TIPS与内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射治疗胃底静脉曲张再出血:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。

IF 2.4 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Junyuan Zhu, Yifu Xia, Guangchuan Wang, Guangjun Huang, Mingyan Zhang, Zhen Li, Chunqing Zhang
{"title":"TIPS与内镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射治疗胃底静脉曲张再出血:一项倾向评分匹配的回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Junyuan Zhu, Yifu Xia, Guangchuan Wang, Guangjun Huang, Mingyan Zhang, Zhen Li, Chunqing Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-11761-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy for preventing rebleeding with gastroesophageal varices type 2 (GOV2) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1) is unclear. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) on GOV2 and IGV1 varices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from patients with cirrhosis with GOV2 and IGV1 varices who received TIPS or ECI treatment between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, and the secondary endpoints were death and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). Propensity score matching (PSM) and adjusted survival curves were used to assess the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 eligible patients were included, of whom, 35 patients received TIPS and 76 patients received ECI. The median follow-up time for the TIPS and ECI groups were 746 and 683 days, respectively. TIPS reduced the all-cause rebleeding rate (14.3% versus 33.8%, p = 0.033; after PSM, 16.7% versus 40.0%, p = 0.045) compared with ECI, with lower risk of ectopic embolism (all were in the ECI group). The Incidence of OHE in the TIPS group was higher than that in the ECI group (28.6% versus 1.4%, p < 0.001; after PSM, 33.3% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in mortality (17.1% versus 12.2%, p = 0.684; after PSM, 16.7% versus 16.7%, p = 1.000). The results were not affected by the adjusted survival curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIPS was more effective than ECI in preventing rebleeding in patients with GOV2 and IGV1 varices with similar survival rates and lower risk of ectopic embolism, although TIPS was associated with a higher incidence of OHE.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"3662-3670"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TIPS versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric fundal variceal rebleeding: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Junyuan Zhu, Yifu Xia, Guangchuan Wang, Guangjun Huang, Mingyan Zhang, Zhen Li, Chunqing Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00464-025-11761-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal strategy for preventing rebleeding with gastroesophageal varices type 2 (GOV2) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1) is unclear. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) on GOV2 and IGV1 varices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from patients with cirrhosis with GOV2 and IGV1 varices who received TIPS or ECI treatment between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, and the secondary endpoints were death and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). Propensity score matching (PSM) and adjusted survival curves were used to assess the robustness of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 111 eligible patients were included, of whom, 35 patients received TIPS and 76 patients received ECI. The median follow-up time for the TIPS and ECI groups were 746 and 683 days, respectively. TIPS reduced the all-cause rebleeding rate (14.3% versus 33.8%, p = 0.033; after PSM, 16.7% versus 40.0%, p = 0.045) compared with ECI, with lower risk of ectopic embolism (all were in the ECI group). The Incidence of OHE in the TIPS group was higher than that in the ECI group (28.6% versus 1.4%, p < 0.001; after PSM, 33.3% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in mortality (17.1% versus 12.2%, p = 0.684; after PSM, 16.7% versus 16.7%, p = 1.000). The results were not affected by the adjusted survival curve.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TIPS was more effective than ECI in preventing rebleeding in patients with GOV2 and IGV1 varices with similar survival rates and lower risk of ectopic embolism, although TIPS was associated with a higher incidence of OHE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"3662-3670\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11761-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11761-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预防胃食管静脉曲张2型(GOV2)和孤立性胃静脉曲张1型(IGV1)再出血的最佳策略尚不清楚。在这项回顾性研究中,我们旨在比较经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流术(TIPS)和内窥镜下氰基丙烯酸酯注射(ECI)治疗GOV2和IGV1静脉曲张的有效性和安全性。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们收集了2018年6月至2023年6月期间接受TIPS或ECI治疗的肝硬化合并GOV2和IGV1静脉曲张患者的数据。主要终点是再出血,次要终点是死亡和显性肝性脑病(OHE)。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)和调整后的生存曲线来评估结果的稳健性。结果:共纳入111例符合条件的患者,其中TIPS 35例,ECI 76例。TIPS组和ECI组的中位随访时间分别为746天和683天。TIPS降低了全因再出血率(14.3% vs 33.8%, p = 0.033;PSM后(16.7% vs 40.0%, p = 0.045)与ECI相比,异位栓塞的风险更低(均为ECI组)。TIPS组OHE发生率高于ECI组(28.6% vs . 1.4%)。结论:TIPS在预防GOV2和IGV1静脉曲张患者再出血方面比ECI更有效,生存率相似,异位栓塞风险更低,尽管TIPS与较高的OHE发生率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TIPS versus endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for the treatment of gastric fundal variceal rebleeding: a propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study.

Background: The optimal strategy for preventing rebleeding with gastroesophageal varices type 2 (GOV2) and isolated gastric varices type 1 (IGV1) is unclear. In this retrospective study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection (ECI) on GOV2 and IGV1 varices.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we collected data from patients with cirrhosis with GOV2 and IGV1 varices who received TIPS or ECI treatment between June 2018 and June 2023. The primary endpoint was rebleeding, and the secondary endpoints were death and overt hepatic encephalopathy (OHE). Propensity score matching (PSM) and adjusted survival curves were used to assess the robustness of the results.

Results: A total of 111 eligible patients were included, of whom, 35 patients received TIPS and 76 patients received ECI. The median follow-up time for the TIPS and ECI groups were 746 and 683 days, respectively. TIPS reduced the all-cause rebleeding rate (14.3% versus 33.8%, p = 0.033; after PSM, 16.7% versus 40.0%, p = 0.045) compared with ECI, with lower risk of ectopic embolism (all were in the ECI group). The Incidence of OHE in the TIPS group was higher than that in the ECI group (28.6% versus 1.4%, p < 0.001; after PSM, 33.3% versus 3.3%, p < 0.001). However, no significant difference was found in mortality (17.1% versus 12.2%, p = 0.684; after PSM, 16.7% versus 16.7%, p = 1.000). The results were not affected by the adjusted survival curve.

Conclusion: TIPS was more effective than ECI in preventing rebleeding in patients with GOV2 and IGV1 varices with similar survival rates and lower risk of ectopic embolism, although TIPS was associated with a higher incidence of OHE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信