重症监护护士使用非药物疼痛管理方法的相关因素:多项logistic回归分析。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ayşe Gül Parlak, Yeliz Akkuş
{"title":"重症监护护士使用非药物疼痛管理方法的相关因素:多项logistic回归分析。","authors":"Ayşe Gül Parlak, Yeliz Akkuş","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 3","pages":"e70039"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with Intensive care nurses' use of non-pharmacological methods of pain management: A multinomial logistic regression analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ayşe Gül Parlak, Yeliz Akkuş\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 3\",\"pages\":\"e70039\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然文献中有大量关于护士在疼痛管理中的角色、使用的方法和态度的研究,但与使用非药物方法(npm)相关的因素并没有得到很好的记录。目的:本研究旨在确定土耳其重症监护护士使用npm的相关因素。研究设计:这项描述性和横断面研究由385名重症监护室护士参与。在2022年1月至12月期间,通过“社会人口学数据表”、“非药物方法表”和“疼痛信念问卷”(PBQ)收集数据。采用多项logistic回归分析确定与非药物方法相关的因素。疼痛管理分为药物治疗、非药物治疗和两者兼而有之。采用药理学方法(PMs)作为参考范畴。本研究采用STROBE检查表。结果:在ICU的疼痛管理中,33%的患者采用药物方法,62.1%的患者同时采用药物和药物两种方法。使用npm最常见的障碍是“工作量大”(82.9%),“时间不足”(82.9%)和“患者不稳定”(69.6%)。与药理学方法相比,接受疼痛管理培训的护士对npm的使用增加了237% (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707;p = .013)。在使用国家预防措施的障碍方面,与应急做法相比,国家预防措施的优先级较低(RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579;p= 0.000)和资源(材料和设备)不足(RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846;p = .013)减少了npm的使用。心理信念子量表增加了npm的使用(RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152 ~ 3.803;p = .015)。结论:应对护士进行疼痛管理的非药物方法和药物方法的培训,消除非药物方法使用的障碍,改变对疼痛的心理观念。与临床实践的相关性:在重症监护病房护士增加非药物止痛方法的使用中,需要解决缺乏教育、法律障碍和缺乏资源的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with Intensive care nurses' use of non-pharmacological methods of pain management: A multinomial logistic regression analysis.

Background: Although there are numerous studies in the literature on the roles, methods used and attitudes of nurses in pain management, the factors related to the use of non-pharmacological methods (NPMs) are not well-documented.

Aim: This research aims to determine the factors related to the use of NPMs by intensive care nurses in Turkey.

Study design: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 385 intensive care unit nurses. Data were collected by using the 'Sociodemographic Data Form', 'Non-Pharmacological Methods Form' and 'Pain Beliefs Questionnaire' (PBQ) between January-December 2022. Multiple multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with non-pharmacological methods. Pain management was categorized as pharmacological, non-pharmacological and both. The use of pharmacological methods (PMs) was taken as the reference category. The STROBE checklist was adhered to in this study.

Results: It was found that in pain management in the ICU, 33% used pharmacological methods, and 62.1% used both methods. The most frequent barriers experienced in the use of NPMs were 'heavy workload' (82.9%), 'inadequate time' (82.9%) and 'patients being unstable' (69.6%). Receiving pain management training increased the nurses' use of NPMs by 237% compared to pharmacological methods (RRR = 2.377, 95% CI = 1.200-4.707; p = .013). Regarding the barriers to the use of NPMs, 'the lower priority of NPMs compared to emergency practices (RRR=0.333, 95% CI=0.191-0.579; p=.000) and Deficiency in resources (materials and equipment)' (RRR = 0.454, 95% CI = 0.244-0.846; p = .013) decreased the use of NPMs. The Psychological Beliefs subscale of the PBQ increased the use of NPMs (RRR = 2.094, 95% CI = 1.152-3.803; p = .015).

Conclusion: Nurses should be provided with training on non-pharmacological methods as well as pharmacological methods in pain management, barriers to the use of non-pharmacological methods should be eliminated and psychological beliefs regarding pain should also be addressed.

Relevance to clinical practice: There is a need to solve the problems of lack of education, legal barriers and lack of resources in increasing the use of non-pharmacological pain methods by nurses in intensive care units.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信