{"title":"重症监护护士使用非药物疼痛管理方法的相关因素:多项logistic回归分析。","authors":"Ayşe Gül Parlak, Yeliz Akkuş","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70039"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with Intensive care nurses' use of non-pharmacological methods of pain management: A multinomial logistic regression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Gül Parlak, Yeliz Akkuş\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"e70039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factors associated with Intensive care nurses' use of non-pharmacological methods of pain management: A multinomial logistic regression analysis.
Background: Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.
Aim: This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.
Study design: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.
Results: It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).
Conclusion: Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.
Relevance to clinical practice: There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.
期刊介绍:
Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics.
Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories:
-research reports
-literature reviews
-developments in practice, education or management
-reflections on practice