target dose coverage and minimized biological dose loss for the target, while keeping OAR doses within safe limits, including for the lungs and spinal cord. The introduction of BART marks a significant advancement in adaptive radiotherapy, offering a comprehensive approach to managing interruptions and improving clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biological adaptive radiotherapy for short-time dose compensation in lung SBRT patients.\",\"authors\":\"Daisuke Kawahara, Akito S Koganezawa, Hikaru Yamaguchi, Takuya Wada, Yuji Murakami\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.17820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conventional adaptive radiation therapy (ART) primarily focuses on adapting to anatomical changes during radiation therapy but does not account for biological effects such as changes in radiosensitivity and tumor response, particularly during treatment interruptions. These interruptions may allow sublethal damage repair in tumor cells, reducing the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel biological adaptive radiotherapy (BART) framework to compensate for the biological effects of radiation interruptions during SBRT for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved lung SBRT patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy. We evaluated the biological dose loss using a microdosimetric kinetic model during four interruption durations (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). The reduction in the biological dose due to interruptions was calculated. The physical dose was calculated from the decreased biological dose in the in-house software, which was incorporated into the TPS. The optimization process was conducted for dose compensation in the TPS. To quantitatively assess the impact of BART on dose distribution, we evaluated the differences in target dose coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) exposure between the original plan (without interruption), the plan with interruption, the BART plan, and the plan summing the dose before the interruption and the physical dose after compensation (compensated PD plan). The compensated PD plan assumed no biological dose reduction before the interruption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Without BART compensation, interruptions of 30, 60, 90, and 120 min resulted in biological dose reductions, ranging from 12.1% to 19.0% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and from 16.4% to 24.9% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. After applying BART, the differences were minimized to -1.5% to -0.6% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the GTV and -0.1% to 0.9% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. In contrast, the compensated PD plan exhibited larger residual deviations, with dose differences ranging from -9.9% to -14.0% for D<sub>50%</sub> of the GTV and -12.3% to -7.3% for D<sub>98%</sub> of the PTV. The volume differences between the BART plan and the plan without interruption remained within -0.8% to -0.4% for V<sub>5Gy</sub> and -0.2% to 0.0% for V<sub>20Gy</sub>, while differences between the BART and compensated PD plans were similarly small. The maximum dose to the spinal cord (D<sub>0.1cc</sub>) also remained within -0.2 to 0.1 Gy for the BART plan relative to the plan without interruption and -0.1 to -0.5 Gy compared to the compensated PD plan. These results confirm that the OAR doses remained within clinically acceptable constraints across all evaluated plans.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated that the BART framework effectively compensates for the biological dose reduction caused by interruptions during lung cancer SBRT. BART successfully maintained target dose coverage and minimized biological dose loss for the target, while keeping OAR doses within safe limits, including for the lungs and spinal cord. The introduction of BART marks a significant advancement in adaptive radiotherapy, offering a comprehensive approach to managing interruptions and improving clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17820\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:传统的适应性放射治疗(ART)主要侧重于适应放射治疗过程中的解剖变化,但没有考虑诸如放射敏感性和肿瘤反应的变化等生物学效应,特别是在治疗中断期间。这些中断可能允许肿瘤细胞的亚致死损伤修复,降低立体定向全身放射治疗(SBRT)的有效性。目的:本研究的目的是开发和评估一种新的生物适应性放疗(BART)框架,以补偿肺癌SBRT期间辐射中断的生物学效应。方法:本研究纳入肺部SBRT患者,采用体积调节电弧治疗。我们使用微剂量动力学模型评估了四个中断时间(30,60,90,120分钟)的生物剂量损失。计算了中断引起的生物剂量的减少。物理剂量在内部软件中根据减少的生物剂量计算,并纳入TPS。对TPS中的剂量补偿进行了优化。为了定量评估BART对剂量分布的影响,我们评估了原计划(不中断)、中断计划、BART计划和中断前剂量与补偿后物理剂量相加的计划(补偿PD计划)之间靶剂量覆盖和器官危险(OAR)暴露的差异。补偿PD计划假定在中断前没有生物剂量减少。结果:在没有BART补偿的情况下,30、60、90和120分钟的中断导致生物剂量减少,占总肿瘤体积(GTV)的12.1%至19.0%,占总肿瘤体积(PTV)的16.4%至24.9%。应用BART后,GTV的D50%和PTV的D98%的差异被最小化至-1.5%至-0.6%。相比之下,补偿PD计划显示出更大的残余偏差,D50% GTV的剂量差异为-9.9%至-14.0%,D98% PTV的剂量差异为-12.3%至-7.3%。对于V5Gy和V20Gy, BART计划和不中断计划之间的体积差异保持在-0.8%到-0.4%之间,而对于V20Gy, BART计划和补偿PD计划之间的差异同样很小。BART计划对脊髓的最大剂量(D0.1cc)也保持在-0.2至0.1 Gy(相对于无中断的计划)和-0.1至-0.5 Gy(相对于代偿PD计划)之间。这些结果证实,在所有评估计划中,OAR剂量仍在临床可接受的限制范围内。结论:本研究表明BART框架有效补偿了肺癌SBRT期间中断引起的生物剂量减少。BART成功地维持了目标剂量覆盖范围,并将目标的生物剂量损失降至最低,同时将OAR剂量保持在安全范围内,包括肺和脊髓。BART的引入标志着适应性放疗的重大进步,提供了管理中断和改善临床结果的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biological adaptive radiotherapy for short-time dose compensation in lung SBRT patients.

Background: Conventional adaptive radiation therapy (ART) primarily focuses on adapting to anatomical changes during radiation therapy but does not account for biological effects such as changes in radiosensitivity and tumor response, particularly during treatment interruptions. These interruptions may allow sublethal damage repair in tumor cells, reducing the effectiveness of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Purpose: The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel biological adaptive radiotherapy (BART) framework to compensate for the biological effects of radiation interruptions during SBRT for lung cancer.

Methods: This study involved lung SBRT patients using volumetric modulated arc therapy. We evaluated the biological dose loss using a microdosimetric kinetic model during four interruption durations (30, 60, 90, and 120 min). The reduction in the biological dose due to interruptions was calculated. The physical dose was calculated from the decreased biological dose in the in-house software, which was incorporated into the TPS. The optimization process was conducted for dose compensation in the TPS. To quantitatively assess the impact of BART on dose distribution, we evaluated the differences in target dose coverage and organ-at-risk (OAR) exposure between the original plan (without interruption), the plan with interruption, the BART plan, and the plan summing the dose before the interruption and the physical dose after compensation (compensated PD plan). The compensated PD plan assumed no biological dose reduction before the interruption.

Results: Without BART compensation, interruptions of 30, 60, 90, and 120 min resulted in biological dose reductions, ranging from 12.1% to 19.0% for D50% of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and from 16.4% to 24.9% for D98% of the PTV. After applying BART, the differences were minimized to -1.5% to -0.6% for D50% of the GTV and -0.1% to 0.9% for D98% of the PTV. In contrast, the compensated PD plan exhibited larger residual deviations, with dose differences ranging from -9.9% to -14.0% for D50% of the GTV and -12.3% to -7.3% for D98% of the PTV. The volume differences between the BART plan and the plan without interruption remained within -0.8% to -0.4% for V5Gy and -0.2% to 0.0% for V20Gy, while differences between the BART and compensated PD plans were similarly small. The maximum dose to the spinal cord (D0.1cc) also remained within -0.2 to 0.1 Gy for the BART plan relative to the plan without interruption and -0.1 to -0.5 Gy compared to the compensated PD plan. These results confirm that the OAR doses remained within clinically acceptable constraints across all evaluated plans.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the BART framework effectively compensates for the biological dose reduction caused by interruptions during lung cancer SBRT. BART successfully maintained target dose coverage and minimized biological dose loss for the target, while keeping OAR doses within safe limits, including for the lungs and spinal cord. The introduction of BART marks a significant advancement in adaptive radiotherapy, offering a comprehensive approach to managing interruptions and improving clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信