Lars Skattebøl, Gro O Nygaard, Esten H Leonardsen, Tobias Kaufmann, Thomas Moridi, Leszek Stawiarz, Russel Ouellette, Benjamin V Ineichen, Daniel Ferreira, J Sebastian Muehlboeck, Mona K Beyer, Piotr Sowa, Ali Manouchehrinia, Eric Westman, Tomas Olsson, Elisabeth G Celius, Jan Hillert, Ingrid Kockum, Hanne F Harbo, Fredrik Piehl, Tobias Granberg, Lars T Westlye, Einar A Høgestøl
{"title":"多发性硬化症的脑年龄:深度学习和传统机器学习的研究。","authors":"Lars Skattebøl, Gro O Nygaard, Esten H Leonardsen, Tobias Kaufmann, Thomas Moridi, Leszek Stawiarz, Russel Ouellette, Benjamin V Ineichen, Daniel Ferreira, J Sebastian Muehlboeck, Mona K Beyer, Piotr Sowa, Ali Manouchehrinia, Eric Westman, Tomas Olsson, Elisabeth G Celius, Jan Hillert, Ingrid Kockum, Hanne F Harbo, Fredrik Piehl, Tobias Granberg, Lars T Westlye, Einar A Høgestøl","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>'Brain age' is a numerical estimate of the biological age of the brain and an overall effort to measure neurodegeneration, regardless of disease type. In multiple sclerosis, accelerated brain ageing has been linked to disability accrual. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool for the assessment and quantification of the impact of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the existence of numerous AI models, there is a noticeable lack of comparative imaging data for traditional machine learning versus deep learning in conditions such as multiple sclerosis. A retrospective observational study was initiated to analyse clinical and MRI data (4584 MRIs) from various scanners in a large longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1516) of people with multiple sclerosis collected from two institutions (Karolinska Institute and Oslo University Hospital) using a uniform data post-processing pipeline. We conducted a comparative assessment of brain age using a deep learning simple fully convolutional network and a well-established traditional machine learning model. This study was primarily aimed to validate the deep learning brain age model in multiple sclerosis. The correlation between estimated brain age and chronological age was stronger for the deep learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the traditional machine learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). An increase in brain age was significantly associated with higher expanded disability status scale scores (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 3.7, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and longer disease duration (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 6.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 5.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant inter-model difference in clinical correlation or effect measure was found, but significant differences for traditional machine learning-derived brain age estimates were found between several scanners. Our study suggests that the deep learning-derived brain age is significantly associated with clinical disability, performed equally well to the traditional machine learning-derived brain age measures, and may counteract scanner variability.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"7 3","pages":"fcaf152"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a study with deep learning and traditional machine learning.\",\"authors\":\"Lars Skattebøl, Gro O Nygaard, Esten H Leonardsen, Tobias Kaufmann, Thomas Moridi, Leszek Stawiarz, Russel Ouellette, Benjamin V Ineichen, Daniel Ferreira, J Sebastian Muehlboeck, Mona K Beyer, Piotr Sowa, Ali Manouchehrinia, Eric Westman, Tomas Olsson, Elisabeth G Celius, Jan Hillert, Ingrid Kockum, Hanne F Harbo, Fredrik Piehl, Tobias Granberg, Lars T Westlye, Einar A Høgestøl\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/braincomms/fcaf152\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>'Brain age' is a numerical estimate of the biological age of the brain and an overall effort to measure neurodegeneration, regardless of disease type. In multiple sclerosis, accelerated brain ageing has been linked to disability accrual. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool for the assessment and quantification of the impact of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the existence of numerous AI models, there is a noticeable lack of comparative imaging data for traditional machine learning versus deep learning in conditions such as multiple sclerosis. A retrospective observational study was initiated to analyse clinical and MRI data (4584 MRIs) from various scanners in a large longitudinal cohort (<i>n</i> = 1516) of people with multiple sclerosis collected from two institutions (Karolinska Institute and Oslo University Hospital) using a uniform data post-processing pipeline. We conducted a comparative assessment of brain age using a deep learning simple fully convolutional network and a well-established traditional machine learning model. This study was primarily aimed to validate the deep learning brain age model in multiple sclerosis. The correlation between estimated brain age and chronological age was stronger for the deep learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.90, <i>P</i> < 0.001) than the traditional machine learning estimates (<i>r</i> = 0.75, <i>P</i> < 0.001). An increase in brain age was significantly associated with higher expanded disability status scale scores (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 5.3, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 3.7, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and longer disease duration (traditional machine learning: <i>t</i> = 6.5, <i>P</i> < 0.001; deep learning: <i>t</i> = 5.8, <i>P</i> < 0.001). No significant inter-model difference in clinical correlation or effect measure was found, but significant differences for traditional machine learning-derived brain age estimates were found between several scanners. Our study suggests that the deep learning-derived brain age is significantly associated with clinical disability, performed equally well to the traditional machine learning-derived brain age measures, and may counteract scanner variability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain communications\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"fcaf152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12056726/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf152\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcaf152","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
“脑年龄”是对大脑生物学年龄的一个数字估计,是衡量神经退行性疾病的一项总体努力,与疾病类型无关。在多发性硬化症中,大脑加速老化与残疾累积有关。人工智能已经成为评估和量化神经退行性疾病影响的有前途的工具。尽管存在许多人工智能模型,但在多发性硬化症等疾病中,传统机器学习与深度学习的对比成像数据明显缺乏。一项回顾性观察性研究开始分析来自两个机构(卡罗林斯卡研究所和奥斯陆大学医院)的多发性硬化症患者的大型纵向队列(n = 1516)的各种扫描仪的临床和MRI数据(4584个MRI),使用统一的数据后处理管道。我们使用深度学习简单全卷积网络和成熟的传统机器学习模型对大脑年龄进行了比较评估。本研究的主要目的是验证多发性硬化症的深度学习脑年龄模型。深度学习估计值(r = 0.90, P < 0.001)与传统机器学习估计值(r = 0.75, P < 0.001)相比,估计的脑年龄和实足年龄之间的相关性更强。脑年龄的增加与更高的扩展残疾状态量表得分显著相关(传统机器学习:t = 5.3, P < 0.001;深度学习:t = 3.7, P < 0.001)和更长的病程(传统机器学习:t = 6.5, P < 0.001;深度学习:t = 5.8, P < 0.001)。在临床相关性或效果测量方面没有发现显著的模型间差异,但在几种扫描仪之间发现传统机器学习衍生的脑年龄估计存在显著差异。我们的研究表明,深度学习衍生的脑年龄与临床残疾显着相关,与传统的机器学习衍生的脑年龄测量同样表现良好,并且可以抵消扫描仪的可变性。
Brain age in multiple sclerosis: a study with deep learning and traditional machine learning.
'Brain age' is a numerical estimate of the biological age of the brain and an overall effort to measure neurodegeneration, regardless of disease type. In multiple sclerosis, accelerated brain ageing has been linked to disability accrual. Artificial intelligence has emerged as a promising tool for the assessment and quantification of the impact of neurodegenerative diseases. Despite the existence of numerous AI models, there is a noticeable lack of comparative imaging data for traditional machine learning versus deep learning in conditions such as multiple sclerosis. A retrospective observational study was initiated to analyse clinical and MRI data (4584 MRIs) from various scanners in a large longitudinal cohort (n = 1516) of people with multiple sclerosis collected from two institutions (Karolinska Institute and Oslo University Hospital) using a uniform data post-processing pipeline. We conducted a comparative assessment of brain age using a deep learning simple fully convolutional network and a well-established traditional machine learning model. This study was primarily aimed to validate the deep learning brain age model in multiple sclerosis. The correlation between estimated brain age and chronological age was stronger for the deep learning estimates (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) than the traditional machine learning estimates (r = 0.75, P < 0.001). An increase in brain age was significantly associated with higher expanded disability status scale scores (traditional machine learning: t = 5.3, P < 0.001; deep learning: t = 3.7, P < 0.001) and longer disease duration (traditional machine learning: t = 6.5, P < 0.001; deep learning: t = 5.8, P < 0.001). No significant inter-model difference in clinical correlation or effect measure was found, but significant differences for traditional machine learning-derived brain age estimates were found between several scanners. Our study suggests that the deep learning-derived brain age is significantly associated with clinical disability, performed equally well to the traditional machine learning-derived brain age measures, and may counteract scanner variability.