TRIPED-GM儿科分诊系统的可重复性。

M Concepción Míguez-Navarro, Gloria Guerrero-Márquez, Carmen Ignacio Cerro
{"title":"TRIPED-GM儿科分诊系统的可重复性。","authors":"M Concepción Míguez-Navarro, Gloria Guerrero-Márquez, Carmen Ignacio Cerro","doi":"10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The triage system aims to determine the level of urgency of patients in order to provide appropriate care and reduce morbidity and mortality. It is essential that the system used is valid, reliable and easy to use. The TRIPED-GM system is a five-level classification system exclusively for pediatric age, which includes six steps, three of which are mandatory (PAT, guiding sign/symptom, and priority rectifiers).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the reproducibility of the TRIPED-GM system when used on patients evaluated consecutively by 2 nurses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 237 patients under 16 years of age who attended a third-level pediatric emergency service. Reliability was measured using Kappa (κ), linear Kappa (κp), and quadratic Kappa (κp<sup>2</sup>) indices, which compared the priority assigned by two research nurses and sixteen paediatric emergency nurses with over a year of experience in triage. Patients were classified consecutively and blindly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was agreement in 221 (93.2%) patients. The overall concordance was: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), κp = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92), κp<sup>2</sup> = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92). There were no differences in the assignment of more than one priority level in any patient. Concordance in the mandatory steps was: Pediatric Assessment Triangle: κ = 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.96), Main reason for consultation: κ = 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), Rectifiers: κ = 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1). Concordance was higher in patients who consulted for illness compared to those for trauma/accidents: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.92) vs. κ = 0.79 (95% CI 0.57-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TRIPED-GM pediatric triage system is reliable for use in emergency services with patients of similar characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":72917,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","volume":" ","pages":"502191"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reproducibility of the TRIPED-GM paediatric triage system.\",\"authors\":\"M Concepción Míguez-Navarro, Gloria Guerrero-Márquez, Carmen Ignacio Cerro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The triage system aims to determine the level of urgency of patients in order to provide appropriate care and reduce morbidity and mortality. It is essential that the system used is valid, reliable and easy to use. The TRIPED-GM system is a five-level classification system exclusively for pediatric age, which includes six steps, three of which are mandatory (PAT, guiding sign/symptom, and priority rectifiers).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the reproducibility of the TRIPED-GM system when used on patients evaluated consecutively by 2 nurses.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 237 patients under 16 years of age who attended a third-level pediatric emergency service. Reliability was measured using Kappa (κ), linear Kappa (κp), and quadratic Kappa (κp<sup>2</sup>) indices, which compared the priority assigned by two research nurses and sixteen paediatric emergency nurses with over a year of experience in triage. Patients were classified consecutively and blindly.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was agreement in 221 (93.2%) patients. The overall concordance was: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), κp = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92), κp<sup>2</sup> = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92). There were no differences in the assignment of more than one priority level in any patient. Concordance in the mandatory steps was: Pediatric Assessment Triangle: κ = 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.96), Main reason for consultation: κ = 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), Rectifiers: κ = 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1). Concordance was higher in patients who consulted for illness compared to those for trauma/accidents: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.92) vs. κ = 0.79 (95% CI 0.57-1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TRIPED-GM pediatric triage system is reliable for use in emergency services with patients of similar characteristics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72917,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"502191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria clinica (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfcle.2025.502191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:分诊系统旨在确定患者的紧急程度,以便提供适当的护理,降低发病率和死亡率。系统的有效性、可靠性和易用性是至关重要的。TRIPED-GM系统是一个专门针对儿童年龄的五级分类系统,包括六个步骤,其中三个是强制性的(PAT,指导性体征/症状和优先纠正)。目的:探讨TRIPED-GM系统在两名护士连续评价患者时的可重复性。方法:观察性、描述性、横断面研究,纳入237例16岁以下的三级儿科急诊患者。信度采用Kappa (K)、线性Kappa (KP)和二次Kappa (Kp2)指数进行测量,这些指数比较了两名研究护士和16名具有一年以上分诊经验的儿科急诊护士分配的优先级。患者按顺序盲目分类。结果:221例(93.2%)患者的结论一致。总体一致性为:K = 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), KP = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92), Kp2 = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92)。在任何患者中,分配一个以上的优先级没有差异。强制性步骤的一致性为:儿科评估三角:K = 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.96),主要咨询原因:K = 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.89),纠正措施:K = 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1)。与创伤/事故患者相比,疾病患者的一致性更高:K = 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.92) vs. K = 0.79 (95% CI 0.57-1)。结论:TRIPED-GM儿科分诊系统在具有相似特征的患者急诊服务中是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reproducibility of the TRIPED-GM paediatric triage system.

Introduction: The triage system aims to determine the level of urgency of patients in order to provide appropriate care and reduce morbidity and mortality. It is essential that the system used is valid, reliable and easy to use. The TRIPED-GM system is a five-level classification system exclusively for pediatric age, which includes six steps, three of which are mandatory (PAT, guiding sign/symptom, and priority rectifiers).

Objective: To determine the reproducibility of the TRIPED-GM system when used on patients evaluated consecutively by 2 nurses.

Method: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study involving 237 patients under 16 years of age who attended a third-level pediatric emergency service. Reliability was measured using Kappa (κ), linear Kappa (κp), and quadratic Kappa (κp2) indices, which compared the priority assigned by two research nurses and sixteen paediatric emergency nurses with over a year of experience in triage. Patients were classified consecutively and blindly.

Results: There was agreement in 221 (93.2%) patients. The overall concordance was: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.77-0.91), κp = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92), κp2 = 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92). There were no differences in the assignment of more than one priority level in any patient. Concordance in the mandatory steps was: Pediatric Assessment Triangle: κ = 0.82 (95% CI 0.68-0.96), Main reason for consultation: κ = 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.89), Rectifiers: κ = 0.94 (95% CI 0.88-1). Concordance was higher in patients who consulted for illness compared to those for trauma/accidents: κ = 0.84 (95% CI 0.76-0.92) vs. κ = 0.79 (95% CI 0.57-1).

Conclusion: The TRIPED-GM pediatric triage system is reliable for use in emergency services with patients of similar characteristics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信