在一项多中心队列研究中,粘弹性止血试验与死亡率和输血相关。

IF 1.6 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Shyam Murali, Eric Winter, Nicolas M Chanes, Allyson M Hynes, Madhu Subramanian, Alison A Smith, Mark J Seamon, Jeremy W Cannon
{"title":"在一项多中心队列研究中,粘弹性止血试验与死亡率和输血相关。","authors":"Shyam Murali, Eric Winter, Nicolas M Chanes, Allyson M Hynes, Madhu Subramanian, Alison A Smith, Mark J Seamon, Jeremy W Cannon","doi":"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) carries significant risks, including increased mortality. Traditional TIC definitions rely on laboratories that result slowly and do not highlight therapeutic targets. We hypothesized that a TIC score, based on thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), collectively termed viscoelastic hemostatic assays, is associated with in-hospital mortality and packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a database of adult patients undergoing institutional massive transfusion at seven level 1 trauma centers (2013-2018). A \"TIC score\" was developed, with 1 point assigned for abnormal TEG R-time (≥ 9 min) or ROTEM clot time (≥ 80 sec), ɑ-angle (< 65<sup>o</sup>), or maximum amplitude (< 55 mm). TIC+ patients (TIC score 1-3) were compared with TIC- patients (TIC score 0). TIC Score composition and abnormal cutoff values were adjusted to investigate optimal weighting and thresholds. Multiple logistic and negative binomial regression was used to control confounders while evaluating the association between abnormal TIC values, in-hospital mortality, and 24-hour pRBC transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1499 patients in the final analysis, 591 (39.4%) were TIC+. Each 1-point increase in TIC score was associated with a 53% increase in the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.53, 95% CI, 1.33-1.76, <i>P</i> < .001) and a 25% increase in pRBC transfusion volumes (incidence rate ratio, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.16-1.34, <i>P</i> < .001). Abnormal maximum amplitude was associated with both mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.03-2.19, <i>P</i> = .034) and pRBC transfusion volumes (<i>P</i> < .001), whereas abnormal ɑ-angle was associated with mortality (OR, 1.59, 95% CI, 1.09-2.32, <i>P</i> = .015). The unequal weighting of TIC score components and adjustments to normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds were maintained but did not improve the model's predictive power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A viscoelastic hemostatic assay-based TIC score is independently associated with mortality and pRBC transfusion volumes. This association persists with unequal weighting and adjustment of normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds of TEG components.</p>","PeriodicalId":73967,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","volume":"6 2","pages":"100042"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997675/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays are Associated With Mortality and Blood Transfusion in a Multicenter Cohort.\",\"authors\":\"Shyam Murali, Eric Winter, Nicolas M Chanes, Allyson M Hynes, Madhu Subramanian, Alison A Smith, Mark J Seamon, Jeremy W Cannon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) carries significant risks, including increased mortality. Traditional TIC definitions rely on laboratories that result slowly and do not highlight therapeutic targets. We hypothesized that a TIC score, based on thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), collectively termed viscoelastic hemostatic assays, is associated with in-hospital mortality and packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study used a database of adult patients undergoing institutional massive transfusion at seven level 1 trauma centers (2013-2018). A \\\"TIC score\\\" was developed, with 1 point assigned for abnormal TEG R-time (≥ 9 min) or ROTEM clot time (≥ 80 sec), ɑ-angle (< 65<sup>o</sup>), or maximum amplitude (< 55 mm). TIC+ patients (TIC score 1-3) were compared with TIC- patients (TIC score 0). TIC Score composition and abnormal cutoff values were adjusted to investigate optimal weighting and thresholds. Multiple logistic and negative binomial regression was used to control confounders while evaluating the association between abnormal TIC values, in-hospital mortality, and 24-hour pRBC transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1499 patients in the final analysis, 591 (39.4%) were TIC+. Each 1-point increase in TIC score was associated with a 53% increase in the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.53, 95% CI, 1.33-1.76, <i>P</i> < .001) and a 25% increase in pRBC transfusion volumes (incidence rate ratio, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.16-1.34, <i>P</i> < .001). Abnormal maximum amplitude was associated with both mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.03-2.19, <i>P</i> = .034) and pRBC transfusion volumes (<i>P</i> < .001), whereas abnormal ɑ-angle was associated with mortality (OR, 1.59, 95% CI, 1.09-2.32, <i>P</i> = .015). The unequal weighting of TIC score components and adjustments to normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds were maintained but did not improve the model's predictive power.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A viscoelastic hemostatic assay-based TIC score is independently associated with mortality and pRBC transfusion volumes. This association persists with unequal weighting and adjustment of normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds of TEG components.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"100042\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11997675/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acepjo.2024.100042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:创伤性凝血功能障碍(TIC)具有显著的风险,包括死亡率增加。传统的TIC定义依赖于实验室,结果缓慢且不突出治疗靶点。我们假设,基于血栓弹性成像(TEG)和旋转血栓弹性测量(ROTEM)的TIC评分,统称为粘弹性止血测定,与住院死亡率和填充红细胞(pRBC)输血有关。方法:本回顾性队列研究使用了7个一级创伤中心(2013-2018)接受机构大量输血的成年患者的数据库。采用“TIC评分”,对TEG R-time(≥9 min)或ROTEM凝块时间(≥80 sec)、r角(< 65°)或最大振幅异常评分1分。结果:1499例患者中,591例(39.4%)为TIC+。TIC评分每增加1分,死亡率增加53%(优势比[OR], 1.53, 95% CI, 1.33-1.76, P < .001), pRBC输血量增加25%(发病率比,1.25,95% CI, 1.16-1.34, P < .001)。异常的最大振幅与死亡率(OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.03-2.19, P = 0.034)和pRBC输血量(P < 0.001)相关,而异常的弧度角与死亡率相关(OR 1.59, 95% CI, 1.09-2.32, P = 0.015)。TIC评分成分的不平等权重和正常/异常截断阈值的调整保持不变,但并未提高模型的预测能力。结论:基于粘弹性止血试验的TIC评分与死亡率和pRBC输血量独立相关。这种关联持续存在于TEG分量的不平等加权和正常/异常截止阈值的调整中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays are Associated With Mortality and Blood Transfusion in a Multicenter Cohort.

Objectives: Trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) carries significant risks, including increased mortality. Traditional TIC definitions rely on laboratories that result slowly and do not highlight therapeutic targets. We hypothesized that a TIC score, based on thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), collectively termed viscoelastic hemostatic assays, is associated with in-hospital mortality and packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a database of adult patients undergoing institutional massive transfusion at seven level 1 trauma centers (2013-2018). A "TIC score" was developed, with 1 point assigned for abnormal TEG R-time (≥ 9 min) or ROTEM clot time (≥ 80 sec), ɑ-angle (< 65o), or maximum amplitude (< 55 mm). TIC+ patients (TIC score 1-3) were compared with TIC- patients (TIC score 0). TIC Score composition and abnormal cutoff values were adjusted to investigate optimal weighting and thresholds. Multiple logistic and negative binomial regression was used to control confounders while evaluating the association between abnormal TIC values, in-hospital mortality, and 24-hour pRBC transfusion.

Results: Of 1499 patients in the final analysis, 591 (39.4%) were TIC+. Each 1-point increase in TIC score was associated with a 53% increase in the odds of mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.53, 95% CI, 1.33-1.76, P < .001) and a 25% increase in pRBC transfusion volumes (incidence rate ratio, 1.25, 95% CI, 1.16-1.34, P < .001). Abnormal maximum amplitude was associated with both mortality (OR 1.50, 95% CI, 1.03-2.19, P = .034) and pRBC transfusion volumes (P < .001), whereas abnormal ɑ-angle was associated with mortality (OR, 1.59, 95% CI, 1.09-2.32, P = .015). The unequal weighting of TIC score components and adjustments to normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds were maintained but did not improve the model's predictive power.

Conclusion: A viscoelastic hemostatic assay-based TIC score is independently associated with mortality and pRBC transfusion volumes. This association persists with unequal weighting and adjustment of normal/abnormal cutoff thresholds of TEG components.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信