寻求庇护者和在难民综合保健服务机构接受健康检查的难民中纳纳啮齿鼠的感染率。

Kieran Killington, Nicky Longley, Katherine Bowers, Humayra Chowdhury, Paola Cinardo, Laura Nabarro, Sarah Eisen
{"title":"寻求庇护者和在难民综合保健服务机构接受健康检查的难民中纳纳啮齿鼠的感染率。","authors":"Kieran Killington, Nicky Longley, Katherine Bowers, Humayra Chowdhury, Paola Cinardo, Laura Nabarro, Sarah Eisen","doi":"10.1186/s44263-025-00159-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rodentolepis (Hymenolepis) nana (R. nana) is the most common cestode to infect humans, and whilst most infections are asymptomatic, those with a high burden of infection can present with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, or growth stunting. The Respond service, London, offers screening and treatment for common infections to people seeking asylum and refugees (PSAR), including testing for gastrointestinal parasites such as R. nana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a retrospective observational analysis of all positive R. nana results in patients screened by the Respond service between April 2016 and July 2023. A positive result was defined by the presence of R. nana ova on stool microscopy for ova, cysts and parasites (OCP) or R. nana DNA detection using the Novodiag® Stool Parasite assay (NSP), a cartridge based multiplex molecular assay. We explore incidence of R. nana infection and efficacy of treatment in PSAR presenting to an integrated refugee health service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R. nana was identified in 54/1797 (3%) of patients who had a stool sample collected in the Respond service. Median age of patients was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 9-17), and 38/54 (70%) were male, reflecting the sex demographic of the cohort. Coinfection with other parasites occurred in 28/54 (52%) of the cohort. Of the 27 patients who tested positive for R. nana where their family members were also tested, 11 patients (41%) had family members who were also infected with R. nana. Treatment failure (defined as failure to clear R. nana detected by OCP/NSP after treatment with praziquantel) occurred in 43% of the patients for whom a clearance sample was returned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show a significant prevalence of R. nana in people seeking asylum screened within the Respond cohort. We show significant clustering within family units and a relatively high treatment failure rate. We propose prompt treatment of positive cases to prevent transmission within families, and consideration of treatment of family units simultaneously to prevent re-infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":519903,"journal":{"name":"BMC global and public health","volume":"3 1","pages":"45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidence of Rodentolepis nana infection within people seeking asylum and refugees attending health screening at an integrated refugee health service.\",\"authors\":\"Kieran Killington, Nicky Longley, Katherine Bowers, Humayra Chowdhury, Paola Cinardo, Laura Nabarro, Sarah Eisen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s44263-025-00159-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rodentolepis (Hymenolepis) nana (R. nana) is the most common cestode to infect humans, and whilst most infections are asymptomatic, those with a high burden of infection can present with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, or growth stunting. The Respond service, London, offers screening and treatment for common infections to people seeking asylum and refugees (PSAR), including testing for gastrointestinal parasites such as R. nana.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We present a retrospective observational analysis of all positive R. nana results in patients screened by the Respond service between April 2016 and July 2023. A positive result was defined by the presence of R. nana ova on stool microscopy for ova, cysts and parasites (OCP) or R. nana DNA detection using the Novodiag® Stool Parasite assay (NSP), a cartridge based multiplex molecular assay. We explore incidence of R. nana infection and efficacy of treatment in PSAR presenting to an integrated refugee health service.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>R. nana was identified in 54/1797 (3%) of patients who had a stool sample collected in the Respond service. Median age of patients was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 9-17), and 38/54 (70%) were male, reflecting the sex demographic of the cohort. Coinfection with other parasites occurred in 28/54 (52%) of the cohort. Of the 27 patients who tested positive for R. nana where their family members were also tested, 11 patients (41%) had family members who were also infected with R. nana. Treatment failure (defined as failure to clear R. nana detected by OCP/NSP after treatment with praziquantel) occurred in 43% of the patients for whom a clearance sample was returned.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We show a significant prevalence of R. nana in people seeking asylum screened within the Respond cohort. We show significant clustering within family units and a relatively high treatment failure rate. We propose prompt treatment of positive cases to prevent transmission within families, and consideration of treatment of family units simultaneously to prevent re-infection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519903,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12076953/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC global and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00159-5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC global and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s44263-025-00159-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:大鼠耳绦虫(膜孔绦虫)是感染人类最常见的寄生虫,虽然大多数感染是无症状的,但感染负担高的人可出现腹痛、腹泻或生长发育迟缓。伦敦的响应服务为寻求庇护和难民(PSAR)的人提供常见感染的筛查和治疗,包括检测胃肠道寄生虫,如奈纳氏弧菌。方法:我们对2016年4月至2023年7月期间通过应答服务筛选的所有阳性R. nana患者进行回顾性观察分析。通过粪便显微镜检测卵、囊肿和寄生虫(OCP)或使用Novodiag®粪便寄生虫检测(NSP)(一种基于药筒的多重分子检测)检测娜娜疟原虫的DNA,确定阳性结果。我们探讨了在难民综合卫生服务中出现的急性呼吸道感染的发生率和治疗效果。结果:在应答服务收集的粪便样本中,54/1797(3%)的患者中鉴定出了娜娜乳杆菌。患者年龄中位数为15岁(四分位数间距[IQR] 9-17),男性38/54(70%),反映了该队列的性别人口统计学特征。同时感染其他寄生虫者占28/54(52%)。在27例娜娜R.检测呈阳性的患者及其家人也接受了检测,其中11例患者(41%)的家人也感染了娜娜R.。治疗失败(定义为在使用吡喹酮治疗后,OCP/NSP检测到的娜娜型血吸虫未能清除)在返回清除样本的患者中占43%。结论:我们显示,在应答队列中筛选的寻求庇护的人中,娜娜弧菌的患病率很高。我们在家庭单位内显示出显著的聚类和相对较高的治疗失败率。我们建议及时治疗阳性病例,以防止家庭内传播,并考虑同时治疗家庭单位,以防止再次感染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Incidence of Rodentolepis nana infection within people seeking asylum and refugees attending health screening at an integrated refugee health service.

Background: Rodentolepis (Hymenolepis) nana (R. nana) is the most common cestode to infect humans, and whilst most infections are asymptomatic, those with a high burden of infection can present with abdominal pain, diarrhoea, or growth stunting. The Respond service, London, offers screening and treatment for common infections to people seeking asylum and refugees (PSAR), including testing for gastrointestinal parasites such as R. nana.

Methods: We present a retrospective observational analysis of all positive R. nana results in patients screened by the Respond service between April 2016 and July 2023. A positive result was defined by the presence of R. nana ova on stool microscopy for ova, cysts and parasites (OCP) or R. nana DNA detection using the Novodiag® Stool Parasite assay (NSP), a cartridge based multiplex molecular assay. We explore incidence of R. nana infection and efficacy of treatment in PSAR presenting to an integrated refugee health service.

Results: R. nana was identified in 54/1797 (3%) of patients who had a stool sample collected in the Respond service. Median age of patients was 15 years (interquartile range [IQR] 9-17), and 38/54 (70%) were male, reflecting the sex demographic of the cohort. Coinfection with other parasites occurred in 28/54 (52%) of the cohort. Of the 27 patients who tested positive for R. nana where their family members were also tested, 11 patients (41%) had family members who were also infected with R. nana. Treatment failure (defined as failure to clear R. nana detected by OCP/NSP after treatment with praziquantel) occurred in 43% of the patients for whom a clearance sample was returned.

Conclusions: We show a significant prevalence of R. nana in people seeking asylum screened within the Respond cohort. We show significant clustering within family units and a relatively high treatment failure rate. We propose prompt treatment of positive cases to prevent transmission within families, and consideration of treatment of family units simultaneously to prevent re-infection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信