胎儿超声心动图的适应症:基于证据的国家和国际指南的共识和争议。

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 ACOUSTICS
Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-10 DOI:10.1002/uog.29224
V De Robertis, T Stampalija, A Z Abuhamad, M Bosco, R Chaoui, C Formigoni, A J Moon-Grady, D Paladini, G Pilu, I G Ramezzana, J Rychik, P Volpe
{"title":"胎儿超声心动图的适应症:基于证据的国家和国际指南的共识和争议。","authors":"V De Robertis, T Stampalija, A Z Abuhamad, M Bosco, R Chaoui, C Formigoni, A J Moon-Grady, D Paladini, G Pilu, I G Ramezzana, J Rychik, P Volpe","doi":"10.1002/uog.29224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal echocardiography (FE) is an indication-driven examination for pregnant women with a fetus at high risk for congenital heart disease (CHD). Several familial, maternal and fetal factors are reported to increase the risk of CHD. The aim of this study was to highlight the existing differences in recommended indications for FE among recently published guidelines and consensuses of experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guidelines and expert consensuses published from January 2008 to October 2023 were identified through a systematic literature search. FE guidelines and consensus statements were excluded if not written in the English language and if indications for FE were not reported. All familial, maternal and fetal risk factors for CHD reported in the consensuses and guidelines were listed and comparisons were made between documents. The agreement or disagreement for each risk factor between guidelines and consensuses was classified as: complete agreement (all analyzed documents reported the same indication); partial agreement (all documents considered a risk factor as an indication, but with inconsistency in its definition); or complete disagreement (inconsistency between documents for the considered risk factor as an indication).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six guidelines and expert consensuses that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Overall, a total of 17 risk factors were identified as an indication for FE. Complete agreement was reached for 3/17 (17.6%) risk factors, all of which are fetal risk factors (suspected CHD at the anomaly scan, presence of major fetal extracardiac abnormality and non-immune hydrops fetalis). Partial agreement was recorded for 8/17 (47.1%) risk factors (family history of CHD, increased nuchal translucency, multiple gestation, maternal diabetes mellitus, maternal phenylketonuria, maternal infection, maternal autoimmune disease and autoantibody positivity, and teratogen exposure). Complete disagreement was recorded for 6/17 (35.3%) risk factors (inherited genetic disease associated with CHD, fetal genetic anomaly, suspected abnormality of heart rate or rhythm, first-trimester sonographic markers of CHD, abnormality of umbilical cord and venous system, and use of assisted reproductive technology).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Areas of controversy regarding which CHD risk factors warrant FE were greater in quantity than were the areas of consensus. An internationally standardized agreement would be valuable for physicians and guideline developers. For many risk factors, further evidence is needed to justify their use as an indication for FE. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":23454,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"682-693"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indications for fetal echocardiography: consensus and controversies among evidence-based national and international guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"V De Robertis, T Stampalija, A Z Abuhamad, M Bosco, R Chaoui, C Formigoni, A J Moon-Grady, D Paladini, G Pilu, I G Ramezzana, J Rychik, P Volpe\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/uog.29224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Fetal echocardiography (FE) is an indication-driven examination for pregnant women with a fetus at high risk for congenital heart disease (CHD). Several familial, maternal and fetal factors are reported to increase the risk of CHD. The aim of this study was to highlight the existing differences in recommended indications for FE among recently published guidelines and consensuses of experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Guidelines and expert consensuses published from January 2008 to October 2023 were identified through a systematic literature search. FE guidelines and consensus statements were excluded if not written in the English language and if indications for FE were not reported. All familial, maternal and fetal risk factors for CHD reported in the consensuses and guidelines were listed and comparisons were made between documents. The agreement or disagreement for each risk factor between guidelines and consensuses was classified as: complete agreement (all analyzed documents reported the same indication); partial agreement (all documents considered a risk factor as an indication, but with inconsistency in its definition); or complete disagreement (inconsistency between documents for the considered risk factor as an indication).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six guidelines and expert consensuses that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Overall, a total of 17 risk factors were identified as an indication for FE. Complete agreement was reached for 3/17 (17.6%) risk factors, all of which are fetal risk factors (suspected CHD at the anomaly scan, presence of major fetal extracardiac abnormality and non-immune hydrops fetalis). Partial agreement was recorded for 8/17 (47.1%) risk factors (family history of CHD, increased nuchal translucency, multiple gestation, maternal diabetes mellitus, maternal phenylketonuria, maternal infection, maternal autoimmune disease and autoantibody positivity, and teratogen exposure). Complete disagreement was recorded for 6/17 (35.3%) risk factors (inherited genetic disease associated with CHD, fetal genetic anomaly, suspected abnormality of heart rate or rhythm, first-trimester sonographic markers of CHD, abnormality of umbilical cord and venous system, and use of assisted reproductive technology).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Areas of controversy regarding which CHD risk factors warrant FE were greater in quantity than were the areas of consensus. An internationally standardized agreement would be valuable for physicians and guideline developers. For many risk factors, further evidence is needed to justify their use as an indication for FE. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"682-693\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29224\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29224","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:胎儿超声心动图(FE)是先天性心脏病(CHD)高危孕妇的指征驱动检查。据报道,一些家族、母体和胎儿因素会增加冠心病的风险。本研究的目的是强调在最近发表的指南和专家共识中推荐的FE适应症存在的差异。方法:系统检索2008年1月至2023年10月发表的指南和专家共识。如果不是用英语写的,如果没有报告FE的适应症,则排除FE指南和共识声明。列出共识和指南中报告的所有家族性、母体和胎儿冠心病危险因素,并进行文献间比较。指南和共识之间对每个风险因素的一致或不一致分为:完全一致(所有分析的文件报告了相同的适应症);部分一致(所有文件都被视为风险因素,但其定义不一致);或完全不一致(被考虑的风险因素作为指示的文件之间不一致)。结果:确定了符合纳入标准的六个指南和专家共识。总的来说,共有17个危险因素被确定为FE的指征。3/17(17.6%)的危险因素完全一致,均为胎儿危险因素(异常扫描怀疑冠心病、存在主要胎儿心外异常和非免疫性积水)。8/17(47.1%)危险因素(CHD家族史、颈部透明度增高、多胎妊娠、母体糖尿病、母体苯丙酮尿、母体感染、母体自身免疫性疾病和自身抗体阳性、致畸原暴露)部分一致。6/17(35.3%)的危险因素(与冠心病相关的遗传疾病、胎儿遗传异常、疑似心率或节律异常、妊娠早期冠心病超声标记物、脐带和静脉系统异常、辅助生殖技术的使用)完全不一致。结论:关于哪些冠心病危险因素需要FE的争议领域在数量上大于共识领域。一个国际标准化的协议对医生和指南的制定者来说是有价值的。对于许多危险因素,需要进一步的证据来证明将其作为FE的指征是合理的。©2025国际妇产科超声学会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Indications for fetal echocardiography: consensus and controversies among evidence-based national and international guidelines.

Objective: Fetal echocardiography (FE) is an indication-driven examination for pregnant women with a fetus at high risk for congenital heart disease (CHD). Several familial, maternal and fetal factors are reported to increase the risk of CHD. The aim of this study was to highlight the existing differences in recommended indications for FE among recently published guidelines and consensuses of experts.

Methods: Guidelines and expert consensuses published from January 2008 to October 2023 were identified through a systematic literature search. FE guidelines and consensus statements were excluded if not written in the English language and if indications for FE were not reported. All familial, maternal and fetal risk factors for CHD reported in the consensuses and guidelines were listed and comparisons were made between documents. The agreement or disagreement for each risk factor between guidelines and consensuses was classified as: complete agreement (all analyzed documents reported the same indication); partial agreement (all documents considered a risk factor as an indication, but with inconsistency in its definition); or complete disagreement (inconsistency between documents for the considered risk factor as an indication).

Results: Six guidelines and expert consensuses that met the inclusion criteria were identified. Overall, a total of 17 risk factors were identified as an indication for FE. Complete agreement was reached for 3/17 (17.6%) risk factors, all of which are fetal risk factors (suspected CHD at the anomaly scan, presence of major fetal extracardiac abnormality and non-immune hydrops fetalis). Partial agreement was recorded for 8/17 (47.1%) risk factors (family history of CHD, increased nuchal translucency, multiple gestation, maternal diabetes mellitus, maternal phenylketonuria, maternal infection, maternal autoimmune disease and autoantibody positivity, and teratogen exposure). Complete disagreement was recorded for 6/17 (35.3%) risk factors (inherited genetic disease associated with CHD, fetal genetic anomaly, suspected abnormality of heart rate or rhythm, first-trimester sonographic markers of CHD, abnormality of umbilical cord and venous system, and use of assisted reproductive technology).

Conclusions: Areas of controversy regarding which CHD risk factors warrant FE were greater in quantity than were the areas of consensus. An internationally standardized agreement would be valuable for physicians and guideline developers. For many risk factors, further evidence is needed to justify their use as an indication for FE. © 2025 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
14.10%
发文量
891
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology (UOG) is the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) and is considered the foremost international peer-reviewed journal in the field. It publishes cutting-edge research that is highly relevant to clinical practice, which includes guidelines, expert commentaries, consensus statements, original articles, and systematic reviews. UOG is widely recognized and included in prominent abstract and indexing databases such as Index Medicus and Current Contents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信