腹股沟疝机器人经腹腹膜前修补术的早期疗效:一位外科医生的经验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ramkaran Chaudhary, Akshat Dutt, Indra Singh Choudhary, Anupam Singh Chauhan, Aditya Baksi, Naveen Sharma
{"title":"腹股沟疝机器人经腹腹膜前修补术的早期疗效:一位外科医生的经验。","authors":"Ramkaran Chaudhary, Akshat Dutt, Indra Singh Choudhary, Anupam Singh Chauhan, Aditya Baksi, Naveen Sharma","doi":"10.4103/jmas.jmas_221_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair are becoming more popular due to their advantages over open surgery. These techniques aim to strengthen weakened tissue and result in reduced complications, shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. Robotic surgery provides better visualisation and ergonomics for surgeons and less post-operative pain for patients. This study evaluates the early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias. Patients with ventral or umbilical hernias were excluded. Data on patient and hernia characteristics, surgical details and outcomes were collected and analysed. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia, with specific port placements. A mesh was used to cover the hernia defect the patients were followed up after discharge telephonically as well as through scheduled visits to the clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias between November 2019 and March 2023. The majority of patients were males (97.78%). The average age was 48.2 years. Most of the patients (80%) had unilateral defects. Only one patient had a recurrent hernia. The average operative time was 140 min. The complications were minimal. Three patients had post-operative seroma, and one had a repaired vas deferens injury with no adverse symptoms or fertility issues post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTAPP is a safe and feasible modality for treating inguinal hernias. It also offers a better three-dimensional visualisation of anatomy, thereby reducing complications due to faulty technique. It may serve as the procedure of choice for young surgeons seeking to learn robotic skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":48905,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: A single surgeon's experience.\",\"authors\":\"Ramkaran Chaudhary, Akshat Dutt, Indra Singh Choudhary, Anupam Singh Chauhan, Aditya Baksi, Naveen Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jmas.jmas_221_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair are becoming more popular due to their advantages over open surgery. These techniques aim to strengthen weakened tissue and result in reduced complications, shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. Robotic surgery provides better visualisation and ergonomics for surgeons and less post-operative pain for patients. This study evaluates the early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias. Patients with ventral or umbilical hernias were excluded. Data on patient and hernia characteristics, surgical details and outcomes were collected and analysed. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia, with specific port placements. A mesh was used to cover the hernia defect the patients were followed up after discharge telephonically as well as through scheduled visits to the clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias between November 2019 and March 2023. The majority of patients were males (97.78%). The average age was 48.2 years. Most of the patients (80%) had unilateral defects. Only one patient had a recurrent hernia. The average operative time was 140 min. The complications were minimal. Three patients had post-operative seroma, and one had a repaired vas deferens injury with no adverse symptoms or fertility issues post-surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>rTAPP is a safe and feasible modality for treating inguinal hernias. It also offers a better three-dimensional visualisation of anatomy, thereby reducing complications due to faulty technique. It may serve as the procedure of choice for young surgeons seeking to learn robotic skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48905,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_221_23\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimal Access Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jmas.jmas_221_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创技术在腹股沟疝修补中越来越受欢迎,因为它比开放手术更有优势。这些技术旨在加强脆弱的组织,减少并发症,缩短住院时间,加快康复。机器人手术为外科医生提供了更好的视觉效果和人体工程学,减少了患者的术后疼痛。本研究评估了机器人经腹腹膜前修补术(rTAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的早期结果。患者和方法:本研究包括接受rTAPP治疗腹股沟疝的患者。腹疝或脐疝患者被排除在外。收集和分析患者和疝气特征、手术细节和结果的数据。该手术在全身麻醉下进行,有特定的端口放置。使用补片覆盖疝缺损,出院后电话随访患者,并定期到诊所就诊。结果:2019年11月至2023年3月,45例患者接受了rTAPP治疗腹股沟疝。患者以男性居多(97.78%)。平均年龄为48.2岁。大多数患者(80%)有单侧缺陷。只有一个病人有复发性疝气。平均手术时间140分钟,并发症极少。3例患者术后出现血肿,1例患者输精管损伤修复,术后无不良症状或生育问题。结论:rTAPP是一种安全可行的治疗腹股沟疝的方法。它还提供了更好的三维解剖可视化,从而减少了由于技术错误造成的并发症。对于想要学习机器人技术的年轻外科医生来说,它可能是首选的手术方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of inguinal hernias: A single surgeon's experience.

Introduction: Minimally invasive techniques for inguinal hernia repair are becoming more popular due to their advantages over open surgery. These techniques aim to strengthen weakened tissue and result in reduced complications, shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. Robotic surgery provides better visualisation and ergonomics for surgeons and less post-operative pain for patients. This study evaluates the early outcomes of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (rTAPP) for inguinal hernia.

Patients and methods: The study included patients who underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias. Patients with ventral or umbilical hernias were excluded. Data on patient and hernia characteristics, surgical details and outcomes were collected and analysed. The procedure was performed under general anaesthesia, with specific port placements. A mesh was used to cover the hernia defect the patients were followed up after discharge telephonically as well as through scheduled visits to the clinics.

Results: Forty-five patients underwent rTAPP for inguinal hernias between November 2019 and March 2023. The majority of patients were males (97.78%). The average age was 48.2 years. Most of the patients (80%) had unilateral defects. Only one patient had a recurrent hernia. The average operative time was 140 min. The complications were minimal. Three patients had post-operative seroma, and one had a repaired vas deferens injury with no adverse symptoms or fertility issues post-surgery.

Conclusion: rTAPP is a safe and feasible modality for treating inguinal hernias. It also offers a better three-dimensional visualisation of anatomy, thereby reducing complications due to faulty technique. It may serve as the procedure of choice for young surgeons seeking to learn robotic skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Minimal Access Surgery (JMAS), the official publication of Indian Association of Gastrointestinal Endo Surgeons, launched in early 2005. The JMAS, a quarterly publication, is the first English-language journal from India, as also from this part of the world, dedicated to Minimal Access Surgery. The JMAS boasts an outstanding editorial board comprising of Indian and international experts in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信